CDZ US Population Estimates If Abortion Was Always Illegal

[GHook93]

I know the arguments abortion is the killing for a baby and I completely agree with that statement. At certain point very early in the process that proof that the fetus is a person is undeniable. I accept that. However, do the pro-life crowd care that the population of the world will become a big problem over the century? Take US. I think the estimates below are low. Nevertheless, 600 million people will make the dystopian future of Soylent Green will be a reality. NYC, LA and Chicago will have 30-40 mil inhabitants. Where will all the job be. Automation in the agriculture industry has severely limited employment in that industry and will continue to do so. Same with the manufacturing and assembly industries. In fact over the next century automation will continue to reduce employment in all fields white and blue. Yet the population has exploded. But I digress.

Do the prolife crowd worry about over-population?

The Socioeconomic Costs of Roe v. Wade - Ethics Public Policy Center

 

[rdean]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

 

[Penelope]

I fail to see the need for so many abortions, really that means people are having unprotected sex and are now a cost to the medical industry, HIV and Cervical Ca are not cheap to treat, and antibiotics for VD's are becoming non effective. I would talk someone out of abortion if I could but why that person got pg in the first place is the question. Abortion is not the answer.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Too many forms of birth control out there to be this many abortions. Be responsible to begin with, if you can't then don't procreate

 

[Darkwind]

I know the arguments abortion is the killing for a baby and I completely agree with that statement. At certain point very early in the process that proof that the fetus is a person is undeniable. I accept that. However, do the pro-life crowd care that the population of the world will become a big problem over the century? Take US. I think the estimates below are low. Nevertheless, 600 million people will make the dystopian future of Soylent Green will be a reality. NYC, LA and Chicago will have 30-40 mil inhabitants. Where will all the job be. Automation in the agriculture industry has severely limited employment in that industry and will continue to do so. Same with the manufacturing and assembly industries. In fact over the next century automation will continue to reduce employment in all fields white and blue. Yet the population has exploded. But I digress.

Do the prolife crowd worry about over-population?

The Socioeconomic Costs of Roe v. Wade - Ethics Public Policy Center

Have you even considered the fact that abortion isn't about population control, but about convenience?

 

[GHook93]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

If it just about rights of the mother vs baby's right, then the baby's rights should trump the mother's right everytime.

 

[william the wie]

The only argument in favor of abortion (not involving birth defects, rape or the life of the mother) that makes sense is the one the pro-choice crowd does not want to use:

psychopathic genes are being eliminated from the gene pool.

That argument implies that women who get abortions are born criminals, which is not a great advertisement for the practice.

 

[GHook93]

I know the arguments abortion is the killing for a baby and I completely agree with that statement. At certain point very early in the process that proof that the fetus is a person is undeniable. I accept that. However, do the pro-life crowd care that the population of the world will become a big problem over the century? Take US. I think the estimates below are low. Nevertheless, 600 million people will make the dystopian future of Soylent Green will be a reality. NYC, LA and Chicago will have 30-40 mil inhabitants. Where will all the job be. Automation in the agriculture industry has severely limited employment in that industry and will continue to do so. Same with the manufacturing and assembly industries. In fact over the next century automation will continue to reduce employment in all fields white and blue. Yet the population has exploded. But I digress.

Do the prolife crowd worry about over-population?

The Socioeconomic Costs of Roe v. Wade - Ethics Public Policy Center

Have you even considered the fact that abortion isn't about population control, but about convenience?

Very true but it has controlled stilled reduced the population.

 

[D Truth]

In 1960's a propaganda book was published, The population bomb, where Paul Ehrlich predicted that there would be worldwide famine by the 70's.

Well it didn't happen, and not because of baby killing being legalized... but because Ehrlich was full of crap.

The problem is not enough jobs or food... because the true equation is that more people = more people to farm, produce, work, and buy. Very logical equation really.

The problem the OP may really have is that if there are more people on the planet it becomes more difficult or even impossible for all of them to be controlled... correct?

 

[Spinster]

In 1960's a propaganda book was published, The population bomb, where Paul Ehrlich predicted that there would be worldwide famine by the 70's.

