fyrenza
Ariel Looney
Amazing!
Top Secret America | washingtonpost.com
BUT,
check out this "disclaimer"...
It's mostly about the runaway spending that has been, and IS, going on since 9-11, and is quite an eyeopener.
Top Secret America | washingtonpost.com
BUT,
check out this "disclaimer"...
Because of the nature of this project, we allowed government officials to see the Web site several months ago and asked them to tell us of any specific concerns. They offered none at that time. As the project evolved, we shared the Web site's revised capabilities. Again, we asked for specific concerns. One government body objected to certain data points on the site and explained why; we removed those items. Another agency objected that the entire Web site could pose a national security risk but declined to offer specific comments.
We made other public safety judgments about how much information to show on the Web site. For instance, we used the addresses of company headquarters buildings, information which, in most cases, is available on companies' own Web sites, but we limited the degree to which readers can use the zoom function on maps to pinpoint those or other locations.
It's mostly about the runaway spending that has been, and IS, going on since 9-11, and is quite an eyeopener.
Last edited: