toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Thread starter
- #61
What violence is endorsed by the Democratic Party in sufficient numbers to allow you to generalize it as a policy of the party as a whole?
Ahh, Bill Clinton went to Russia as a student on his Rhodes Scholarship to avoid the draft and Hillary openly studied and endorsed Alinsky as her mentor? The democratic party is known from leakers within to use the rules for radicals as a framework within to organize their talking points. All the violence at Trump rallies last year was known to be organized by specific people and organizations within the democratic party and all of the violence you see on campuses is fomented by Leftist teachers, just as the violence against police and rioting in streets in Baltimore, etc., was both tolerated if not encouraged and legitimized by Obama and Eric Holder and others such as the mayor of Baltimore. Every serial killer in recent years going as far back as Columbine and that movie house slaying to the other mass school shootings it turned out when later investigated, all had ties to either the democratic party, Leftist leaning, Obama supporter, etc., not that anyone planned those things but the people involved doing the violence all leaned to the left. None of them were conservative. Listen to many of the democrats in Washington get up there and rail against the GOP or Trump talking like they are worse than ISIS and are a blight on the planet that must be destroyed at all cost. Listen to many of the democratic supporters on this board talk about the GOP or Trump like they were a petulance on the Earth to be eradicated. All of it has a tone of implied violence if not outright action. Do you really think all these kids in college protesting, turning over cars, breaking windows all get the idea independently on their own? Even all the leaks within the intelligence agencies to the media trying to hurt Trump have an overtone of violence in that many of them did so at the expense of the nation harming the integrity of the government to advance a political agenda even if it meant committing a felony. To help get Obama reelected, Lois Lerner actively blocked many conservative organizations from becoming active. Black Panthers were sent out to some voting centers to intimidate voters. The difference between politics and war is the difference between discussion and violence, and ever-increasingly, the Left is turning to violence in some form as a way of intolerance and disagreement. Look at even the 'Resistance' movement! Resist what? The fact that we have a two-party system and one party won and the other lost? Look at the way late night comedy hosts and certain news people are using the extreme, vulgar and highly disrespectful language attacking the president while the audience applauds. Even when not engaged in overt violence, there is an implied violence in their tone, as if by merely winning an election, it was some act of war against them, even Hillary cannot bow out gracefully but has to go around the country promoting this fiction that the Trumps and the Russian government conspired to work together to overthrow her inevitable election. It is all a bunch of rubbish and is taking this country down a very dangerous ally for its future and its citizens. The Democratic party in these last 10-15 years has become increasingly radicalized and activist in manipulating minds especially the younger ones in the idea that one must revolt and ACT against some vague and ill-defined injustice of the opposing party as if it were some affront on them that anyone even thinks differently, with a sense of urgency. Even when violence is not organized and planned, it often gets inevitably implied as a legitimate option if not necessary choice. How? None of the overt violent actions of above was ever even denounced by the party leaders! At best, they just say nothing and let it continue. It even extends to the way many democrats boycotted Trump's inauguration and SOTU speech or how a bunch of students walked out at once on Pence in protest the other day. Conservatives and republicans don't do this sort of shit when the democrats win! The ideology is there and implied, and ultimately, democrats convince others they are part of some subgroup and everything is a matter of winning or losing at any cost, no longer a matter of right and wrong.