US experiencing most cases of gonorrhoea ,chlamydia and syphilis in recorded history

[Lysistrata]

The Trump administration has issued its final draft of a rule that makes sweeping changes to Title X, the federal program that provides birth control and other reproductive health services to millions of low-income Americans.

Under the new rule, posted Friday by the federal Department of Health and Human Services Office of Population Affairs, any organization that provides or refers patients for abortions is ineligible for Title X funding to cover STD prevention, cancer screenings and contraception. Federal funding for abortion already is illegal in most cases.

Title X does not cover abortions.

Isn't it amazing how fast the right to free speech gets tossed out the window. Not only is the organization prohibited from performing abortions, even though an abortion is a perfectly legal act, the organization cannot even refer a client to another facility. Other "gag rules" go so far as to prohibit any mention of it. Perhaps we need to educate people in the First Amendment, although it is hard to imagine that not everyone has heard about the right to free speech, given the amount of screaming about it.

No one is "prohibited" from doing a dam thing. These are just conditions they have to meet in order to qualify for government funds. All government funds have strings attached.

If Planned Parenthood wants to be a self funding outfit, independent of government control, they can refuse the money.

What is the reason for imposing these conditions in order to qualify for government funding? They obviously are not viewpoint-neutral.

The real purpose is to discourage Abortion. Lawmakers have a real problem with a socialist outfit like going into the nation's ghettos with a legion of Kermit Gosnells butchering a new generation

The government has no business discouraging abortion or anything else.

PP is not "socialist." It just serves everyone. Where did this nonsense about "going into the nation's ghettos with a legion of Kermit Gosnells butchering a new generation" come from? Gosnell was one guy who is now serving life in prison, so why the hysterics?

African-American women, like all other women, have a choice as to whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term. Unfortunately, African-American women have a higher rate of maternal deaths and complications from pregnancy, mostly due to lack of access to health care.

Are you idiots who are so concerned about "legions" of gosnells going to "ghettos" "butchering a new generation going to the "ghettos" to make sure that African-American women, who do not all live in "ghettos," get the vitamins and minerals necessary to construct a fully-formed human, a healthy diet, get regular medical checkups, and have opportunities to stay off their feet or get bed-rest, if necessary? You people are just sooooo caring.

 

[Penelope]

The Trump administration has issued its final draft of a rule that makes sweeping changes to Title X, the federal program that provides birth control and other reproductive health services to millions of low-income Americans.

Under the new rule, posted Friday by the federal Department of Health and Human Services Office of Population Affairs, any organization that provides or refers patients for abortions is ineligible for Title X funding to cover STD prevention, cancer screenings and contraception. Federal funding for abortion already is illegal in most cases.

Title X does not cover abortions.

Isn't it amazing how fast the right to free speech gets tossed out the window. Not only is the organization prohibited from performing abortions, even though an abortion is a perfectly legal act, the organization cannot even refer a client to another facility. Other "gag rules" go so far as to prohibit any mention of it. Perhaps we need to educate people in the First Amendment, although it is hard to imagine that not everyone has heard about the right to free speech, given the amount of screaming about it.

Yep, and I sure they have the anti abortion people going into those facilities and asking " they want an abortion and any referral would be great". How do they know?? They might just make it up!!

 

[Polishprince]

The government has no business discouraging abortion or anything else.
.

But they do, all the time.

That's the reason for the massive regulations and requirements in ultraliberal jurisdictions for firearms. Frustrate people who want to exercise their rights.

Ditto for the huge regulations put on smoking or drinking. Discourage people from engaging in these behaviors.

 

[Lysistrata]

The government has no business discouraging abortion or anything else.
.

But they do, all the time.

That's the reason for the massive regulations and requirements in ultraliberal jurisdictions for firearms. Frustrate people who want to exercise their rights.

Ditto for the huge regulations put on smoking or drinking. Discourage people from engaging in these behaviors.

So I take it that you are against government discouragement of abortion.

 

[Polishprince]

The government has no business discouraging abortion or anything else.
.

But they do, all the time.

That's the reason for the massive regulations and requirements in ultraliberal jurisdictions for firearms. Frustrate people who want to exercise their rights.

Ditto for the huge regulations put on smoking or drinking. Discourage people from engaging in these behaviors.

So I take it that you are against government discouragement of abortion.

You take it wrong.

As long as the government is discouraging other things like firearms, or cigarette smoking, discouraging the Abortion Trade is perfectly legit.

 

[Lysistrata]

It's

The government has no business discouraging abortion or anything else.
.

But they do, all the time.

That's the reason for the massive regulations and requirements in ultraliberal jurisdictions for firearms. Frustrate people who want to exercise their rights.

Ditto for the huge regulations put on smoking or drinking. Discourage people from engaging in these behaviors.

So I take it that you are against government discouragement of abortion.

You take it wrong.

As long as the government is discouraging other things like firearms, or cigarette smoking, discouraging the Abortion Trade is perfectly legit.

