Why are democrats labeled violent when we decide to fight back?

I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485
images
images
images
images
View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????
images
images
images
View attachment 145490View attachment 145489
images


thanks for demonstrating once again just how big of an idiot you are
Before I'm sent to the rubber room, why is it wrong to express concern over the labels liberals are getting from you nit wit nuts?


go ahead start some shit

lets let the shit hit the fan ass wipe
Where you monkeys at? Its more of you than us. What you waiting for?

Apparently Asslips does not realize that blacks do not comprise more than 14% of the population.

I do, and the ratio is much higher where I am, but we're not all racist-ish, imagine that! :eek:
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
Outstanding. They killed off an entire culture in Tasmania.
You don't seem to mind the culture too much. If you did, you'd be barefoot back in the motherland twigging grubs out of a rotten stump. The only thing you hate about white culture is that your kind are far too primitive to come up with anything even remotely close. In a word... Envy.
My kind taught your kind to bathe. We built the worlds first civilizations before your kind stopped eating each other and were even sentient. Gimme a break cave monkey. If not for Black people you would have regressed all the way back to neanderthal status if we had not saved you during the dark ages.
 
I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485
images
images
images
images
View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????
images
images
images
View attachment 145490View attachment 145489
images


thanks for demonstrating once again just how big of an idiot you are
Before I'm sent to the rubber room, why is it wrong to express concern over the labels liberals are getting from you nit wit nuts?


go ahead start some shit

lets let the shit hit the fan ass wipe
Where you monkeys at? Its more of you than us. What you waiting for?

Apparently Asslips does not realize that blacks do not comprise more than 14% of the population.

I do, and the ratio is much higher where I am, but we're not all racist-ish, imagine that! :eek:
I am aware of the ratio. I just know one Black guy is worth about 100 or more whites.

Not all of you are racist but you all have the gene.
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
Keep doing what you do. The laughs are priceless.
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centuries before the European slave trade.
 
I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485
images
images
images
images
View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????
images
images
images
View attachment 145490View attachment 145489
images



The Barrypuppet was a marxist, he belonged to an offshoot party of the demcrat party called the "N.E.W Party" which was blatantly socialist. His mentor was Frank Marshall Davis, an avowed communist. He even stated that while he was on college campus that he was drawn to the socialist and marxist crowd. His policies and wants mirrored that of communist style globalism. People would be against that regardless of the tint of one's skin.

It's not the tint of Barrypuppet's skin that mattered, it was the thin skin of his fellow marxist supporters that whined that any criticism of him was "racist" which was total bullshit. You voted for him based on his marxist ideas or the tint of his skin.....either way, it doesn't say much for you and your intelligence.
Which Marxist ideas was those again?
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centutharies before the European slave trade.
Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.
Whos writing? Why did Egyptians specifically call the interior of Africa "the land of gods" and say they came from there? Why did they orient Africa as the top of the world which is exactly the opposite of europe?
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
Keep doing what you do. The laughs are priceless.
Dont worry i will. I make it my mission to educate morons such as yourself that still believe that white washed version of history.
 
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.
Whos writing? Why did Egyptians specifically call the interior of Africa "the land of gods" and say they came from there? Why did they orient Africa as the top of the world which is exactly the opposite of europe?

Why is Asclepias such a derp faggot? :dunno:

It's like the lollipop question, baby.
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centutharies before the European slave trade.
Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?
And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.
 
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Mediterranean/North Africans do not = Subsaharan Africans/Negros. No matter how badly you wish they did. Hell! They discovered how readily slavable your kind are centuries before Europeans did. Lol. I love your self deprecating history revisionism... I really do.
Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?
By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.
Whos writing? Why did Egyptians specifically call the interior of Africa "the land of gods" and say they came from there? Why did they orient Africa as the top of the world which is exactly the opposite of europe?
The romans, greeks, hittites amongst others speak of the egyptians as being a distinctly different people from the nubian kingdoms.

OK, I give up why did the egyptians call it the land of the gods? Why do the native peoples of australia consider Ayers Rock sacred? Why do the Hopi of the US talk about the ant people that came from the sky? As far orienting maps, how do you think the ancient chinese oriented their maps? With China at the center?
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
i think everyone fucked the jews over.....
 
It is a known fact that throughout the history of mankind, it has been the white race that has caused more carnage, more deaths, more destruction and mayhem than of any race known to mankind.
Share-of-Deaths_Archaeological-Evidence-on-Violence.png


You killed off jews, indians, blacks and bunnies...the only thing you nuts can't kill off are roaches!!
What a load of crap. The history of Europe is that of being invaded by non white peoples. Try educating yourself.

Look into Islam's march across N Africa or Asia. Read up a little on the Mongols, who by some estimates may have at times slaughtered as much as a tenth of the human population on the planet.

As far as the Americas' most historians note that the vast majority of of native peoples deaths were from disease not violence. Most estimates are in the 90% range. Sad to say the native peoples of the Americas were doomed, sooner or later someone was going to cross an ocean and bring diseases that they had no resistance to. Whether they came from Europe, Africa or Asia is irrelevant.
If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.
Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centutharies before the European slave trade.
Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?
And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.
That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.
 
I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485
images
images
images
images
View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????
images
images
images
View attachment 145490View attachment 145489
images


Because you aren't fighting back, you are attacking peaceful rally attendees and people going to conserative speeches.......you can lie about this, but the truth is obvious....antifa and black lives matter are violent, racist groups....
 

Forum List

Back
Top