SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
- Thread starter
- #221
now you are telling us their experiments were done in a vacuum at zero Kelvin? hahahahaha
the gross flow of radiation from any object is kT^4. it is always there.
net flow is kT^4 minus the amount of radiation the object receives back from the environment.
Just stating what the equation represents....if you think that is funny...OK...but it is what the equation represents none the less and you know it.
As to net...prove mathematically that the equation is one that provides information about net radiation flow rather than gross radiation flow...you and I both know that if it were an equation providing information regarding net flows it would be constructed differently but go ahead and prove mathematically that it is calculating net flow....'
Or grow up enough to admit that you know it is an equation that calculates gross flow but that you disagree with it....which is closer to the truth, isn't it. You would rather lie about what the equations represent than allow that you have been making statements that you can't support...are you prepared to lie indefinitely?....because we both know that there is no mathematical proof that can make an equation for gross energy flow into one expressing net energy flow. Net is an assumption....an unobserved, unmeasured, untestable assumption....nothing more.