Twisting History

[theim]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/dwest.htm

W Going to even more perverse lengths to prostrate himself and America before the Religion of Headchoppery.

Twisting history
By Diana West
October 21, 2005


Big week for Uncle Sam. First, there was the referendum on the new Iraqi constitution, which, by the way, contains all provisions necessary for a sharia-ruled state. Then, at the president's by-now-annual Ramadan dinner, President Bush announced, "For the first time in our nation's history, we have added a Koran to the White House Library."
Anything wrong with this undoubtedly historic picture? Freedom marches on in Iraq, and tolerance expands its reach at home, or so they say. But I would put it this way: Democracy marches on in Iraq, and the Koran expands its reach at home.
Same thing? Not at all. But no one is supposed to consider the difference. So what if Article 2 in the Iraqi constitution states, "no law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established." If people participate in an election for anything -- including sharia, including Hamas -- it's the Spirit of '76 all over again, or so our leaders say. Never mind that worried Iraqi Christians, concerned for religious freedom, say they're likely to ask Pope Benedict XVI to intervene. Meanwhile, according to the Bush Happy Face Doctrine, if any religious book goes onto the White House shelf, including one that's uniquely venomous toward "infidel" non-believers, it's a Hallelujah moment.
Is it just me, or does the president's gesture of inclusion sock the rest of us in the head? Fun-loving, peacenik Muslims aside, the Koran is indisputably the favorite book of Osama bin Laden, Abu Musab Zarqawi, the killers of Daniel Pearl, Hamas bus bombers, London Underground bombers and anyone who has ever hidden an IED on an Iraqi road to kill or maim an American soldier -- none of which is the best recommendation for White House honors.
But maybe the president meant he would now be reading the Koran. He could start with Chapter 5, Verse 32, which he's taken to quoting as, well, chapter-and-verse evidence of Islam's aversion to bloodshed -- always skipping the fatal exception. Mr. Bush will say: Killing an innocent human is like killing all of humanity, and then leave it at that. My translation of the Koran says: "... whosoever kills a human being, except [as punishment] for murder or for spreading corruption in the land, it shall be like killing all humanity." Easy guess that among Mr. Bush's Ramadan guests were a few who consider Americans guilty of murder, Israelis innocent of nothing, and both, as non-Muslims, complicit in "spreading corruption in the land" -- and thus deserving death, dismemberment and banishment as outlined in Chapter 5, Verse 33.
But back to Mr. Bush's jarring gesture of inclusion, one unlikely to be reciprocated in Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia where Bibles are verboten. What does it mean? No religious book besides the Koran inspires a religious vision of world political domination -- which, of course, includes America.
Daniel Pipes, writing in Commentary magazine in 2001, reported on specific Muslim efforts to turn America into a sharia-ruled caliphate. More recently, the Middle East Media Research Institute tells us, Ahmad Dewidar, the prominent imam of the Islamic Center in New York and a lecturer at Manhattan University, referred in an interview to mosque-talk of how the White House -- "through the domination of Islam and its ideas" -- would become the "Muslim House." Mr. Bush has begun to acknowledge such designs, as when in a recent speech he mentioned jihadists' goal of "totalitarian empire." But the president is still distorting history, both recent and ancient, by denying links between jihad war and Islamic teachings, derived in large part from the Koran.
After September 11, Mr. Bush declared "Islam is peace." Now, he insists that "extremists" "distort the idea of jihad" into a rationale for terrorism. Maybe Mr. Bush will read his new Koran and discover that the idea of jihad is itself extreme. Better still, maybe Mr. Bush will go so far as to add another book to the White House collection: "The Legacy of Jihad" by Andrew G. Bostom. This extraordinary compendium of primary and secondary source material, much of it translated into English for the first time, elucidates the theory and practice of jihad over 1,400 years. With its chronological span across the centuries, "The Legacy of Jihad" goes a long way toward bridging the void in Western understanding of the institutional role of jihad within Islam.
The White House may have its own Koran now, but the president's reckoning with the legacy of jihad is still overdue.

When are people going to get the picture? Hey Dubya: THEY HATE YOU. THEY. WANT. TO. SLAUGHTER. YOUR. FAMILY.

Trying to appease Muslims has proven impossible. Because if it's not the lack of a Koran in the WK library, its the fact that America has troops in the middle east. And if American troops were not in the middle east, it would be American Infidel citizens polluting the Holy Land of the middle east. And if no Infidel American citizens were in the middle east, then it would be the Infidel American Culture in the middle east for them to bitch about. And if there was no infidel American culture in the middle east, it would be the fact that infidels deserve to die because of colonization by Europeans. And if there was no colonization by Europeans, they would bitch about the Reconquista. If there were no Reconquista, they would bitch about the Crusades. If there were no Crusades, they would bitch about an 7th century European merchant who sold Muhammed a bad peice of merchandise.

Islamists are just looking for excuses to kill infidels. Period. And unless W is planning on thwarting them by making Islam the state religon (which Liberals are seriously considering) these rote gestures are as meaningless as they are insulting to all the infidel Americans who are proud of their culture and history, and do not feel the need to bend the knee to a bunch psychopathic murderers.

And it's not just the frickn' Koran in the White House. It's everything. It's W saying "Islam means peace" when in reality is means submission. It's pistol-weilding Yasser Arafat speaking at the UN. It's Palestine getting to march under the name "Palestine" in the Olympics when no such sympathy is reserved for Taiwan. It's Islamists planning a Jihad against a Danish newspaper for drawing Mohammed. It's Theo van Gogh being murdered for making a movie. It's Muslim clerics dictating to FREE nations exactly what kind of freedoms cannot be tolerated, and free nations actually listening to them. It's the refusal to profile the ethnic/age group of 90% of terrorists for fear of being called a "racist". It's the ACLU on a crusade (pardon the pun) to remove any and all vestiges of Christianity from the land but not saying a damn thing on the GIANT MUSLIM CRESCENT being passed off as a memorial to flight 93 victims, who were, incidentally, murdered by Islamic terrorists.

/rant off

 

[Hagbard Celine]

which Liberals are seriously considering

You know, I almost agreed with you but you had to take a jab at libs didn't you? The people in the middle east causing all these problems have the same mindset as people like you here at home. They're just hateful assholes who want to hear themselves talk.

 

[sitarro]

You know, I almost agreed with you but you had to take a jab at libs didn't you? The people in the middle east causing all these problems have the same mindset as people like you here at home. They're just hateful assholes who want to hear themselves talk.

So Hag,
Do you include such stellar individuals as Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Charlie Rangels, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Bill and Hill Clinton, James Carville, Bill Maher, Mike Malloy, Paul Begala, Arianna Huffington, Al Franken, Joseph Biden, Howard Dean, Helen Thomas, Maureen Dowd, Harry Belafonte, or Molly Ivins in the "hateful assholes" category?

 

[Hagbard Celine]

So Hag,
Do you include such stellar individuals as Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Charlie Rangels, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Bill and Hill Clinton, James Carville, Bill Maher, Mike Malloy, Paul Begala, Arianna Huffington, Al Franken, Joseph Biden, Howard Dean, Helen Thomas, Maureen Dowd, Harry Belafonte, or Molly Ivins in the "hateful assholes" category?

Some of them are. I didn't say "just conservatives are capable of being assholes." Can anyone back up Theim's ridiculously bogus claim that liberals want to make Islam the national religion? I'll save you the trouble, the answer is no.