Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is despicable that some people only care about this because of misplaced ideological reasons. Four people gave their lives representing what is best about America and people like you are showing off what is worse in American politicsAdminstrations also have an obligation to protect American working for them.
Terrorists did kill those four very good men and the administration did nothing to assist those four very good men. Terrorist might not have been able to kill them if security had been beefed up. Hell other embassies and the Red Cross pulled out because of threats. We should have done the same. Failing that we should have beefed up security big time.
That wasn't done and four very good men are dead.
It is the security professionals within the State Dept who are charged with the safety of our people overseas. In Libya we had a consulate, not an embassy and the Ambassador didn't want to pull out. He wasn't a chickenshit like most who now shield their partisan ideological attacks behind his and the pothers sacrifice.
Why can't all you people be as honest as some of the most shrill and partisan types here who speak from their blackened hearts, and admit they see things the way you do because they are filled with hate and loathing for the President and Secretary Clinton?
How do you know that Stevens didn't want out? Do tell where you've gotten this information. While you're at it, why don't you tell us why, knowing that the host government wasn't capable of protecting our consulate staff, did we leave American personnel unprotected in a country where we had already sustained multiple attacks. You claim to be in the know. Fill the rest of us in on the details.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.Neocons, teabaggers, birthers, oathers.....the same collection of parrots and clowns that bought into McConnell's declaration are now lemmings to the cliff in the latest GOP diatribe to discredit Obama.
Thing is, the little dopes are just too stubborn to realize that there is no "smoking gun" here other than the distortions and lies fed to them by the likes of Hannity, Crowley, Levin, Drudge, Klein and Limbaugh.
More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
No one is buying their BS anymore, as the election proved...and 2014 has them sweating bullets.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.Neocons, teabaggers, birthers, oathers.....the same collection of parrots and clowns that bought into McConnell's declaration are now lemmings to the cliff in the latest GOP diatribe to discredit Obama.
Thing is, the little dopes are just too stubborn to realize that there is no "smoking gun" here other than the distortions and lies fed to them by the likes of Hannity, Crowley, Levin, Drudge, Klein and Limbaugh.
More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
No one is buying their BS anymore, as the election proved...and 2014 has them sweating bullets.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
Imbecile.
If I am the CIC the Military will do what I direct them to do.
Again, the concrete proof of your accusation does not exists, as many on this thread have documented. So your lame generalized insinuation fails.
If our half white President had given the order to in and save them they would have been alive today.
Pure supposition and conjecture from a bigoted fool who has NO concept as to how things work in the State Dept. with regards to what gets to the President's desk and when.
One squad of Marines would have ended that shit...but you wouldn't know that because are a silly little pussy without any real experience.
More babbling from this bigoted fool, who desperately IGNORES THE FACT that his tin gods in the GOP Congress & Senate CONSISTENTLY REFUSED TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR EMBASSY/CONSULATE SECURITY.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.Neocons, teabaggers, birthers, oathers.....the same collection of parrots and clowns that bought into McConnell's declaration are now lemmings to the cliff in the latest GOP diatribe to discredit Obama.
Thing is, the little dopes are just too stubborn to realize that there is no "smoking gun" here other than the distortions and lies fed to them by the likes of Hannity, Crowley, Levin, Drudge, Klein and Limbaugh.
More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
No one is buying their BS anymore, as the election proved...and 2014 has them sweating bullets.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
Imbecile.
If I am the CIC the Military will do what I direct them to do.
If our half white President had given the order to in and save them they would have been alive today.
One squad of Marines would have ended that shit...but you wouldn't know that because are a silly little pussy without any real experience.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
You have no idea what/who our sources are you dope.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
The lie of what you say, and yes you are lying, is that funding had one damn thing to do with what happened in Benghazi. If you were not a low information voter you would have viewed the video provided early and read where Lamb said she upgraded security at Benghazi. The funding BS is just another liberal BS story line invented to try and cover for the manslaughter of our men.
BTW I don't believe you are intentionally lying you are just repeating lies invented by someone else, I assume you believe this line of BS to be true, but it ain't.
Imbecile.
If I am the CIC the Military will do what I direct them to do.
If our half white President had given the order to in and save them they would have been alive today.
One squad of Marines would have ended that shit...but you wouldn't know that because are a silly little pussy without any real experience.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
See there in lies the difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives just don't get it. It was totally a lack of funding. Obviously if Obama had a quarter he would have dropped it into a pay phone and called in the calvery. But alas we are so broke we have to send our men into countries we just bombed the crap out of and after we just killed OBL. No problem doing so, nothing bad happened. Benghazi, Conservatives = WTF??? Liberals = WGAF????
Video From Benghazi Consulate Shows Organized Attack - The
www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/12/video-from-benghazi...
Video From Benghazi ... the U.S. government is also poring over video taken from an overhead U.S. surveillance drone that arrived for ... At the same time, ...
