Tx Gov Greg Abbott to pardon wrongly convicted Daniel Perry…Jose Garza, Soros backed DA withheld exculpatory evidence


This is great news! What a miscarriage of justice!

Lefties are sick in the head. Lefties, read the affidavit of the LEAD INVESTIGATOR. NOW THE DA SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME.


SO FOS.
AFFIDAVIT doesn't mean shit.
Testifying does.

More on this whack job.

FtM2fP4WwAEVoSr
 
Not "some guy" the lead detective had 158 pages of PowerPoint proving SGT Perry was justified. The DA only allowed 56 pages. All those the DA don't allow proved justifiable.

That was in the affidavit which you still haven't read
BUT........NEVER testified, why is that?
 
Affidavit is the written version of swearing under oath to tell the truth, just as if you were testifying in a courtroom.
NO, it isn't.
You can't go to jail for lying on an affidavit.
You will for lying under oath, in a courtroom.
So yeah this is pretty serious and not good for the Soros DA
Sure........just like Giuliani's "affidavits".
 
NO, it isn't.
You can't go to jail for lying on an affidavit.
You will for lying under oath, in a courtroom.

Sure........just like Giuliani's "affidavits".


You were saying?
 


You were saying?
Doesn't matter.
Anyone can claim their affidavit was altered.
 
An affidavit is sworn before a magistrate, judge or officer of the court

Keep proving you don't know shit
BS,
Rudy had 1,000's of affidavits he presented to the court.
ANY two bit lawyer IS an officer of the court, dumbass.

officer of the court
n. any person who has an obligation to promote justice and effective operation of the judicial system, including judges, the attorneys who appear in court, bailiffs, clerks and other personnel. As officers of the court lawyers have an absolute ethical duty to tell judges the truth, including avoiding dishonesty or evasion about reasons the attorney or his/her client is not appearing, the location of documents and other matters related to conduct of the courts.
 
Why would the lead detective be escaping jail time idiot?
Because, moron.
He never testified that he was coerced to suppress evidence, he only stated it in an affidavit.
As a detective he should have known better, should have told someone authoritative, not related to the case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top