geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
I think it has at times served well, and at other times been nothing more than an abomination of our government...
So do you take the good with the bad or toss the baby out with the bathwater?
and why?? Because the limitations and charges are not laid out in the constitution, which is what grants the federal government its power and boundaries..
Do you ever consider that the constitution was made specifically vague in recognition that it was impossible to articulate and cover every single facet of a nation as it grew?
and because we don't have those defined, the SC has acted like so many other politicians, and has expanded its power for its own gain
Which is inherent to any bureaucracy. I mean, the only other real solution is anarchy.
At any rate, I'd argue that M V. M took a SCOTUS that had a weak role in the country and gave it the power to be an equal branch of government, which is what the founders intended.
As for arms... it is indeed pretty simple.... there is nothing preventing states to define legal arms, as any and all powers not grated to the fed are grated to the states and/or the individuals... as for free speech, I am all for saying anything you want that does not infringe upon the rights of others, for one cannot exercise their rights at the expense of the rights of another
So a person could have, say, an M240B and you'd be fine with that? Do you think the average American wants that?
I won't argue your opinion, but my larger point is that there is plenty to argue about when it comes to the laws of the lands.
It's not "so easy a caveman can do it" after all.
Last edited: