whats your opinion about gun law suites

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Johnney, Dec 21, 2004.

?

whats yoru opions

Poll closed Jan 15, 2005.
  1. yes they are responsible

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. no they are not

    11 vote(s)
    100.0%
  1. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    with the story i jsut posted about a distruaght mom sueing wally world for selling her daughter an shotgun she used to kill herself. and another one which i can not remember where it happened, but the gun manufacturer is was sued because they sold arms to a dealer who in-turn sold them to someone who commited murder. do you think manufacturers should be held liable for what customers do with thier weapons?
     
  2. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    that would be for the snipers, malvo and muhammed
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    no but personal injury lawyers don't go after the "bad" people--they go after the ones that can afford to pay.
     
  4. Jeff
    Offline

    Jeff Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Guns dont kill ppl , ppl killl ppl!!!! these Lawsuits will be the down fall of America, not just these but all Lawsuits, lets face it Wally world didnt make no one put a gun to there head, but they willl more than likely pay. Ppl have gotten so sue-happy it is unreal & sickening!!!
    :2guns:
    Jeff
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  5. fuzzykitten99
    Offline

    fuzzykitten99 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,965
    Thanks Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    You'll have to check the Marauder's Map...
    Ratings:
    +199
    holding gun mfrs responsible is like holding Chevy responsible for you running a red light or speeding. unless there is something mechanically wrong, nothing can happen unless SOMEONE operates it.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    exactly! its going to be a shame when we degenerate into bady cavity searches and everyones closets being cleaned out to find out the only reason you cant get a firearm is you cheated on a test when you were in third grade.
     
  7. Merlin
    Offline

    Merlin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    405
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, La.
    Ratings:
    +61
    "IF" this article were true, all the gun laws on the books are rendered moot. I personally don't believe any gun laws are legitimate.

    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/12/20/83626.shtml



    Guns Are An Individual Right
    Geoff Metcalf
    Monday, Dec. 20, 2004
    "The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."

    --Thomas Jefferson
    Story Continues Below



    Guess what? The Second Amendment, ("A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.") has, does, and will secure “an individual right to keep and bear arms.”
    You knew that. I knew that. However, a cabal of leftists remains in denial over what even their own Constitutional scholar had concluded.

    Notwithstanding the itching and moaning and gnashing of teeth from the left wing radical fringe, it is an empirical fact that our God given, inalienable right to keep and bear arms is FACT.

    The U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel has officially concluded the Second Amendment "secures an individual right to keep and bear arms." Duh! Despite having been dated Aug. 24, the 93-page document was just released.

    "Someone" delayed the release for apparent political reasons. This is passing strange considering even liberal Democrats acknowledge one of the key components that cost Al Gore his presidential dream was his having embraced the Chuck Schumer/Diane Fienstein/Babs Boxer anti-gun mantra.

    The belatedly released research notes, "Examination of the original meaning of the Amendment provides extensive reasons to conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right, and no persuasive basis for either the collective-right or quasi-collective-right views." As Second Amendment Foundation founder Alan M. Gottlieb observed, “Henceforth, all Americans will know that the claim by anti-gunners that the amendment only protects some mythical right of the states to form militias and National Guard units is an outright fraud."

    Please note the ‘allegedly unbiased’ mainstream hasn’t said “Jack” about this epiphany.

    Even, liberal darling and Harvard Constitutional Law Professor Laurence Tribe acknowledged the obvious in 1999 (and again the mainstream media silence was deafening).

    Tribe is arguably the most influential living American constitutional scholar. In 1999 he concluded, "the federal government may not disarm individual citizens without some unusually strong justification."

    Tribe confirmed it includes an individual right, "admittedly of uncertain scope," to "possess and use firearms in the defense of themselves and their homes."

    The personification of the Metcalf Bromide of “some people just don’t want to be confused with FACTS that contradict their preconceived opinions or prejudices” is, and has been, the ant-gun crowd.

    In 2002 when a legal brief was filed by the Justice Department declaring that this protection extends to an individual's right to keep and bear arms irrespective of their involvement in a state militia the gun control crowd threw a hissy fit. Sonic wedgie time: "The worst fears about Attorney General Ashcroft have come true: His extreme ideology on guns has now become government policy." said Mike Barnes, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

    The Second Amendment has never been about bird hunting or target shooting. Such leftist babble was disingenuous, duplicitous and an outrage to defend the indefensible.

    The fact is the Second Amendment was specifically intended to provide American citizens with the tools necessary to rise up and overthrow an abusive government. It was written by men who had just done that very thing.

    The first three battles of the American Revolution were not about taxation, or representation - or even the list of grievances delineated in the Declaration of Independence - rather over gun control.

    When Captain Parker faced off the British on the Green in Lexington it was to prevent the British from confiscating “powder and ball."

    "There should be no doubt," Gottlieb concluded, "that those who have campaigned for restrictive gun laws or outright gun bans have been working to rob Americans of a constitutional right, a civil right. The time has come for America to re-examine every restrictive federal and state firearms statute, every local ordinance and every regulation, and start erasing those that were written solely to infringe on the rights of individual, law-abiding citizens to peaceably own firearms of their choice, without ever again having to explain why." Despite his righteous indignation, I hope Alan isn’t holding his breath.

    It was again Thomas Jefferson who said, "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themsleves against tyranny in government."
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Wow, once again I find myself agreeing with Merlin. *checks forehead* I must be turning into a *GASP* liberal!
     
  9. Shattered
    Offline

    Shattered Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    If you're old enough to buy a gun, you're old enough to take full responsibility for the use of said gun. What you do with it isn't the manufacturers problem.
     
  10. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Amen!
     

Share This Page