What Conservatives(Repugs) Really Want

Simple response.

Tax breaks for corporations attract jobs. See: Boeing and Google brining 12,000 jobs to Charleston, SC instead of union, high tax states.

Unions suck money and efficiency from the market. See: Clear correlation between massive spike in American innovation and weath that goes along with a steady decline in union membership %'s over last 50 years.

The equation is simple for economic growth and innovation: Less unions, more tax breaks for corporations.

I know lefties absolutely despise this idea. But the hard, cold truth is that this is the formula for jobs. Its ugly. It's "inconvenient" (haha). But its true. Charelston , SC, is a perfect example. They're in a non-union state. They have low corporate taxes. And hence, large companies are brining thousands of jobs to the region amidst an economic slump.

It works folks. Wisconsin, New Jersey, California, Illinois, New York, Washington State, Oregon should all follow.

those jobs were elsewhere lost. That is INTERNAL PROTECTIONISM between states.
 
Simple response.

Tax breaks for corporations attract jobs. See: Boeing and Google brining 12,000 jobs to Charleston, SC instead of union, high tax states.

Unions suck money and efficiency from the market. See: Clear correlation between massive spike in American innovation and weath that goes along with a steady decline in union membership %'s over last 50 years.

The equation is simple for economic growth and innovation: Less unions, more tax breaks for corporations.

I know lefties absolutely despise this idea. But the hard, cold truth is that this is the formula for jobs. Its ugly. It's "inconvenient" (haha). But its true. Charelston , SC, is a perfect example. They're in a non-union state. They have low corporate taxes. And hence, large companies are brining thousands of jobs to the region amidst an economic slump.

It works folks. Wisconsin, New Jersey, California, Illinois, New York, Washington State, Oregon should all follow.

those jobs were elsewhere lost. That is INTERNAL PROTECTIONISM between states.

Is it? So it would be ILLEGAL since Commerce between the States is regulated by the Congress...
 
Simple response.

Tax breaks for corporations attract jobs. See: Boeing and Google brining 12,000 jobs to Charleston, SC instead of union, high tax states.

Unions suck money and efficiency from the market. See: Clear correlation between massive spike in American innovation and weath that goes along with a steady decline in union membership %'s over last 50 years.

The equation is simple for economic growth and innovation: Less unions, more tax breaks for corporations.

I know lefties absolutely despise this idea. But the hard, cold truth is that this is the formula for jobs. Its ugly. It's "inconvenient" (haha). But its true. Charelston , SC, is a perfect example. They're in a non-union state. They have low corporate taxes. And hence, large companies are brining thousands of jobs to the region amidst an economic slump.

It works folks. Wisconsin, New Jersey, California, Illinois, New York, Washington State, Oregon should all follow.

those jobs were elsewhere lost. That is INTERNAL PROTECTIONISM between states.

Is it? So it would be ILLEGAL since Commerce between the States is regulated by the Congress...

Actually, only EXTERNAL PROTECTIONISM (tarriffs) between states are prohibited
 
Ya gotta know that when the title of a thread has the word "Repugs" in it, that it's just going to be some psychotic, hate-filled, whirling-dervish rant spinning madly out of control. And so again, on this vast internet, for the 127,942,355,427th time, it has proved to be true.
 
George Lakoff: What Conservatives Really Want



"The central issue in our political life is not being discussed. At stake is the moral basis of American democracy.

The individual issues are all too real: assaults on unions, public employees, women's rights, immigrants, the environment, health care, voting rights, food safety, pensions, prenatal care, science, public broadcasting, and on and on.

Budget deficits are a ruse, as we've seen in Wisconsin, where the governor turned a surplus into a deficit by providing corporate tax breaks, and then used the deficit as a ploy to break the unions, not just in Wisconsin, but seeking to be the first domino in a nationwide conservative movement.

Deficits can be addressed by raising revenue, plugging tax loopholes, putting people to work, and developing the economy long-term in all the ways the president has discussed. But deficits are not what really matters to conservatives."


And you dumbass fucktards want us to believe government spending caused the deficits? That dumb motherfucking governor in Wisconsin wants to break the unions not fix the deficit, but to pay for more corporate tax cuts for the rich and big businesses.


The individual issues are all too real: assaults on unions, public employees, women's rights, immigrants, the environment, health care, voting rights, food safety, pensions, prenatal care, science, public broadcasting, and on and on.




Assults on unions.... Asking them to pay for some of their health care and pensions?
immigrants,...... Do you mean illegal aliens?
health care,.... Do you mean that joke Obama Care?
public broadcasting... Why does my tax money have to fund this?
women's rights,.... You probably mean the Left's love for abortions....again why should
my tax dollars go to fund this.

:eusa_hand:

You dumbfucking dipshit, federal employees do pay for their health insurance and pensions, the Repugs in charge want them to pay more of it out of their pockets. How fucking dumb are you, do we need to get one of those special education teachers who deal with mentally handicapped people to simplify it for you?

How can you possibly think you're helping your cause by being a jerk to random people you meet on the Internet? You're only hurting your cause, a lot, and if you can't see that, you clearly don't have the sense to be preaching anything to us.
 

Forum List

Back
Top