Who Says Bi-partisanship Is Dead?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Zoom-boing, Feb 26, 2010.

  1. Zoom-boing
    Offline

    Zoom-boing Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    25,064
    Thanks Received:
    7,260
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    East Japip
    Ratings:
    +10,123
    washingtonpost.com
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,369
    Thanks Received:
    19,843
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,401
    In the grander scope of things, earmarks are a red herring. They account for a a tiny percentage of the total budget.
    Fighting earmarks accounts to spending dollars to chase dimes

    They are an ethical annoyance but are not worth stopping the entire process
     
  3. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,548
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,163
    As I've always said. Bipartisanship is politicians of both parties joining together to screw us over.
     
  4. Murf76
    Offline

    Murf76 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,464
    Thanks Received:
    593
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +594
    Great article. Tom Coburn is one of the few who really seem to get it.

    My favorite bit:
    Amen, Brother Tom. Amen. :clap2:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Murf76
    Offline

    Murf76 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,464
    Thanks Received:
    593
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +594
    While it's true that earmarking only accounts for a small amount of Congressional spending... they, along with campaign finance, are the Devil's Road to Political Corruption.

    Defending earmarking is defending corruption and vote-buying. :eek:
    It's a pander to a local special interest.

    It's WRONG to seize property (money) from all our citizens for the benefit of just a few. And it doesn't matter what the reason is. If a given community wants a new library, they need to get their hindparts engaged and have some bake sales and wash some cars. Because it's morally WRONG to rob other citizens who will enjoy no benefit in that library.

    Legitimate Congressional spending will stand on its own merits.
     

Share This Page