Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
What makes that so funny?
I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
Back in October, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon announced future plans to boost the lowest of wages at the big box giant so that no worker is paid the federally mandated minimum of $7.25 an hour.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
Sigh. does NO ONE bother to read? Now, why don't you look at the comment I QUOTED and was DIRECTLY responding to then you might just see why your comment makes no sense.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
I see. My bad. You were responding to "judicial review's" comment. I apologize for the mistake.Sigh. does NO ONE bother to read? Now, why don't you look at the comment I QUOTED and was DIRECTLY responding to then you might just see why your comment makes no sense.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
Well, its a rare poster here that will admit a mistake. Most of us are to hard headedI see. My bad. You were responding to "judicial review's" comment. I apologize for the mistake.Sigh. does NO ONE bother to read? Now, why don't you look at the comment I QUOTED and was DIRECTLY responding to then you might just see why your comment makes no sense.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
Well, its a rare poster here that will admit a mistake. Most of us are to hard headedI see. My bad. You were responding to "judicial review's" comment. I apologize for the mistake.Sigh. does NO ONE bother to read? Now, why don't you look at the comment I QUOTED and was DIRECTLY responding to then you might just see why your comment makes no sense.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.How will they change the law??? If they attempt it, they will be breaking the law.
Welcome to the board.
And? The OP really has almost nothing to do with min wage. It has to do with the fact that Wal-Mart is no longer going to pay it.Well, its a rare poster here that will admit a mistake. Most of us are to hard headedI see. My bad. You were responding to "judicial review's" comment. I apologize for the mistake.Sigh. does NO ONE bother to read? Now, why don't you look at the comment I QUOTED and was DIRECTLY responding to then you might just see why your comment makes no sense.I read the article. And, I just read it again. What do you see "asinine" about workers getting more money per hour?Did you bother reading the link? Of course not. Go back and click the hyper link and you might realize why what you just stated is completely asinine.
Welcome to the board.
minimum wage means fewer jobs, higher prices, and mistaken attitude about how to get ahead in life so net gain is possible. A liberal will lack the IQ to understand that there is no free lunch.
We will see if this ends up being a worthless stunt.