Why did Bush ignore 9/11 warnings?

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
159,861
76,469
2,330
Native America
world-trade-center-9-11.jpg


Reporter: Bush ‘negligence’ ignored pre-9/11 warnings | The Raw Story

Bush Administration Ignored 9/11 Warnings -- Daily Intel

The Bush Administration Know-It-Alls Who Failed to Heed Warnings Before 9/11 - The Daily Beast

Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider

NYT: Bush administration ignored more terror warnings before 9/11 than previously thought - Lean Forward

The Bush White House Was Deaf to 9/11 Warnings - The New York Times

Bush ignored 6 specific warnings of an impending terrorist attack, new evidence
 
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_tFKa2_YBQ"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_tFKa2_YBQ[/ame]
 
ForGget BUSH II. We all know why he was out of the loop. He was a bloody moron and everthing he touched turned to shit salad..

WHY DID OUR ENTIRE INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL DEFENCE COMMUNITY FAIL?

That's the real fucking question, don't you think?

And while I'm about the business of bitching about REALITY instead of partisan fucking policidiots, what makes any of us think those good ol' boys are any more prepared now than they were on 911?


I will remind you all that the same bloody incompetents who FAILED to protect the PENTAGON AND NEW YORK CITY ARE STILL IN CHARGE.
 

Why did Clinton ignore those warnings?? He had those warnings far longer than Bush did. In fact He passed those warnings on to Bush.

He also could have taken out that dirtbag UBL several times and didn't.

Clinton didn't shut the country down on those vague warnings and neither did Bush. Guess they should both be hung from the nearest tree.

You can bet your ass Clinton thanks God every night on his knees that AQ held off that attack until he was out of office for 8 months. I know I sure would.


Your an idiot Shitting bull without an ounce of common sense.
 
Last edited:
Poor Lakhota, people are Criticizing his Dear leader..so what does he come up with to counter that?

Obamabots and the trolls on this board are some of the most PATHETIC
 
Last edited:
Poor Lakhota, people are Criticizing his Dear leader..so what does he come up with to counter that?

Obamabots and the trolls on this board are some of the most PATHETIC

Because you're making a bigger deal over 4 than you did over 3,000. Bush was a hero despite having much more time to get things right. That's HYPOCRISY.
 
Poor Lakhota, people are Criticizing his Dear leader..so what does he come up with to counter that?

Obamabots and the trolls on this board are some of the most PATHETIC

Because you're making a bigger deal over 4 than you did over 3,000. Bush was a hero despite having much more time to get things right. That's HYPOCRISY.


Obama could lie to you people day in and day out and you would still be on your knees

He knows his followers well
 
Bush should have done an FDR and thrown every Muslim male and Progressive in a FEMA camp
 
Poor Lakhota, people are Criticizing his Dear leader..so what does he come up with to counter that?

Obamabots and the trolls on this board are some of the most PATHETIC

You know how these religious fanatics get when you criticize their Lord and Savior
 
So, what, exactly, should President Bush have done to prevent 9/11?

Please be specific.

One of the terrorists trained to do the attacks had a change of conscience and turned himself into the FBI and told them what was going to happen. They did not believe him. When the FBI started to investigate, they were told to stand down. This was an article on the front page on the London Times, a Murdoch paper, but somehow did not make it into the American media. They could have listened to this guy b
 
Poor Lakhota, people are Criticizing his Dear leader..so what does he come up with to counter that?

Obamabots and the trolls on this board are some of the most PATHETIC

Because you're making a bigger deal over 4 than you did over 3,000. Bush was a hero despite having much more time to get things right. That's HYPOCRISY.

Bush was warned about an attack that could happen any where, anytime. When 911 did happen, bush acted like a leader and took over and handled the situation. Obama on the other hand was warned several times, it was a specific place, specific time, he watched it happen in real time, he did nothing to help. Then after knowing 4 americans got killed he went to bed, then got up and went to vegas. Then lied about what happened to try to hide his negligence. We knew who and everything about 911 within 2 weeks, it's been almost 3 months and obama still doesn't know anything.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
So, what, exactly, should President Bush have done to prevent 9/11?

Please be specific.

One of the terrorists trained to do the attacks had a change of conscience and turned himself into the FBI and told them what was going to happen. They did not believe him. When the FBI started to investigate, they were told to stand down. This was an article on the front page on the London Times, a Murdoch paper, but somehow did not make it into the American media. They could have listened to this guy b

You do have a link to prove that don't you?
 
So, what, exactly, should President Bush have done to prevent 9/11?

Please be specific.

One of the terrorists trained to do the attacks had a change of conscience and turned himself into the FBI and told them what was going to happen. They did not believe him. When the FBI started to investigate, they were told to stand down. This was an article on the front page on the London Times, a Murdoch paper, but somehow did not make it into the American media. They could have listened to this guy b

Looks like your post got cut off. Do you have a link to the article?
 
So, what, exactly, should President Bush have done to prevent 9/11?

Please be specific.

One of the terrorists trained to do the attacks had a change of conscience and turned himself into the FBI and told them what was going to happen. They did not believe him. When the FBI started to investigate, they were told to stand down. This was an article on the front page on the London Times, a Murdoch paper, but somehow did not make it into the American media. They could have listened to this guy b

Looks like your post got cut off. Do you have a link to the article?

It was actually a couple of articles. The second article was asking the FBI why they did not investigate it. The FBI turned the guy over to MI6, and they did not believe him either. So much for 'intelligence' agencies. I am sure the articles are in the London Times archives. I remember that the original article was in a Saturday edition. Since then, I have been told that the information is in the report from the investigation of 9/11, buried in there somewhere.
 

None of your links show that George Bush was warned that terrorists were going to slam aircraft into buildings. All they say was that Bin Laden was "determined to strike" and that the attacks were "imminent" or "soon". So what was he supposed to do with these vague warnings? Confine everyone of Arab descent until the threat was no longer "imminent"? Declare martial law over the entire country?

Tell us what you would have done if you had received the same vague warnings.
 

Forum List

Back
Top