Lawmakers shown video of Benghazi attack | San Diego 6 |
Lawmakers shown video of Benghazi attack | San Diego 6 | National / World News
WASHINGTON (AP) Lawmakers have seen a video made drone surveillance and security camera video that showed them in real time the attack in Libya that killed
Bing Video - Bing Videosq=Drones+tppl+real+time+video+of+Benghazi+attack%3f&mid=862DDB025E94D9FD9C95862DDB025E94D9FD9C95&view=detail&FORM=VIRE6
Benghazi: Obama watched as they died - YouTube
Oh, where oh, where have those videos gone?
Oh, where oh, where have the videos been stashed?
Imbecile.
If I am the CIC the Military will do what I direct them to do.
If our half white President had given the order to in and save them they would have been alive today.
One squad of Marines would have ended that shit...but you wouldn't know that because are a silly little pussy without any real experience.
See there in lies the difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives just don't get it. It was totally a lack of funding. Obviously if Obama had a quarter he would have dropped it into a pay phone and called in the calvery. But alas we are so broke we have to send our men into countries we just bombed the crap out of and after we just killed OBL. No problem doing so, nothing bad happened. Benghazi, Conservatives = WTF??? Liberals = WGAF????
ONce again, a willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger parrot creates his own scenario in lieu of FACTS.
The GOP fought against requested increase in funding for security. Period. That security would have made it NOT necessary to immediately call the President for a bug out of personnel.
As for the lie of "real time and such"....you dopes will hang onto that just like you do every other lie Drudge & company have fed you since 2008.
Then please enlighten us all, my willfully ignorant friend.....because if you can't, then you're just blowing smoke. More to the point, I DARE you to try and logically/factually disprove my statement More to the point, they ignore the FACT that it was the BUSH administration and the GOP in Congress that CONSISTENTLY denied the State Dept. increased funding for security in the last decade.
I'll wait.
The lie of what you say, and yes you are lying, is that funding had one damn thing to do with what happened in Benghazi. If you were not a low information voter you would have viewed the video provided early and read where Lamb said she upgraded security at Benghazi. The funding BS is just another liberal BS story line invented to try and cover for the manslaughter of our men.
BTW I don't believe you are intentionally lying you are just repeating lies invented by someone else, I assume you believe this line of BS to be true, but it ain't.
Stop and think, genius.....better yet stop listening/watching Drudge, Fox News and the WND. Funding means that when security upgrade is asked for, then it's gotten in full instead of doled out or not gotten at all. The REINFORCEMENTS that the consulated asked for would not have been necessary if full funding were provided.
Got that bunky? Or do I have to do your homework and provide you with facts that will back up what I say?
See there in lies the difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives just don't get it. It was totally a lack of funding. Obviously if Obama had a quarter he would have dropped it into a pay phone and called in the calvery. But alas we are so broke we have to send our men into countries we just bombed the crap out of and after we just killed OBL. No problem doing so, nothing bad happened. Benghazi, Conservatives = WTF??? Liberals = WGAF????
ONce again, a willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger parrot creates his own scenario in lieu of FACTS.
The GOP fought against requested increase in funding for security. Period. That security would have made it NOT necessary to immediately call the President for a bug out of personnel.
As for the lie of "real time and such"....you dopes will hang onto that just like you do every other lie Drudge & company have fed you since 2008.
So you double down on dishonesty. Who is saying it was a lack of funding that allowed mortars to be used against the embassy? Who is saying that a lack of funding was the reason an organized attack on the embassy was successful? IF you would have viewed the video of Lamb's testimony to congress you would know she said no such thing. She said they had just increased the security. But I doubt you viewed the video or read the transcript provided where she says she was watching in almost real time. Too bad she didn't have a phone to call the WH. The liberal left has become so dishonest I seriously doubt you know the truth. My suggestion, don't view the video and don't read the transcript provided, stay ignorant that way you can always have the out that you were not lying you are just a low information voter or just say you are an Obama liberal, everyone will know.
The lie of what you say, and yes you are lying, is that funding had one damn thing to do with what happened in Benghazi. If you were not a low information voter you would have viewed the video provided early and read where Lamb said she upgraded security at Benghazi. The funding BS is just another liberal BS story line invented to try and cover for the manslaughter of our men.
BTW I don't believe you are intentionally lying you are just repeating lies invented by someone else, I assume you believe this line of BS to be true, but it ain't.
Stop and think, genius.....better yet stop listening/watching Drudge, Fox News and the WND. Funding means that when security upgrade is asked for, then it's gotten in full instead of doled out or not gotten at all. The REINFORCEMENTS that the consulated asked for would not have been necessary if full funding were provided.
Got that bunky? Or do I have to do your homework and provide you with facts that will back up what I say?
Please read my reply to the other low information Obama liberal who parrots the same talking points. Lamb watched the whole thing "almost" real time. She made no mention of a lack of security. BTW how does security stop mortars?
EDIT: I see it is the same Obama liberal now tripling down on dishonesty. Do you think if you keep saying the same lie over and over it will become true????