Waiting For Godot???

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,949
60,333
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
184 years and counting!!!


On this date, October 2nd, 1836, Charles Darwin returned to England.
1601646464676.png

"Charles Darwin's return to England
Naturalist Charles Darwin returned to England this day in 1836 after a five-year journey on the HMS Beagle, on which he gathered the specimens and observations that led to his theory of evolution by natural selection."
Britannica.com


As of this moment.....with more scientists feverishly at work than in all of history, not a single example of one species becoming another has been found.

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



The only question that remains is which will occur first......
.....whether Darwinism will be proven via the Scientific Method,.....

....or Hillary Clinton will clamber over the burgeoning mountain of empty cheap wine bottles in her Chappaqua Mansion, and take the oath as President.

1601647008340.png
 
The only question that remains is which will occur first......
.....whether Darwinism will be proven via the Scientific Method,.....
....or Hillary Clinton will clamber over the burgeoning mountain of empty cheap wine bottles in her Chappaqua Mansion, and take the oath as President.
PoliticalChic, you are an early morning certified laugh riot!! ... :lol: :lol: ... :thup:
 
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Complete transmutation? What's that supposed to mean? It's certainly not something Darwin or other evolutionary scientists claimed. Also, evolution has never been observed directly, because of the time spans involved. The only way scientific troglodytes have of criticizing evolutionary theory is by creating a straw-man to attack
 
184 years and counting!!!


On this date, October 2nd, 1836, Charles Darwin returned to England.
View attachment 396020
"Charles Darwin's return to England
Naturalist Charles Darwin returned to England this day in 1836 after a five-year journey on the HMS Beagle, on which he gathered the specimens and observations that led to his theory of evolution by natural selection."
Britannica.com


As of this moment.....with more scientists feverishly at work than in all of history, not a single example of one species becoming another has been found.

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



The only question that remains is which will occur first......
.....whether Darwinism will be proven via the Scientific Method,.....

....or Hillary Clinton will clamber over the burgeoning mountain of empty cheap wine bottles in her Chappaqua Mansion, and take the oath as President.

View attachment 396026
Your title is clickbait! I clicked expecting this
Gal Gadot
rs_600x600-200429120628-600-gal-gadot-gj-4-29-20.jpg
 
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Complete transmutation? What's that supposed to mean? It's certainly not something Darwin or other evolutionary scientists claimed. Also, evolution has never been observed directly, because of the time spans involved. The only way scientific troglodytes have of criticizing evolutionary theory is by creating a straw-man to attack


Really?

What did Darwin claim?

Not that one species becomes a new and different species?

Of course he did, you dunce.

And.....why is there still zero proof of his, and your, claims?
 
Last edited:
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Complete transmutation? What's that supposed to mean? It's certainly not something Darwin or other evolutionary scientists claimed. Also, evolution has never been observed directly, because of the time spans involved. The only way scientific troglodytes have of criticizing evolutionary theory is by creating a straw-man to attack


Really?

What did Darwin claim?

Not that one species becomes a new an different species?

Of course he did, you dunce.

And.....why is there still zero proof of his, and your, claims?



BTW.....there are lots of evolutionary theories.

I criticize the one government schooling claims is proven....Darwin's theory.
 
"If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands?" Milton Berle

Evolution is obvious and the historical and bone records show clearly the changes. Species are different and even human species changes are obvious, look only at a Maasai v Eskimo for an interesting adaptation. PC is always beating a dead horse. Even religions accept evolution.

For the reader not directly about evolution but a fascinating read.

"On Human Nature" by Edward O. Wilson

 
"If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands?" Milton Berle

Evolution is obvious and the historical and bone records show clearly the changes. Species are different and even human species changes are obvious, look only at a Maasai v Eskimo for an interesting adaptation. PC is always beating a dead horse. Even religions accept evolution.

For the reader not directly about evolution but a fascinating read.

"On Human Nature" by Edward O. Wilson




There are lots of theories of evolution.....but the one taught in neo-Marxist government school, as proven.....hasn't been.

But, it was a fav of Karl Marx....so, here it is.


. One of the first readers of 'On the Origin of Species' was Friedrich Engels, then living in Manchester. He wrote to Karl Marx: "Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect."
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "Marx-Engels Collected Works" , vol. 40, p. 441.


It is taught as proof of the religion of Militant Secularism, your religion.
 
"If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands?" Milton Berle

Evolution is obvious and the historical and bone records show clearly the changes. Species are different and even human species changes are obvious, look only at a Maasai v Eskimo for an interesting adaptation. PC is always beating a dead horse. Even religions accept evolution.

For the reader not directly about evolution but a fascinating read.

"On Human Nature" by Edward O. Wilson




There are lots of theories of evolution.....but the one taught in neo-Marxist government school, as proven.....hasn't been.

But, it was a fav of Karl Marx....so, here it is.


. One of the first readers of 'On the Origin of Species' was Friedrich Engels, then living in Manchester. He wrote to Karl Marx: "Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect."
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "Marx-Engels Collected Works" , vol. 40, p. 441.


It is taught as proof of the religion of Militant Secularism, your religion.
After what I've recently learned about demon possessed Marx, and their love of this theory, and the way this world has accepted it, that alone is proof enough to reject it.

"An evil tree cannot bear good fruit"--Jesus
 
Even religions accept evolution.
1.2 billion muslims don't accept evolution, and neither do many Christians. ... :cool:



It comes down to the corruption of government school.


Unless we can pry the schools from them, the Democrats/Liberals, as earlier American pried their slaves from them.....America is lost.
 

Forum List

Back
Top