Osiris-ODS
Diamond Member
- Jan 22, 2019
- 3,664
- 3,335
- 1,940
. . .
In THIS CASE, after the IG investigated the complaint and found actual evidence to support the complaint, the IG determined that this WB complaint, had some legs to it... was credible and urgent, and had to go to the Intelligence committee in Congress, according to the law.
(any credible, designated URGENT complaint, must go to Congress within 7 days of the IG report, under the law)
As I already stated above, the phrase "credible and urgent" is a statutory term--not the ICIG's own words--and it has a very low bar. It does not require evidence, but merely requires that the conduct alleged align with the legal elements of the alleged wrongdoing.
I'm trying to help with this discussion from a legal perspective, but you seem to be making things up at this point to fit whatever point you want to make and ignoring my posts when they don't fit with your position, so I'm going to stop wasting my time here. It's very frustrating trying to have a productive discussion (and perhaps help shed some light on a complex subject) with someone who has no interest in being open minded and objective.