Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism...

No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.
I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.
Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.
Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.
Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.
Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern
Government is socialism. We have a democratic, representative republic.
Socialism is only one form of government which always fails we have no socialist government
Simply using other People's tax monies is socialism.
Socialism is a form of government which always fails it is not all government nor is it merely stealing and using the loot
Lousy management does that not socialism.
Capitalism is all about meritocracy.

Socialism is all about theft and slavery which is why we have no socialist government
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.
I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.
Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.
Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.
Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.
Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern
Government is socialism. We have a democratic, representative republic.
Socialism is only one form of government which never works and which we do not have
You are special pleading and appealing to ignorance. Our form of Government is merely one implementation of socialism.
I am stating facts and pleading to nothing.

You are proving you are ignorant.

Our form of government is not socialist. Government is not socialism.
You only appeal to ignorance of economics and facts.
Where as you only appeal to yourself and your fantasyland.
And valid arguments with the fewest fallacies.
Yours is an invalid argument based exclusively on fallacies
Government is socialism because it derives its authority from the People.
 
I have presented valid arguments proving you wrong and you are a right winger far more to the right than I am

You are wrong and every one on the left and right knows this.
You have nothing but fallacy not any valid arguments.
You are projecting.

I have facts and valid arguments I have proven it is you spouting fallacies and contradictory, illogical and therefore invalid arguments.

You know this is true
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
Social-ism. Nothing more.
 
I have presented valid arguments proving you wrong and you are a right winger far more to the right than I am

You are wrong and every one on the left and right knows this.
You have nothing but fallacy not any valid arguments.
You are projecting.

I have facts and valid arguments I have proven it is you spouting fallacies and contradictory, illogical and therefore invalid arguments.

You know this is true
All I know is you only have Hoax not valid arguments.
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.
I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.
Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.
Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.
Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.
Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern
Government is socialism. We have a democratic, representative republic.
Socialism is only one form of government which never works and which we do not have
You are special pleading and appealing to ignorance. Our form of Government is merely one implementation of socialism.
I am stating facts and pleading to nothing.

You are proving you are ignorant.

Our form of government is not socialist. Government is not socialism.
You only appeal to ignorance of economics and facts.
Where as you only appeal to yourself and your fantasyland.
And valid arguments with the fewest fallacies.
Yours is an invalid argument based exclusively on fallacies
Government is socialism because it derives its authority from the People.
Socialism is only one form of government and derives its power from elitists.
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
Social-ism. Nothing more.
Social-ism is only one form of government which always fails.

Claiming it is government is an ignorant claim which appeals to ignorance and is a fallacy
 
I have presented valid arguments proving you wrong and you are a right winger far more to the right than I am

You are wrong and every one on the left and right knows this.
You have nothing but fallacy not any valid arguments.
You are projecting.

I have facts and valid arguments I have proven it is you spouting fallacies and contradictory, illogical and therefore invalid arguments.

You know this is true
All I know is you only have Hoax not valid arguments.
You know I am correct and have proven you wrong.

Yoou know I am your intellectual superior and I have owned you
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.
I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.
Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.
Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.
Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.
Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern
Government is socialism. We have a democratic, representative republic.
Socialism is only one form of government which never works and which we do not have
You are special pleading and appealing to ignorance. Our form of Government is merely one implementation of socialism.
I am stating facts and pleading to nothing.

You are proving you are ignorant.

Our form of government is not socialist. Government is not socialism.
You only appeal to ignorance of economics and facts.
Where as you only appeal to yourself and your fantasyland.
And valid arguments with the fewest fallacies.
Yours is an invalid argument based exclusively on fallacies
Government is socialism because it derives its authority from the People.
Socialism is only one form of government and derives its power from elitists.
The franchise is socialism not capitalism.
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.
I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.
Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.
Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.
Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.
Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern
Government is socialism. We have a democratic, representative republic.
Socialism is only one form of government which never works and which we do not have
You are special pleading and appealing to ignorance. Our form of Government is merely one implementation of socialism.
I am stating facts and pleading to nothing.