Well it didn't happen, and not because of baby killing being legalized... but because Ehrlich was full of crap.

The problem is not enough jobs or food... because the true equation is that more people = more people to farm, produce, work, and buy. Very logical equation really.

The problem the OP may really have is that if there are more people on the planet it becomes more difficult or even impossible for all of them to be controlled... correct?

There's an old saying that goes, "figures can lie, and liars can figure". Did you receive a D on your truth report card?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Women were having abortions long before Roe v. Wade, and had the Supreme Court not acknowledged the privacy rights of women abortions would have continued even if 'illegal'; the only difference is you wouldn't about it.

 

[IsaacNewton]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

And they don't. In fact, once your born the GOP gets itchy for the death penalty.

 

[D Truth]

Women were having abortions long before Roe v. Wade, and had the Supreme Court not acknowledged the privacy rights of women abortions would have continued even if 'illegal'; the only difference is you wouldn't about it.

I wouldn't what about it?


Yep Madam Restell was murdering people back in the day, she had a bizarre religious belief that "it's not a person until it's born, so lets chop 'em up and make a lot of money"... which is a stark contradiction to the Christian ethics of America at the time. Then fast forward to Blackmun's idiocy... basically he said: I don't know no biology so it's just better if we follow suit with a silly religious belief of "it's not a person until it's born, so lets chop 'em up and make a lot of money". And here we are now, where rational people understand biology to an remarkable degree versus those who's religious nonsense desperately holds onto a barbaric need to control everyone.

Cool thing is that reason always beats religion. Matter of time now and the religious are going to find themselves unable to control everyone - forever.

Correct?

 

[I amso IR]

In 1960's a propaganda book was published, The population bomb, where Paul Ehrlich predicted that there would be worldwide famine by the 70's.

Well it didn't happen, and not because of baby killing being legalized... but because Ehrlich was full of crap.

The problem is not enough jobs or food... because the true equation is that more people = more people to farm, produce, work, and buy. Very logical equation really.

The problem the OP may really have is that if there are more people on the planet it becomes more difficult or even impossible for all of them to be controlled... correct?

There's an old saying that goes, "figures can lie, and liars can figure". Did you receive a D on your truth report card?

I amso IR
OMG! The commies or socialists have really taken over? Truth report cards!! No more trut, the whole trut and nothing but the trut? The trut really does hurt! And besides, "You can't handle the truth"! Someone said that! Quiz time everyone.

 

[Moonglow]

I wonder what the world population would be like had God not aborted 99% of all humans?

 

[JoeMoma]

Women were having abortions long before Roe v. Wade, and had the Supreme Court not acknowledged the privacy rights of women abortions would have continued even if 'illegal'; the only difference is you wouldn't about it.

Most things that are illegal continue to happen. Should rape be made legal because it continues to happen anyway, even though it's currently illegal?

 

[JoeMoma]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

And they don't. In fact, once your born the GOP gets itchy for the death penalty.

GOP-- for the death penalty being applied to people convicted of the most terrible crimes through due process.
Democrats-- for the death penality for the most innocent among us, the unborn.

 

[IsaacNewton]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

And they don't. In fact, once your born the GOP gets itchy for the death penalty.

GOP-- for the death penalty being applied to people convicted of the most terrible crimes through due process.
Democrats-- for the death penality for the most innocent among us, the unborn.

In your mind, I'm sure that is what you believe. It is as ridiculous as Suckabee's disgusting statement re 'ovens'.

Conservatives pretend to have morals and character, that's all.

 

[JoeMoma]

It's not about population. It's about woman's rights.

And if Republicans believed in what they say, they would support the baby beyond being born. Not just before birth.

And they don't. In fact, once your born the GOP gets itchy for the death penalty.

GOP-- for the death penalty being applied to people convicted of the most terrible crimes through due process.
Democrats-- for the death penality for the most innocent among us, the unborn.

In your mind, I'm sure that is what you believe. It is as ridiculous as Suckabee's disgusting statement re 'ovens'.

Conservatives pretend to have morals and character, that's all.

How very Alinsky of you!

 

[ScienceRocks]

We don't need 50 million more people. 7.4 billion on this planet is a lot.