U.S. Intelligence Community Knows Syria did not drop chemical weapons

[montelatici]

From "Intel Today"

"Donald Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened.

1. The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.
2. The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.
3. The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.
4. There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.
5. We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.

There are members of the U.S. military who were aware this strike would occur and it was recorded. There is a film record. At least the Defense Intelligence Agency knows that this was not a chemical weapon attack. In fact, Syrian military chemical weapons were destroyed with the help of Russia.

Patrick LANG COL. USA, Ret. (former DIA)"

Former DIA Colonel: “US strikes on Syria based on a lie”

 

[Vikrant]

(CNN)New airstrikes have targeted a town in northwest Syria that was hit by a deadly chemical attack earlier this week, activists said.

It wasn't immediately clear who conducted the strikes on Khan Sheikhoun, which was hit on Friday and Saturday, though only Russian and Syrian regime aircraft have been bombing that area of rebel-held Idlib province.

The latest attacks follow a strike early Friday by the United States on a Syrian airbase. The US blames Syria for Tuesday's chemical attack, which left more than 85 people dead and hundreds more injured.

The new strikes came as Russia, the Syrian regime's main ally, sent a frigate armed with cruise missiles to a Syrian port in an apparent show of force in response to the US strike.

...

Syria strikes: Site of chemical attack hit again - CNN.com

 

[Marion Morrison]

Who fell for the false flag BS? Is the question.

 

[montelatici]

Many Americans (and I am an American) seem to have fallen for it. It's like they don't remember the Iraq WMDs, the Gulf of Tonkin etc.

 

[xyz]

Don't if there were or not chemical weapons, but Trump is a Raytheon investor (the company that makes missiles):
Donald Trump personally profited from missile-maker Raytheon’s stock jump after his Syria attack

 

[irosie91]

From "Intel Today"

"Donald Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened.

1. The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.
2. The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.
3. The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.
4. There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.
5. We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.

There are members of the U.S. military who were aware this strike would occur and it was recorded. There is a film record. At least the Defense Intelligence Agency knows that this was not a chemical weapon attack. In fact, Syrian military chemical weapons were destroyed with the help of Russia.

Patrick LANG COL. USA, Ret. (former DIA)"

Former DIA Colonel: “US strikes on Syria based on a lie”

ROFLMAO------monte imagines that CLOUDS OF CHLORINE GAS can travel
miles------undissipated to dissolve the lungs of children MILES AWAY. The statement that any physical contact with sarin results in INSTANT DEATH is
absurd. Sarin is an anticholinergic------it is not cyanide down the throat

 

[montelatici]

ROFLMAO, Irosie bullshitting again.

"It is estimated that chlorine can travel up to 25 miles downwind from a single ruptured tank car on a windy day. "

Are You Prepared For a Chlorine Attack? | Firehouse

A half-hour is pretty instant to me. LOL

Inhalation of a high dose -- say 200 milligrams of sarin -- may cause death "within a couple of minutes," with no time even for symptoms to develop, according to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

Exposure through the skin takes longer to kill and the first symptoms may not occur for half an hour, followed by a quick progression.

Read more at:
Sarin: Lethal nerve gas that kills in minutes - The Economic Times

 

[irosie91]

ROFLMAO, Irosie bullshitting again.

"It is estimated that chlorine can travel up to 25 miles downwind from a single ruptured tank car on a windy day. "

Are You Prepared For a Chlorine Attack? | Firehouse

A half-hour is pretty instant to me. LOL

Inhalation of a high dose -- say 200 milligrams of sarin -- may cause death "within a couple of minutes," with no time even for symptoms to develop, according to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

Exposure through the skin takes longer to kill and the first symptoms may not occur for half an hour, followed by a quick progression.