It's not a "trade" or an "industry." There are legitimate public-health reasons for regulating firearms and cigarettes, but government should not be in the business of imposing sectarian religious views on the entire population. Obviously, people who choose to have abortions, participate in performing them, or identify as pro-choice disagree with these views. Government must remain viewpoint-neutral.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What else can be expected? The right-wingers have been loudly against teaching people how to protect themselves from such things. They want to keep people ignorant about everything pertaining to sex. They have defrauded the American taxpayer out of millions for "abstinence only" education in place of actual education. STDs and unwanted pregnancies are the result, results that they never will take responsibility for.

Are you insane? How do you explain centuries of lower rates of STD’s without the advantage of antibiotics?
Another fucking nihilist democrat sheeple.

Centuries? I doubt that for sure. Even the Civil War generals were worried about their troups contracting it. Mercury was used as a treatment for syphilis for centuries. Nihilist? Nonsense.

It The Progs Fault
Mostly The Feminists Turning Little Girls Into THOTs
Encouraging The Feminism Of Men And Boys
Deluding Women Into Thinking They Can Do It All
With Their Broken Homes, And Resulting Inmate Children
Where They Learn To Do It On The Down-Low

This doesn't have anything more to do with women than it does with men. Women are not any more promiscuous than men are. In fact, they are probably less. Remember, your "president" worried about contracting STDs during the time he was dodging the draft, being a famous slut. There are lots of stories out there of one spouse (more often, the male) bringing home these "presents" to the other spouse, like in India, where male truck drivers brought home HIV to their wives, and the British woman, the subject of a BBC video story, who was told she had HIV two years after her husband died, and she had never been unfaithful to him.

A war zone is not normal circumstances.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Homo men are still the most serious risk.
More CDC stats...

STDs in Men Who Have Sex with Men - 2017 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance

I wondered if the control of AIDS might have something to do with it.

When you say ‘control’ do you man as a statistical group or do you mean AIDS has been controlled?

 

[Lysistrata]

What else can be expected? The right-wingers have been loudly against teaching people how to protect themselves from such things. They want to keep people ignorant about everything pertaining to sex. They have defrauded the American taxpayer out of millions for "abstinence only" education in place of actual education. STDs and unwanted pregnancies are the result, results that they never will take responsibility for.

Are you insane? How do you explain centuries of lower rates of STD’s without the advantage of antibiotics?
Another fucking nihilist democrat sheeple.

Centuries? I doubt that for sure. Even the Civil War generals were worried about their troups contracting it. Mercury was used as a treatment for syphilis for centuries. Nihilist? Nonsense.

It The Progs Fault
Mostly The Feminists Turning Little Girls Into THOTs
Encouraging The Feminism Of Men And Boys
Deluding Women Into Thinking They Can Do It All
With Their Broken Homes, And Resulting Inmate Children
Where They Learn To Do It On The Down-Low

This doesn't have anything more to do with women than it does with men. Women are not any more promiscuous than men are. In fact, they are probably less. Remember, your "president" worried about contracting STDs during the time he was dodging the draft, being a famous slut. There are lots of stories out there of one spouse (more often, the male) bringing home these "presents" to the other spouse, like in India, where male truck drivers brought home HIV to their wives, and the British woman, the subject of a BBC video story, who was told she had HIV two years after her husband died, and she had never been unfaithful to him.

A war zone is not normal circumstances.

So what? This discussion does not have much to do with war zones. New York, India, Britain were not, and are not war zones. Moreover, I thought that one is supposed to retain one's "purity" at all costs. The Roman Catholic Church even made a saint out of a young woman who supposedly chose death when threatened with rape. Apparently, it is preferable to do so instead of enduring a sex crime and living to tell about it and fight another day. What kind of a message is this?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What else can be expected? The right-wingers have been loudly against teaching people how to protect themselves from such things. They want to keep people ignorant about everything pertaining to sex. They have defrauded the American taxpayer out of millions for "abstinence only" education in place of actual education. STDs and unwanted pregnancies are the result, results that they never will take responsibility for.

Are you insane? How do you explain centuries of lower rates of STD’s without the advantage of antibiotics?
Another fucking nihilist democrat sheeple.

Centuries? I doubt that for sure. Even the Civil War generals were worried about their troups contracting it. Mercury was used as a treatment for syphilis for centuries. Nihilist? Nonsense.

It The Progs Fault
Mostly The Feminists Turning Little Girls Into THOTs
Encouraging The Feminism Of Men And Boys
Deluding Women Into Thinking They Can Do It All
With Their Broken Homes, And Resulting Inmate Children
Where They Learn To Do It On The Down-Low

This doesn't have anything more to do with women than it does with men. Women are not any more promiscuous than men are. In fact, they are probably less. Remember, your "president" worried about contracting STDs during the time he was dodging the draft, being a famous slut. There are lots of stories out there of one spouse (more often, the male) bringing home these "presents" to the other spouse, like in India, where male truck drivers brought home HIV to their wives, and the British woman, the subject of a BBC video story, who was told she had HIV two years after her husband died, and she had never been unfaithful to him.

