Trump Blames Haley for January 6th

How many times are you going to defend the planned shit that went on to make sure the election was stolen? Pelosi was able to change the rules due to a created emergency ( a riot) so no challenges could be bought up when they returned to certify. That made the theft complete and a illegitimate pervert was president.

You're batshit insane, FruitLoops. There was no such "rule" and in fact, it was REPUBLICANS who voluntarily retracted their objections because of the attack on the Capitol...




prior to the actions and events of today, we did. But following the events of today, it appears that some Senators have withdrawn their objections.
 
Numbnuts Nancy doesn't control the national guard she would have the Sargent of arms make the request.

Retard, the House Sergeant-at-Arms doesn't have that authority either.

But you know who does? The Defense Secretary. Know who can order him to camm up the National Guard in D.C.? The president. So now we see it was Trump who failed.
 
Retard, the House Sergeant-at-Arms doesn't have that authority either.

But you know who does? The Defense Secretary. Know who can order him to camm up the National Guard in D.C.? The president. So now we see it was Trump who failed.
You're an ignorant bitch.
The following divisions comprise the Office of the Sergeant at Arms:

  • Immediate Office/Member Support
  • Protocol and Chamber Operations
  • House Garages & Parking Security
  • Information Services
  • Identification Services
  • Police Services/Law Enforcement
  • House Security
  • Emergency Management
Learn more about the past and present Sergeants at Arms on the History, Art & Archives website.
 
You're an ignorant bitch.
The following divisions comprise the Office of the Sergeant at Arms:

  • Immediate Office/Member Support
  • Protocol and Chamber Operations
  • House Garages & Parking Security
  • Information Services
  • Identification Services
  • Police Services/Law Enforcement
  • House Security
  • Emergency Management
Learn more about the past and present Sergeants at Arms on the History, Art & Archives website.

LOL

Nothing in there about Capitol security OR calling up the National Guard.

You bitch-slapped yourself again.

The Capitol Police Board can request the National guard. Until recently, a single member of that board could not.
 
You're batshit insane, FruitLoops. There was no such "rule" and in fact, it was REPUBLICANS who voluntarily retracted their objections because of the attack on the Capitol...




prior to the actions and events of today, we did. But following the events of today, it appears that some Senators have withdrawn their objections.

Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.


♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?


A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
 
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!


Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.


The final touch. Steal successful.
 
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.


♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?


A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!

You're lying as always, FruitLoops. I gave you video of a Republican Senator stating they had the written and signed objections but in light of the assault on the Capitol, REPUBUBLICAN Senators were withdrawing their objections. Pelosi could not create any rule to control the Senate.

But more to the point that you're batshit crazy and completely out of your mind, one state did manage to object. In the middle of the night and to the jeers of most of Congress, a senator and state rep did object to Pennsylvania, which was brought to the floor for a vote and soundly rejected.

According to you, they couldn't have done what they did because of Pelosi. :cuckoo:

 
What you posted has nothing to do with what Pelosi did. She made sure the steal went through.

Nope, you lied. You claimed Pelosi prevented any objections and I proved one state did object and others said they were going to object but changed their minds following the days' events of Trump fanatics storming the Capitol.
 
I showed you that she made sure they could not object. That is fact. You lose troll.

Retard, they did object. I showed you they had to vote on PA because it was being objected. How could there have been an objection to PA if you were sane and Pelosi had actually prevented objections?

You're out of your fucking mind, FruitLoops. :cuckoo:
 
You didn't read the last link provided. Dumbass.
The word emergency management is part of the responsibilities of the Sargeant of arms.

Of course I read it. That's how I know you didn't read it because the word "emergency" isn't in that link either.

:lmao:
 
Of course I read it. That's how I know you didn't read it because the word "emergency" isn't in that link either.

:lmao:
You didn't read the house link that gives the responsibilities of the Sargeant of Arms
The
following divisions comprise the Office of the Sergeant at Arms:

  • Immediate Office/Member Support
  • Protocol and Chamber Operations
  • House Garages & Parking Security
  • Information Services
  • Identification Services
  • Police Services/Law Enforcement
  • House Security
  • Emergency Management
Learn more about the past and present Sergeants at Arms on the History, Art & Archives website.
 
Last edited:
You didn't read the house link that gives the responsibilities of the Sargeant of Arms
The
following divisions comprise the Office of the Sergeant at Arms:

  • Immediate Office/Member Support
  • Protocol and Chamber Operations
  • House Garages & Parking Security
  • Information Services
  • Identification Services
  • Police Services/Law Enforcement
  • House Security
  • Emergency Management
Learn more about the past and present Sergeants at Arms on the History, Art & Archives website.

PussyBitch, read your own links...

Irving did not consult first with his boss, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top