Who Supports The Official 9/11 Gov’t Cover Stories

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Terral, Apr 11, 2009.

?

Do you support The Official 9/11 Gov't Cover Stories?

  1. Yes. I believe the Gov't explanations for the 9/11 attacks.

    56.3%
  2. No. The evidence does not match the Gov't explanations.

    43.8%
  1. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +91
    Greetings to All:

    This thread is dedicated to answering the question about how many of you support the Official Government Cover Stories for these related 9/11 attacks.

    Case #1: Flight 93/Shanksville

    The Gov’t says Flight 93 crashed into this empty Shanksville field (my thread):

    [​IMG]

    The evidence indicates that the little empty hole has grass growing on all the slopes/inclines . . .

    [​IMG]

    . . . and cannot be more than just a few feet deep. The evidence also says this hole (pic) was created ‘before’ this US Geological Survey picture was taken on April 20, 1994.

    Case #2: Flight 77/The Pentagon

    The Gov’t says AA77 crashed into this standing E-ring wall (my thread) . . .

    [​IMG]

    . . . going 530 miles per hour, when the evidence clearly says that no 100-ton Jetliner ever crashed here.

    [​IMG]

    The rear C-ring wall is only 220 feet (diagram) from the standing E-ring Wall, but the only evidence we have is a little 8 to 10-feet hole . . .

    [​IMG]

    . . . again saying that no 100-ton Jetliner crashed here; just like these military/aviation experts:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKhBzAh_eeA"]These Experts Say AA77 DID NOT Crash Here[/ame]

    Case #3: WTC-7 Controlled Demolition


    The Gov’t says WTC-7 Collapsed from building fires/debris, when the evidence shows the 47-story overbuilt skyscraper imploding into its own footprint in 6.6 seconds (my thread):

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A"]Typical CD Implosion[/ame]

    [​IMG]

    The evidence shows a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper . . .

    [​IMG]

    . . . collapsing CD-style into a neat little pile, while the buildings on the perimeter remain perfectly intact. Typical building fires burn at around 800-degrees (link), while red-iron structural steel melts at near 2800 degrees (link).

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uNbKJofv3c"]YouTube - 9/11 Coincidences (Part Eight)[/ame]

    The reasons that WTC-7 could not possibly burn down from building fires is explained very well in this short video. A steel-framed skyscraper has never burned down in the history of this planet, but the Gov’t says that happened three times on 9/11; IF you believe the Official Cover Stories.

    Those among you voting “Yes” with Senor Bushie, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their inside-job cohorts should be prepared to provide evidence for “WHY” you hold to the Official Cover Stories having ‘nothing’ whatsoever to do with the ‘evidence.’ A “No” vote means that you realize the ‘evidence’ simply does not even begin to match the Official Cover Stories.

    GL,

    Terral
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  2. LA RAM FAN
    Online

    LA RAM FAN Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,732
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,736
    uh terral why create a duplicate thread of the 9/11 coverup commission fairy tale report??
     
  3. Big_D
    Offline

    Big_D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    377
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ratings:
    +34
    Your poll question makes it seems that we either agree with the govt 100% or believe it was an inside job. Couldn't someone disagree with the govt reports on a number of aspects and still not be convinced it was inside job?
     
  4. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +91
    Hi Inside Job and Big_D:

    There is nothing in the OP about the 911Commission Report. You either agree (Yes) with the Gov't Cover Stories, OR the evidence simply does 'not' (No) add up. Period.

    Big_D either agrees with the Official Gov't Cover Stories for 'his' good reasons (Yes), OR the evidence simply does not add up to what the Gov't is selling as 'their' conspiracy theory:

    [​IMG]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ"]You Believe This Guy OR You Do Not[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G1N7WCZ9c8"]Bush Is Lying, OR Telling The 911Truth[/ame]

    You either believe the Gov't explanations for the 9/11 attacks (Yes), OR the evidence does NOT add up (No). There is no room on the fence for your Big_D backside. :0)

    GL,

    Terral
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  5. Big_D
    Offline

    Big_D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    377
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ratings:
    +34
    Thanks for the kind words but I do not think I really can answer the poll question since I only read small parts of the 9/11 commission and NIST report.
     
  6. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    no.....the cover-up alone ....is treason..prior knowleadge is treason...an inside job...
     
  7. LA RAM FAN
    Online

    LA RAM FAN Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,732
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,736
    exactly.well said.so terral is THAT why you made this thread was cause there is nothing in that other thread about the 9/11 commission?
     
  8. Kalam
    Offline

    Kalam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,866
    Thanks Received:
    773
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +773
    ZOG supporting mind-slave reporting in.
     
  9. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    ZOG ? WTF ?...more media programed responses..and straw men
     
  10. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054

Share This Page