This is John F. Kennedy’s economy! No wait, it’s Reagan’s...No, it’s Clinton’s.

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
39,914
22,202
1,915
MEXIFORNIA
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?

What a retarded fucking argument.

You are saying that if causality believing causality involves multiple factors, one must conclude that causality can be any factor whatsoever.

Also, it is a complex question fallacy to insist that Presidents have any causal relationship to the condition of the economy.
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?

What a retarded fucking argument.

You are saying that if causality believing causality involves multiple factors, one must conclude that causality can be any factor whatsoever.

Also, it is a complex question fallacy to insist that Presidents have any causal relationship to the condition of the economy.

Well, it certainly is a complex fallacy when you loons want to attribute our current economy to Ears.
 
It could have been Obama's if he knew jack about economies and business. Too late now.

My 14 year old could have done what the Kenyan did for the economy with $10 trillion dollars from good Americans.

The Great Obama stopped a Depression

The greatest Republican minds of the day couldn’t do it
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?

What a retarded fucking argument.

You are saying that if causality believing causality involves multiple factors, one must conclude that causality can be any factor whatsoever.

Also, it is a complex question fallacy to insist that Presidents have any causal relationship to the condition of the economy.

I totally agree....stupid fucking LefTard logic isn’t it?
 
It could have been Obama's if he knew jack about economies and business. Too late now.

My 14 year old could have done what the Kenyan did for the economy with $10 trillion dollars from good Americans.

The Great Obama stopped a Depression

The greatest Republican minds of the day couldn’t do it
I have no idea why Michelle's ass is so important to you.
No idea what you are babbling about
 
We should keep not electing Democrats since they create such good economies when not innoffice.
 
Republicans maintain a fantasy that every President starts with an economic blank slate

Bush started with a surging economy
Obama started fighting off a depression
Trump started with a booming economy
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
Of course the state of the economy is the responsibility of the current president. But if he is going to take credit for positive change then the %change needs to be reviewed and compared to past administrations. Wouldn’t you agree?
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
That’s funny coming from the right.... who credited Reagan with the economy until 2000.
 
Republicans maintain a fantasy that every President starts with an economic blank slate

Bush started with a surging economy
Obama started fighting off a depression
Trump started with a booming economy
That’s seems to be typical of Donald “born on third base and bragging about a homerun” Trump.
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
Of course the state of the economy is the responsibility of the current president. But if he is going to take credit for positive change then the %change needs to be reviewed and compared to past administrations. Wouldn’t you agree?

Oh Slade.. you are the hands down king of semantics and hair splitting...haha. You’re actually quite facinating.
How far back should we go in these totally useful comparisons...you’re making the rules....right?
Should we compare Donny’s economic growth percentage to Lincoln’s?
Wouldn’t any POTUS taking office post recession look good on any spreadsheet? Nowhere to go but up...right?
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
Of course the state of the economy is the responsibility of the current president. But if he is going to take credit for positive change then the %change needs to be reviewed and compared to past administrations. Wouldn’t you agree?

Oh Slade.. you are the hands down king of semantics and hair splitting...haha. You’re actually quite facinating.
How far back should we go in these totally useful comparisons...you’re making the rules....right?
Should we compare Donny’s economic growth percentage to Lincoln’s?
Wouldn’t any POTUS taking office post recession look good on any spreadsheet? Nowhere to go but up...right?
Let’s just go back to Obama shall we?
 
If the state of the current economy doesn’t lie with the sitting POTUS couldn’t one make the retarded argument that all things happening were destined to happen based on happenings from decades or even centuries ago?
Sounds LibTardish as hell doesn’t it?
tough to hit an emoji on this one. If I hit agree, is it I agree it's stupid libtardish or I agree one could look back and say it's Reagan's economy. Since this is all serially progressive, than I really can't argue this isn't Reagan's economy.
 
Republicans maintain a fantasy that every President starts with an economic blank slate

Bush started with a surging economy
Obama started fighting off a depression
Trump started with a booming economy
Bush started with a reccession.
Well, except for the fact that the economy wasn’t in recession when Bush became president, sure.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top