Read more at:
Sarin: Lethal nerve gas that kills in minutes - The Economic Times

the chlorine gas has to be HIGHLY CONCENTRATED in order to dissolve the lungs in a manner useful to Baathist pigs----- Inhalation of sarin is not the same as
a DROP ON THE HAND. Anti cholinergics are USED in medical practice without
killing anyone. I have handled anti cholinergics without DYING----and even dropped such solutions on HUMANS and injected them into human blood vessels. As to chlorine-----you are subjected to chlorine gas every time you swim in a public
swimming pool-------in fact when you take a bath using the public water system---
it is a matter of CONCENTRATION. If you recall with your inadequate little brain-----when sarin was used in terrorism in the far east it was shot into TUNNELS----
because in tunnels it remained concentrated----ENOUGH TO KILL ------it was not shot upon cities from mountain tops.

 

[yiostheoy]

Everyone knows its a lie.

Did you get fooled ??

 

[Meane]

....And the wind was blowing....

Reminds one of the good old second world war stories.... It wasn't a bomb, you fool, it was food we sent, we heard you were starving. It exploded on your faces? My friend, why would you say something like that?

 

[skye]

it walks looks behaves like a false flag

it Is a false flag

it was an accident it was never meant to happen.

 

[frigidweirdo]

From "Intel Today"

"Donald Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened.

1. The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.
2. The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.
3. The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.
4. There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.
5. We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.

There are members of the U.S. military who were aware this strike would occur and it was recorded. There is a film record. At least the Defense Intelligence Agency knows that this was not a chemical weapon attack. In fact, Syrian military chemical weapons were destroyed with the help of Russia.

Patrick LANG COL. USA, Ret. (former DIA)"

Former DIA Colonel: “US strikes on Syria based on a lie”

And the problem here is how do we know? Who do you believe on such an issue.

Is Assad ruthless enough to use chemical weapons? Yes.
Are ISIS ruthless enough to use chemical weapons? Yes.

Would the US make up stories to gain an advantage? Yes
Would the Russians make up stories to gain an advantage? Yes.

So... where do we stand? In the middle without much of a clue.

 

[irosie91]

it walks looks behaves like a false flag

it Is a false flag

it was an accident it was never meant to happen.

huh? is was an accidental false flag?

 

[Vikrant]

Eric Trump Says Syria Strike Was Swayed By ‘Heartbroken’ Ivanka

Donald Trump's decision to bomb Syria was influenced by his daughter, Ivanka, being "heartbroken and outraged" at the country's alleged chemical weapons attack, one of the president's sons told a British newspaper.

The president launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian government air base he alleged was involved in a chemical weapons attack that killed dozens of civilians last week.

Trump's 33-year-old son, Eric, told The Daily Telegraph on Monday that the strike was influenced in part by Ivanka, who he said was "heartbroken and outraged" by the chemical attack.

...

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/eric-trump-says

 

[irosie91]

Eric Trump Says Syria Strike Was Swayed By ‘Heartbroken’ Ivanka

Donald Trump's decision to bomb Syria was influenced by his daughter, Ivanka, being "heartbroken and outraged" at the country's alleged chemical weapons attack, one of the president's sons told a British newspaper.

The president launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian government air base he alleged was involved in a chemical weapons attack that killed dozens of civilians last week.

Trump's 33-year-old son, Eric, told The Daily Telegraph on Monday that the strike was influenced in part by Ivanka, who he said was "heartbroken and outraged" by the chemical attack.

can't access your citation, VIK

...

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/eric-trump-says

 

[Vikrant]

^ Here it is again:

Eric Trump says his father was swayed by ‘heartbroken’ Ivanka to strike Syria

 

[irosie91]

^ Here it is again:

Eric Trump says his father was swayed by ‘heartbroken’ Ivanka to strike Syria

as is OFTEN the case-----the comment----IVANKA did it------reflects news paper
men's tendency to SENSATIONALIZE--------the article clearly states that DONALD,
himself was deeply affected by the DOCUMENTED evidence of children injured by
the poison gas------Seems to me he did not really REQUIRE some arm-twisting from
his daughter