This just in: Muslims are violent People...Merged With Here We Go Again

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by insein, Sep 15, 2006.

  1. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    Or they are little kids. Or maybe alittle of both. Why else would they decide to riot and burn pictures of the Leader of a religion they dont follow? Freaking animals with the mental capacity of little kids that throw temper tantrums everytime someone says something bad about them. Its only a matter of time before cars are destroyed.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...1811&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    SCREW EM' I am really tired of all this catering to PC BS! Islam is evil...get over it boys and girls! Unless ya want to join the dead!:food1:
     
  3. Kagom
    Offline

    Kagom Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,161
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Vicksburg, MS
    Ratings:
    +141
    As if Catholics have any real claim anymore.
     
  4. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Seems as if CNN et al are getting the message...even the super lib from my state..Jack Cafferty...got the message...he is now pushing the viewers comments...'Screw em' there is hope boys and girls...that is if CNN et al wakes up to reality!:teeth:
     
  5. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    Here we go again with another outburst from the Religion of Perpetual Outrage. Muslims worldwide are angry again, this time at (Can you guess who? Drum roll, please. . .) the pope!

    Muslims are angry over some remarks made by Pope Benedict XVI during a lecture at a German university. The Vatican later said that the pope did not intend the remarks to be offensive, but you know how that goes. Anyway, here are some excerpts from the speech. As a sort of amusing exercise, see if you can pick out the parts that, once again, have Muslims worldwide having conniption fits.

    I was reminded of all this recently, when I read... of part of the dialogue carried on - perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara - by the erudite Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both.

    In the seventh conversation...the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

    The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God," he says, "is not pleased by blood - and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats."


    Sounds kinda like the pope was basically saying that violent jihad might not be a particularly good thing. What could be more infuriating than that, especially coming from a pointy-headed chief infidel? As my grandmother used to say, it's enough to make an imam -- er, I mean, a preacher -- cuss.

    Reaction from various imams, clerics and other Islamic authority figures continues to pour in now. Here are a few choice comments:

    "He has a dark mentality that comes from the darkness of the Middle Ages. . . . It looks like an effort to revive the mentality of the Crusades." So said Salih Kapusuz, deputy leader of the Turkish prime minister's party.

    Sure, sure, it's the Crusades all over again. Anyone can see that.

    Or how about this from Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam: "What he had done is that he has quoted very offensive remarks by some emperor hundreds of years ago. It is not helpful (because) we have been trying to bridge the gap, calling for dialogue and understanding between religions."

    Really? I must have missed that call for dialogue and understanding in between the alleged Gitmo Koran-flushing riots and the Mohammad cartoon riots. I'll have to pay better attention from now on.

    Ms. Aslam went on to say that Muslims had a long history of tolerance, adding that when the Catholic kingdom of Spain expelled its Jewish population in 1492 they were welcomed by Muslim nations such as the Turkish Ottoman Empire.

    Well, they're not very welcome now, are they? Iran's President Ahmadgenocide -- er, excuse me, Ahmadinejad -- wants to wipe that tiny little Zionist regime off the map and the funny thing is, I haven't heard anything about the Muslim masses protesting his intolerance of Jews.

    But maybe the best comment of all came, once again, from the same silver-tongued spokeswoman: "Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence."

    Wait a minute. If Islam was actually tolerant as the good lady says, then the mere description of it as intolerant wouldn't encourage violence, would it? Doesn't her statement actually confirm the very thing she is denying, which is the intolerance of Islam?

    There I go again, trying to make logical points about something that was said by a representative of the Religion of Perpetual Outrage. Talk about an exercise in futility.

    http://www.bloggernews.net/2006/09/muslims-worldwide-angry-over-pope.html
     
  6. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I really think Insein already started this thread...could be wrong though as I did not master English 101...lol:huh:
     
  7. Eightball
    Offline

    Eightball Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,359
    Thanks Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +252
    Man alive......these folks have so many people, big and small on their "hit list" it's incredible?

    Remember old Rushdi or Rushti.....probably mispelled the authors name, who as a Muslim wrote a book that was critical of his faith...........?

    He was on the run for years..........
    .....
    Muslim Ayatolahs mantras.......follow the same old theme for anyone who doesn't agree with them..."Our way, or no way!".
    ......
    Why do we have to walk on egg shells around these folks......do they do the same for us and our religion, culture and values?

    Who was it that said something about "drawing a line in the sand"?
     
  8. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    Here's a "line" they should be able to understand, "FUCK 'EM", and the camel they road to town on.

    :gives:
     
  9. UnAmericanYOU
    Offline

    UnAmericanYOU VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +122
    And now the venerable rag of a magazine Time is blaming the Pope for the violent reaction of the Muslims Pope Benedict said were violent.

    Oh, noes, these comments might end up costing more than the Vatican's reputation! They might even call another jihad, watch it, Pope.

    The title of this article is "The first Casualty of the Pope's Islam Speech".

    The full article, unfair and unbalanced:
    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1535432,00.html?cnn=yes

    The best argument against provoking Islamic terrorists is that it's redundant.
     
  10. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,548
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,165
    The Pope has already backed down from his statements, which honestly surprises me. If you are going to make a statement i think you need to stick with it. Atleast if you are going to claim to be a moral leader for the world.

    But what I cant understand the reaction. "What?! We are violent?! How dare he! Lets threaten him!"

    i mean why on earth would people think Muslims were violent.
     

Share This Page