Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Well, to split a hair, I didn't express any sentiments in the first para. Just pointed out what current laws do and don't permit, and how they made no distinction between homosexuals and heterosexualsAbbey Normal said:Wow. Apart from the sentiments in your first paragraph, I've never heard anyone put it this way. I'm impressed with your logic and writing skills.
But the later paragraphs point out the real reason, IMHO, that same-sex-marriage initiatives keep getting voted down by huge majorities every time they are brought to a vote. People are instinctively repelled by the notion, except for the small minority who are homosexual. And we are no more likely to reverse that trend than to sweep back the tide.
The only way the homosexual advocates will be able to impose their agenda on the public, is thru the back door: by getting courts to misinterpret laws as "providing for unequal rights" or some other such malarkey. Unsurprisingly, this is where their main efforts lie. They know as well as the voters do, that the public will never submit to open homosexuality in public, willingly. Because they just plain DON'T LIKE IT. A feeling unlikely to change, for the reasons I gave above.