A war zone is not normal circumstances.

So what? This discussion does not have much to do with war zones. New York, India, Britain were not, and are not war zones. Moreover, I thought that one is supposed to retain one's "purity" at all costs. The Roman Catholic Church even made a saint out of a young woman who supposedly chose death when threatened with rape. Apparently, it is preferable to do so instead of enduring a sex crime and living to tell about it and fight another day. What kind of a message is this?

So what? Male sexuality is different from female. Men who are not in a situation with a guaranteed sex supply (marriage) were expected to rely on temporary substitutes. Men in isolated situations or war zones were in unique circumstances. Not an accurate example.

 

[Lysistrata]

What else can be expected? The right-wingers have been loudly against teaching people how to protect themselves from such things. They want to keep people ignorant about everything pertaining to sex. They have defrauded the American taxpayer out of millions for "abstinence only" education in place of actual education. STDs and unwanted pregnancies are the result, results that they never will take responsibility for.

Are you insane? How do you explain centuries of lower rates of STD’s without the advantage of antibiotics?
Another fucking nihilist democrat sheeple.

Centuries? I doubt that for sure. Even the Civil War generals were worried about their troups contracting it. Mercury was used as a treatment for syphilis for centuries. Nihilist? Nonsense.

It The Progs Fault
Mostly The Feminists Turning Little Girls Into THOTs
Encouraging The Feminism Of Men And Boys
Deluding Women Into Thinking They Can Do It All
With Their Broken Homes, And Resulting Inmate Children
Where They Learn To Do It On The Down-Low

This doesn't have anything more to do with women than it does with men. Women are not any more promiscuous than men are. In fact, they are probably less. Remember, your "president" worried about contracting STDs during the time he was dodging the draft, being a famous slut. There are lots of stories out there of one spouse (more often, the male) bringing home these "presents" to the other spouse, like in India, where male truck drivers brought home HIV to their wives, and the British woman, the subject of a BBC video story, who was told she had HIV two years after her husband died, and she had never been unfaithful to him.

A war zone is not normal circumstances.

So what? This discussion does not have much to do with war zones. New York, India, Britain were not, and are not war zones. Moreover, I thought that one is supposed to retain one's "purity" at all costs. The Roman Catholic Church even made a saint out of a young woman who supposedly chose death when threatened with rape. Apparently, it is preferable to do so instead of enduring a sex crime and living to tell about it and fight another day. What kind of a message is this?

So what? Male sexuality is different from female. Men who are not in a situation with a guaranteed sex supply (marriage) were expected to rely on temporary substitutes. Men in isolated situations or war zones were in unique circumstances. Not an accurate example.

Male sexuality and female sexuality are not very different at all, it's just a deeply ingrained cultural stereotype that men and women are so different.

Another question regards people's commitment to "religious" values.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Are you insane? How do you explain centuries of lower rates of STD’s without the advantage of antibiotics?
Another fucking nihilist democrat sheeple.

Centuries? I doubt that for sure. Even the Civil War generals were worried about their troups contracting it. Mercury was used as a treatment for syphilis for centuries. Nihilist? Nonsense.

It The Progs Fault
Mostly The Feminists Turning Little Girls Into THOTs
Encouraging The Feminism Of Men And Boys
Deluding Women Into Thinking They Can Do It All
With Their Broken Homes, And Resulting Inmate Children
Where They Learn To Do It On The Down-Low

This doesn't have anything more to do with women than it does with men. Women are not any more promiscuous than men are. In fact, they are probably less. Remember, your "president" worried about contracting STDs during the time he was dodging the draft, being a famous slut. There are lots of stories out there of one spouse (more often, the male) bringing home these "presents" to the other spouse, like in India, where male truck drivers brought home HIV to their wives, and the British woman, the subject of a BBC video story, who was told she had HIV two years after her husband died, and she had never been unfaithful to him.

A war zone is not normal circumstances.

So what? This discussion does not have much to do with war zones. New York, India, Britain were not, and are not war zones. Moreover, I thought that one is supposed to retain one's "purity" at all costs. The Roman Catholic Church even made a saint out of a young woman who supposedly chose death when threatened with rape. Apparently, it is preferable to do so instead of enduring a sex crime and living to tell about it and fight another day. What kind of a message is this?

So what? Male sexuality is different from female. Men who are not in a situation with a guaranteed sex supply (marriage) were expected to rely on temporary substitutes. Men in isolated situations or war zones were in unique circumstances. Not an accurate example.

Male sexuality and female sexuality are not very different at all, it's just a deeply ingrained cultural stereotype that men and women are so different.

Another question regards people's commitment to "religious" values.

Welcome to 1965, eh?
Men and women have different sexualities and drives. Until lefties get out of the 1960’s and honor that fact we can’t make any progress.