Blagger
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
I can't really think of another situation in which it would be appropriate to force someone to financially provide for someone else. Providing for someone else, other than your child, should really be a choice.afford it, you should and would do it, but no one can or should make you.
I'm not picking on you personally, FLGoldilocks. It's just that your post fits my question.
I know that this is most likely covered by various available insurance policies. But what if you were to permanently disable someone through an act of gross, avoidable negligence. To the extent that the victim is no longer able to work?
Like, for instance, the victim of vehicle/pedestrian collision where the guilty party was under the influence of alcohol.