Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.The federal government alone costs us over 10 Billion a day.
Numbers without scale are meaningless.
Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
And not benefitting workers. Not really what the public was sold on....It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.Yeah...so? It doesn't matter....the trade war is ON TOP of the Fed government cost...you cannot be that dense....can you?
If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too.
No fair! Corporations spending their own money. Benefitting all the owners.
the economic cost of right wing bigotry?Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
the economic cost of right wing bigotry?Trump's Trade War Cost U.S. More Than $3 Billion A Month, Economists Say | HuffPost
Yup....the deal maker is dealing the US a bad hand...
And not benefitting workers. Not really what the public was sold on....It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.If it results in us getting better trade terms in the future it is worth it, and will pay for itself back.
I am merely pointing out the scale. How much trade do we do a month on average, and how much is $3 billion with regards to that.
Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too.
No fair! Corporations spending their own money. Benefitting all the owners.
Wages are still very stagnant especially given how low unemployment is. Dems will gladly point out the cuts went right to the wealthy.And not benefitting workers. Not really what the public was sold on....It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.Thanks for a rational response. The "If" reminds me of the "If" in the possibility of a business boom resulting from the GOP tax give away.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back....rather than business expansion.
But again....thank you for a reasonable response.
That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too.
No fair! Corporations spending their own money. Benefitting all the owners.
And not benefitting workers.
Not at all? Really?
Not really what the public was sold on....
Like, "Every family will save $2500 a year"?
Wages are still very stagnant especially given how low unemployment is. Dems will gladly point out the cuts went right to the wealthy.And not benefitting workers. Not really what the public was sold on....It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too. Doesn't leave money for increased wages though. And we have seen that.That resulted in a massive stock buy back...
Thanks for reminding me how much I hate it when my stocks go up in price.
It went up for the CEO and other top people in the company too.
No fair! Corporations spending their own money. Benefitting all the owners.
And not benefitting workers.
Not at all? Really?
Not really what the public was sold on....
Like, "Every family will save $2500 a year"?