Bleipriester
Freedom!
- Thread starter
- #121
7600 - 12000 Iraqi losses and 4500 Coalition losses.Its already somewhere in the thread.It was in one of your sources. Now you got the correct ones. There was no reason to jump around like an angry ape.I have proven that there was strong Iraqi resistance.
Unfortunately you said "Almost all of the 40.000 sorties were A-10 CAS missions"
Which is still a lie, no matter how you want to distract from it.
Do you really work that way. Does your mind actually say to you "well I got caught lying, rather than admit I lied and move on, lets throw out more lies and distractions"..
But I am curious. Of major wars, when talking resistance one obvious and rather simple way would be comparing casualties by side. Looking at the US wars vs. Iraq and comparing them to other wars of the past 75 years, where does that resistance rank? Like WWII Axis powers killed about 2 allied for every Axis soldier lost. A strong resistance for sure there.
For the Iraqi armies, how did their resistance work out? How well did the 4th largest army in the world fight back? How well did they resist with their air power? How strong was their opposition to the US navy bombardments? How did their massive armored division hold up in resistance?
Will you now deny these figures?
You are not defending your lie. Again. Thanks.
And what source are you claiming I used about world war II deaths earlier? Please post that. otherwise I will just assume that you believe that lying to defend a lie is acceptable.
I never made any other claim about WWII deaths outside of the 2:1.
But now that we're both on the same page for what constitutes a strong resistance, what were those in the wars against the Iraq government.
Checked every post I made on the thread. Not there.
I think I am getting a picture... Not so much lies but hallucinations and possibly schizophrenia. Definitely some sort of delusion. I am sorry for your sickness and hope you find the help you need.