cnelsen
Gold Member
- Banned
- #1
I remember seeing some photos a while back by New York photographer, Jon Herskobinowitzsteinman. They were taken in the shack of some guy who, let's just say, wasn't the best representation of the white race. I think he actually fired a shotgun at a fly on the wall during the photo interview, no doubt thinking he was impressing his visitor who was, no doubt, gleefully egging him on. The photos appeared in some anti-white magazine like the Atlantic and there was much hootin' and hollerin' in the comments along the lines of "yeah, there's your master race, for you!"
What those bigots were unwittingly mocking was the characteristic of whites that made us the utterly dominant race for centuries up until we turned over the reins of power to the Jews: our wide variability. Across the multitude of human aspects--intelligence, athleticism, crime, exploration, inventiveness, aggressiveness, scholarliness, civic-mindedness, creativity--the bell curve is flattest for whites. That is to say, you will find a higher share of whites at the extremes--very intelligent or very stupid, very athletic or very non-athletic, etc. Other races may exceed us in one extreme or the other in this or that category, but none is as spread out as we are in all of them.
In the same way, males have more variability than females (as Darwin would have predicted; natural selection would have favored those populations whose females showed rootedness and whose males showed risk-taking). This is why almost all the Nobel prizes in science, for example, or Harvard physics faculty are men. Nobel prize winners and Harvard physics faculty come from the extreme right tail of the bell curve, and they will be nearly all males. It's also why the videos of those who try to jump a highway on a motorcycle or fire a bottle rocket out of their butts are all males--they are the extreme left tail of the bell curve.
What those bigots were unwittingly mocking was the characteristic of whites that made us the utterly dominant race for centuries up until we turned over the reins of power to the Jews: our wide variability. Across the multitude of human aspects--intelligence, athleticism, crime, exploration, inventiveness, aggressiveness, scholarliness, civic-mindedness, creativity--the bell curve is flattest for whites. That is to say, you will find a higher share of whites at the extremes--very intelligent or very stupid, very athletic or very non-athletic, etc. Other races may exceed us in one extreme or the other in this or that category, but none is as spread out as we are in all of them.
In the same way, males have more variability than females (as Darwin would have predicted; natural selection would have favored those populations whose females showed rootedness and whose males showed risk-taking). This is why almost all the Nobel prizes in science, for example, or Harvard physics faculty are men. Nobel prize winners and Harvard physics faculty come from the extreme right tail of the bell curve, and they will be nearly all males. It's also why the videos of those who try to jump a highway on a motorcycle or fire a bottle rocket out of their butts are all males--they are the extreme left tail of the bell curve.