- Thread starter
- #161
the problem with pro-AGW science is that it is too often influenced by the scientists looking for evidence to support their preformed conclusions rather than examining the evidence and then making conclusions that fit the overall conditions.
things like the hockey stick graph go against written history that was put down by people with no interest in this debate. just because Michael Mann found an obscure and incorrect mathematical method that twisted the equivical evidence of proxy data into his preferred history, that does not mean we should ignore the other interpretations produced by more standard methodologies that are buttressed by writen history.
a more recent problem is the troubling revisions being done to the temperature histories. I had hoped that the BEST dataset was going to straighten things out but instead they seem to have added yet another methodology to twist things around. the method of chopping up the data and excluding outlying points has been used to mold the shape of the graphs, often at the expense of reality.
got changed to
this has happened in just the last few months. the temp record doesnt match up with the reality of what happened!! Iceland suffered hardship and decreased production when the temps dipped so they know it really happened but GHCN and GISS have cut and homogenized it out of existence.
things like the hockey stick graph go against written history that was put down by people with no interest in this debate. just because Michael Mann found an obscure and incorrect mathematical method that twisted the equivical evidence of proxy data into his preferred history, that does not mean we should ignore the other interpretations produced by more standard methodologies that are buttressed by writen history.
a more recent problem is the troubling revisions being done to the temperature histories. I had hoped that the BEST dataset was going to straighten things out but instead they seem to have added yet another methodology to twist things around. the method of chopping up the data and excluding outlying points has been used to mold the shape of the graphs, often at the expense of reality.
got changed to
this has happened in just the last few months. the temp record doesnt match up with the reality of what happened!! Iceland suffered hardship and decreased production when the temps dipped so they know it really happened but GHCN and GISS have cut and homogenized it out of existence.