You are proving you are ignorant.

Our form of government is not socialist. Government is not socialism.
You only appeal to ignorance of economics and facts.
Where as you only appeal to yourself and your fantasyland.
And valid arguments with the fewest fallacies.
Yours is an invalid argument based exclusively on fallacies
Government is socialism because it derives its authority from the People.
Socialism is only one form of government and derives its power from elitists.
The franchise is socialism not capitalism.

Wrong
The franchise is collaboration not socialism. Collabortions thrive in capitalism but fail in socialism
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
Social-ism. Nothing more.
Social-ism is only one form of government which always fails.

Claiming it is government is an ignorant claim which appeals to ignorance and is a fallacy
social: relating to society or its organization.

social-ism directly explains my usage of the term for social purposes not one sided political purposes.
 
I have presented valid arguments proving you wrong and you are a right winger far more to the right than I am

You are wrong and every one on the left and right knows this.
You have nothing but fallacy not any valid arguments.
You are projecting.

I have facts and valid arguments I have proven it is you spouting fallacies and contradictory, illogical and therefore invalid arguments.

You know this is true
All I know is you only have Hoax not valid arguments.
You know I am correct and have proven you wrong.

Yoou know I am your intellectual superior and I have owned you
Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful.
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
Social-ism. Nothing more.
Social-ism is only one form of government which always fails.

Claiming it is government is an ignorant claim which appeals to ignorance and is a fallacy
social: relating to society or its organization.

social-ism directly explains my usage of the term for social purposes not one sided political purposes.
Social-ism: One form of government which owns the means of production.

Society has no political purposes. Society is nothing more than a vague concept

Your use of the term socialidsm is illogical contradictory and strictly used by you for one sided political purposes
 
I have presented valid arguments proving you wrong and you are a right winger far more to the right than I am

You are wrong and every one on the left and right knows this.
You have nothing but fallacy not any valid arguments.
You are projecting.

I have facts and valid arguments I have proven it is you spouting fallacies and contradictory, illogical and therefore invalid arguments.

You know this is true
All I know is you only have Hoax not valid arguments.
You know I am correct and have proven you wrong.

Yoou know I am your intellectual superior and I have owned you
Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful.
I wouldn't know

Your fantasy is retarded
 
No it is not government is not socialism
Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?
Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.
I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.
In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.
Could you provide me with your definition of socialism and capitalism? It seems your definition may not be the same as the dictionary.
Mine is better. I have more than just political jargon from the Cold War which only confuses instead of explains.

Social-ism is about ensuring social Order through Government. Capitalism is merely that, chaotic markets engaged in Commerce.
Yours is garbage and innacurate.

No one is using political jargon from the cold war.

Others are accurate and correct your definition is idiotic

Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Society can ensure nothing as it does not exist except as a vague concept
I don't get my understanding only from dictionary definitions (invented for the Cold War).


You said earlier you subscribe to your own definition of socialism. Why can you not be honest with yourself or anyone else?
Social-ism. Nothing more.
Social-ism is only one form of government which always fails.

Claiming it is government is an ignorant claim which appeals to ignorance and is a fallacy
social: relating to society or its organization.

social-ism directly explains my usage of the term for social purposes not one sided political purposes.
Social-ism: One form of government which owns the means of production.

Society has no political purposes. Society is nothing more than a vague concept

Your use of the term socialidsm is illogical contradictory and strictly used by you for one sided political purposes
Not based on the word social. Social is about society and its organization; Government.
 
Wrong
The franchise is collaboration not socialism. Clloboragtions thrive in capitalism but fail in socialism
The franchise is based on our social contract not our capital contract.
There is no such thing as a social contract.

Franchises are based on voluntary contracts between two or more individual persons
Our Constitutions are social contracts not capital contracts. See how easy it is for comparison and contrast purposes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top