things I don't understand

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by pinqy, May 23, 2010.

  1. pinqy
    Online

    pinqy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,044
    Thanks Received:
    574
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,009
    Assuming that 9/11 was an inside job, why do it that way?

    Assuming:
    • Planes hit the WTC, but it was controlled demolitions that brought the towers down.
    • No plane hit the Pentagon, but really a missle.
    • No plane crashed in Shanksville, the hole was faked.
    Why would that plan make sense? Why have planes AND controlled demolition? While planes alone might not have been as destructive (under our assumptions) why wouldn't the planes alone have been sufficient to blame a terrorist attack?
    Why shoot a missle at the Pentagon and claim it was a plane? Why not use a plane, or claim the missle was a terrorist missle? Why bother with Shanksville at all if there was no plane, or why not actually crash a plane? What sense does it make to claim a failed attack like that?

    Now, my prediction is that some people will not actually answer these questions or even try to explain, but simply post video links (which I can't access) and/or otherwise repeat the same things pointing out alleged flaws in the official story.

    So....forget whatever flaws there may be in the official story, just deal with the issue I'm talking about.
     
  2. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    twoofers dont care about facts, making sense or evidence. they already have come to the conclusion that america attacked america and will only show evidence that supports their preconceived conclusion.... no matter how absurd.
     
  3. SFC Ollie
    Offline

    SFC Ollie Still Marching

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    28,742
    Thanks Received:
    4,418
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Extreme East Ohio
    Ratings:
    +4,457
    But Fizz, they have no evidence. Not once has anyone offered proof that the 911 CR is wrong.

    We hear or see a lot of BS theories with some really screwed up statements, But there is not an ounce of physical proof that the 911CR is wrong.

    So pinqy, keeping this in mind.................................... no one would do it that way.
     
  4. Activist Too
    Offline

    Activist Too GFS

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    28
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    West Coast
    Ratings:
    +4
    I decided that I'd best focus myself on things I might be able to do something about, or help do something about rather than argue about that which I cannot directly affect or prove. I see a lot of this stuff as being used as a red herring (ala debate) to try to distract the public from the things the powers that be do not want them to notice or take action about. Really. We must be clear headed at all times!
     
  5. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054

    I see a lot of this stuff as being used as a red herring (ala debate) to try to distract the public from the things the powers that be do not want them to notice or take action about.


    Activis Too, is a power that be? :eek:
     
  6. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    You are asking people to make 'sense' in their arguments and that is not going to happen.
     
  7. gslack
    Offline

    gslack Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,527
    Thanks Received:
    346
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +346
    Simple answer? They wouldn't have bothered... Wouldn't have had to. IF they (CIA,NSA,name your agency or whatever) wanted to frighten people into this or that, they wouldn't do so in such a manner. All they would have to do is place the idea in the right head of the right people, relax some security and procedures long enough and play dumb and they would do it for them...

    Or even better, they wouldn't even have to do that at all. They could show some pictures of tormented children and or women being mistreated, and we would demand intervention on their behalf...

    Thats the reality here.. They try and pretend it was a scare tactic to get us into a war on terror or for ural mountains gas reserves or whatever. But the truth is something like WTC would have been overkill in the extreme.

    Sure there are a lot of unanswered questions, and the 911 commission report was just like the warren report for the JFK assassination. it is not meant to give answers or investigate truth. Its to tell us what they are accepting and going to commit to... In every single one of those commissions the who, what, and where are already set. All they do is give the impression they are doing something and giving the public something to quiet them...

    Those questions will never be answered because those commissions do not have any intention of investigation.

    How did they come down? They were hit by planes knocking out enough of their steel space frame endo-skeleton to allow the stress of the structures weight and the wind at those heights to do the rest.

    Who did it? Evil bastards who for some reason wanted to... Whatever the reasons, or whoever they were; be they terrorists, mossad, CIA, Wealthy internationalists pent on world domination, take your pick it changes nothing...

    Why? Well you name it... Seriously, I have seen everything from terrorizing the public to an insurance scam and all points between. This does not change anything either.. We can't take it back, and how could we possibly punish those responsible enough? What would be a fitting punishment? Nothing I can think of would quite cut it, and the only alternative would force us to become the type of people we oppose....

    My point in all this simple... We will never in our lifetimes know all the particulars, this is too big and too damning for everyone who could possibly be involved. Something like this requires mutually assured destruction of all parties involved. if you could even get one person who was involved, that person would be already vilified beyond any hope of believability or trust. if he or she even made it to that point. And then the lead would be cut off there. Its a hydra, where you cut off one head and another one or two takes its place. All heads assuring the protection and silence of the others....
     
  8. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    A few of my favorite things I don't understand:

    Why do dogs bite?

    Why do bees sting?

    Why am I feeling sad?
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2010
  9. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    You're not really feeling sad. You're living IT. :eusa_angel:
     
  10. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    Dante, you infer no sense.
     

Share This Page