Univ of Colorado 9/11 Debate!!

[PhysicsExist]

5:00 pm Sunday, March 6, 2011
University of Colorado - Boulder
University Memorial Center, Room 235
1669 Euclid Ave.
Boulder, CO
BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11

GOOGLE: WTC 7
AE911Truth.org
Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » FF 911 Truth
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
AE911Truth.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

 

[Gamolon]

5:00 pm Sunday, March 6, 2011
University of Colorado - Boulder
University Memorial Center, Room 235
1669 Euclid Ave.
Boulder, CO
BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11

GOOGLE: WTC 7
AE911Truth.org
Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » FF 911 Truth
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
AE911Truth.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

You claim WTC7 was demolished with explosives and that the columns were cut which lead to free fall.

If that is the case, why was there .8 seconds of no free fall before it started? If the columns were "removed", free fall should have started at that instant, not wait .8 seconds.

Please explain.

 

[candycorn]

5:00 pm Sunday, March 6, 2011
University of Colorado - Boulder
University Memorial Center, Room 235
1669 Euclid Ave.
Boulder, CO
BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11

GOOGLE: WTC 7
AE911Truth.org
Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » FF 911 Truth
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
AE911Truth.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

You claim WTC7 was demolished with explosives and that the columns were cut which lead to free fall.

If that is the case, why was there .8 seconds of no free fall before it started? If the columns were "removed", free fall should have started at that instant, not wait .8 seconds.

Please explain.

I'm guessing box boy gage got his ass handed to him since pe/cd isn't here posting links.

 

[Gamolon]

Cat got your tongue PhysicsExist?

Eots?

Come on you self proclaimed physics experts. Let's see what you got.

The columns were cut with explosives/thermite and the facade started to fall. According to you when there is not resistance, free fall occurs.

If the column were cut (hence no resistance) why did the facade take .8 seconds to START free fall?

 

[PhysicsExist]

Why would NIST want to say Building 7 did not experience free fall? NIST’s lead technical investigator, Shyam Sunder, stated in the WTC 7 technical briefing that free fall could only happen when an object “has no structural components below it.”[ii] The only way for a building to have no structural components below it is to remove the lower structural components with an external force such as explosives. If the upper part of a building is crushing its lower structural components, in other words, doing the work of removing them, not all of its energy will be converted into motion and its descent will not be free fall.

A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.

Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related]YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)[/ame]

 

[Mr. Jones]

5:00 pm Sunday, March 6, 2011
University of Colorado - Boulder
University Memorial Center, Room 235
1669 Euclid Ave.
Boulder, CO
BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11

GOOGLE: WTC 7
AE911Truth.org
Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » FF 911 Truth
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
AE911Truth.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

You claim WTC7 was demolished with explosives and that the columns were cut which lead to free fall.

If that is the case, why was there .8 seconds of no free fall before it started? If the columns were "removed", free fall should have started at that instant, not wait .8 seconds.

Please explain.

There are many videos of CDs in which one hears the explosives going off, and then a split second later the building collapses. What the fuck is you're point? Also, it would be helpful in answering your question if you would give a link to where this question arises from.
You have been told in previous responses that a slight delay is not unusual. NIST changed it's report from one of a no free fall theory to one of admitting 2.25 secs. of free fall, apparently they didn't have a question concerning this .08 seconds you keep harping about.

How about you answer why the N tower didn't collapse in 1975, or why in more severe fires in hirises, no collapse ever happened, producing free fall speeds?
If Mr. Chandlers assessment of the free fall times made NIST change their report, who the fuck are you to challenge it? Only some nitwit that thinks the WTC 7 building didn't fall essentially straight down
.08 seconds of non free fall? Give it up, the fucking collapse produced 2.25 secs. of free fall-end of story. Now what removed all those columns and beams to produce it?
Answer that asswipe.

 

[Mr. Jones]

5:00 pm Sunday, March 6, 2011
University of Colorado - Boulder
University Memorial Center, Room 235
1669 Euclid Ave.
Boulder, CO
BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11

GOOGLE: WTC 7
AE911Truth.org
Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » FF 911 Truth
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
AE911Truth.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

You claim WTC7 was demolished with explosives and that the columns were cut which lead to free fall.

If that is the case, why was there .8 seconds of no free fall before it started? If the columns were "removed", free fall should have started at that instant, not wait .8 seconds.

Please explain.

I'm guessing box boy gage got his ass handed to him since pe/cd isn't here posting links.

Here is the link to the archived debate for anyone that is truly interested.

Sunday_Live Radio Broadcast_Univ. Colo. Boulder Debate: 9/11 WTC Destruction | NO LIES RADIO