- Dec 5, 2010
- 100,144
- 36,185
- 2,290
Ropey (sorry, I'm not sure how to quote more than one person in the same post, is that sarcasm about having such a better statistical chance to be right? I'd be pretty interested in hearing whatever quantum theory you're referring to.
No, I am not a sarcastic sort as I find it deters from understanding one another. I don't go there, or if I do, very seldom.
That's why I said on a lighter note. Your chances of being right statistically are far better than our chances. Your is exist or not.
Ours is who exists and there are many more choices.
But, with regards to quantum theory, then all are possible and all are simply either or choices.
So, then, it comes back full circle. Quantum theory opens up a quantum probability where all possibilities are possible and singular so as to support all arguable, but with little (seemingly) mechanical evidence it doesn't matter because we don't seem to fully exist in that quantum universe.
But it is arguable, and as such can defeat the purity of elegant non quantitative (qualitative) mechanics.