- May 20, 2009
- 144,499
- 66,898
- 2,330
Not too long ago, 4 commercial airliners were used to kill 3,000 Americans. These were aircraft that hadn't been altered or modified or carrying cargo other than people and luggage, so it's safe to consider a rogue 777 as a potential danger. I'm a bit pessimistic today, so I'll say it: a plane carrying even low level radioactive material would have turned lower Manhattan into a total ghost town for years.
We spend an enormous amount of money monitoring the world for missile launches and nuclear tests, so we clearly have the capability to track a 777, something the size of an ICMB yet moving 20 times slower.
My question is: Who fucked up? Which US Spy Agency either dropped the ball or is just not telling what they know about Malaysia 370?
The NSA monitors Signals, Homeland Security is making sure the Mexican Reconquest is proceeding without any interference.
Whose job is it and why aren't they saying anything?
We spend an enormous amount of money monitoring the world for missile launches and nuclear tests, so we clearly have the capability to track a 777, something the size of an ICMB yet moving 20 times slower.
My question is: Who fucked up? Which US Spy Agency either dropped the ball or is just not telling what they know about Malaysia 370?
The NSA monitors Signals, Homeland Security is making sure the Mexican Reconquest is proceeding without any interference.
Whose job is it and why aren't they saying anything?