I mean, really.....any who would claim that they would is simply refusing to admit that they were a fool to start with.
I challenge anyone to read this thread and claim that they would vote for Obama again.
Let's examine some of the 'benefits' that an Obama-vote has accumulated.
1. Obama has essentially flushed taxpayer money down the toilet of the welfare system...with results that are the exact opposite of what was desired.
a. "... since President Obama took office, federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year. Despite this government largess, more than 46 million Americans continue to live in poverty. Despite nearly $15 trillion in total welfare spending since Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1964, the
poverty rate is perilously close to where we began more than 40 years ago.Throwing money at the problem has neither reduced poverty nor made the poor self-sufficient." Scribd
b. "….the dramatically larger increase also suggests that part of the program’s growth is due to conscious policy choices by this administration to ease eligibility rules and expand caseloads….income limits for eligibility have risen twice as fast as inflation since 2007 and are now roughly 10 percent higher than they were when Obama took office. Casey Mulligan, “The Sharp Increase in the Food Stamps Program,” Economix,
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/the-sharp-increase-in-the-food-stamps-program/
Study More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected CNS News
There is no way to explain the facts other than attributing a design by Obama to make more and more folks dependant on the federal government.
Had the mantra been 'The federal government will support you' rather than the vacuous 'Hope and Change,'....would you have voted for him?
2. The poor have suffered under Obama.
a. "Baltimore's people of the woods: Inside the hidden homeless camps made of milk crates, wooden doors and tarps on the outskirts of town" Baltimore s people of the woods Inside the hidden homeless camps made of milk crates wooden doors and tarps on the outskirts of town Daily Mail Online
The article is comprised of a dozen or so pics as described. It is Obama's 'Hooverville.'
This, and other such Obamavilles are the result of his inept economic leadership.
3. Rather than making it easier to start or run a business, this inexperience boy wonder has made it almost impossible.
a. "Government report finds regulations have spiked under Obama: The number of regulations from Washington has spiked since President Obama took office, according to a new government report.
The Obama administration published more “major” final rules in its first term than the George W. Bush administration did in its second, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS).... The Obama administration has come under fire for its aggressive regulatory policies, with congressional Republicans complaining that the wave of new rules is costing businesses and amounts to executive overreach.
A report issued last week by the conservative Heritage Foundation placed the price tag of Obama’s first-term regulations at $70 billion."
Government report finds regulations have spiked under Obama TheHill
Americans worse off after six years of Obama incompetence.
Knowing what you know know.....
...who would have voted for this in the first place????
I challenge anyone to read this thread and claim that they would vote for Obama again.
Let's examine some of the 'benefits' that an Obama-vote has accumulated.
1. Obama has essentially flushed taxpayer money down the toilet of the welfare system...with results that are the exact opposite of what was desired.
a. "... since President Obama took office, federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year. Despite this government largess, more than 46 million Americans continue to live in poverty. Despite nearly $15 trillion in total welfare spending since Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1964, the
poverty rate is perilously close to where we began more than 40 years ago.Throwing money at the problem has neither reduced poverty nor made the poor self-sufficient." Scribd
b. "….the dramatically larger increase also suggests that part of the program’s growth is due to conscious policy choices by this administration to ease eligibility rules and expand caseloads….income limits for eligibility have risen twice as fast as inflation since 2007 and are now roughly 10 percent higher than they were when Obama took office. Casey Mulligan, “The Sharp Increase in the Food Stamps Program,” Economix,
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/the-sharp-increase-in-the-food-stamps-program/
Study More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected CNS News
There is no way to explain the facts other than attributing a design by Obama to make more and more folks dependant on the federal government.
Had the mantra been 'The federal government will support you' rather than the vacuous 'Hope and Change,'....would you have voted for him?
2. The poor have suffered under Obama.
a. "Baltimore's people of the woods: Inside the hidden homeless camps made of milk crates, wooden doors and tarps on the outskirts of town" Baltimore s people of the woods Inside the hidden homeless camps made of milk crates wooden doors and tarps on the outskirts of town Daily Mail Online
The article is comprised of a dozen or so pics as described. It is Obama's 'Hooverville.'
This, and other such Obamavilles are the result of his inept economic leadership.
3. Rather than making it easier to start or run a business, this inexperience boy wonder has made it almost impossible.
a. "Government report finds regulations have spiked under Obama: The number of regulations from Washington has spiked since President Obama took office, according to a new government report.
The Obama administration published more “major” final rules in its first term than the George W. Bush administration did in its second, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS).... The Obama administration has come under fire for its aggressive regulatory policies, with congressional Republicans complaining that the wave of new rules is costing businesses and amounts to executive overreach.
A report issued last week by the conservative Heritage Foundation placed the price tag of Obama’s first-term regulations at $70 billion."
Government report finds regulations have spiked under Obama TheHill
Americans worse off after six years of Obama incompetence.
Knowing what you know know.....
...who would have voted for this in the first place????
