There is a consensus...but it's not for AGW

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Jul 20, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,972
    Thanks Received:
    7,975
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,721
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,217
    Thanks Received:
    2,913
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,221
    w0w West.........how compelling is that??? West again with the direct eye poke to the k0o0ks..............

    and from that article.....................

    Before quickly commenting on the cause, take a look at the effect. USA Today titles a June 22 article Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real. Excerpts:

    The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is “very likely” caused mainly by human activity.

    The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is “very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth’s average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century.”

    …..

    As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

    The study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences provided a hit-list of scientists whom the authors claim should not be believed on the subject of global warming. Holy politically motivated blacklist!!!! This is exactly the complaint made by credible scientists about the bias in scientific publications on climate; one of the elements of the scam highlighted by Climategate emails. Warming propagandists make systematic efforts to shut other scientists out to keep their fraudulent work from being exposed.

    The authors hand picked the 1,372 scientists in their review, a small portion of the 10s of thousands of scientists who have weighed in on the subject, and made up their own criteria for determining agreement with the IPCC and for determining who’s credible and who’s not. If the public pays much attention to this paper – I personally guarantee you’ll be hearing more about the bias, misrepresentations, and misleading illogic that this paper has to offer.

    Meanwhile, the IPCC is in critical condition. Warmers are trying to save it, and start up the eternal do-overs to bring it some credibility in the eyes of the non-scientific public – or at least give cover to continuing political efforts on Cap-n-Trade and government takeovers through PR tricks like reorganization and instruction manuals for good conduct. Why isn’t there a law demanding that these people let the dead horse rest in peace?





    Its all a gigantic scam...........but I must say, those who perpetuate this hoax are brilliant as far as duping the public. So many Mr adn Mrs Stupids out there................just buy things on face value and never consider the real substance of the shit............
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,217
    Thanks Received:
    2,913
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,221
    Awesome find West................
     
  4. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,217
    Thanks Received:
    2,913
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,221
    All you global warming true believers are so fcukking pathetic.........you were the same people who spent your early years jumping on every fcukking popular bandwagon you could hop aboard. You were last picked on the schoolyard team as a kid and were told to go walk in the woods during the games of spin the bottle as an adolescent. Highly likely you carrreid one of those gay lunch boxes to school too compliments of Mom...........The Prettyest Pony!!!! And you repeatedly got your asses kicked!!!! So............of fcukking course you were going to spend life taking the follow the leader save the world route because you arrived in adulthood having accomplished nothing except being publically humiliated on a consistent basis. Thats why these same people are also ALL fcukking limpwristers..........to them, no war is a good war. They need depserately to be represented by a cause............you see, it provides somethng meaningful in an otherwise dreadful existence. Its the proud oddball syndrome!!!
     
  5. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,564
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,673
    Who's jumping on the bandwagon? Most of the people who discount AGW don't do so because of the science, but because they dislike Al Gore. Hardly a logical reason!!! As a matter of fact it's just part of the right wing kookiness we see so much of these days running from Beck and Limbaugh to the Tea Party.
     
  6. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,972
    Thanks Received:
    7,975
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,721




    konrad,

    This makes zero sense. Scientists don't like AGW theory because it is wrong. Myself and many others have shown you repeatedly where the AGW proponents have cherry picked data and manufactured it wholesale. THAT is the reason why scientists don't like your theory my friend. Because it is wrong.
     
  7. KissMy
    Offline

    KissMy Free Breast Exam

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    12,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +2,923
    :lol: (AGW) = Anthropogenic Global Warming NOT Al Gore Warming. :cuckoo:
     
  8. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
    From the lie in the title to all the following lies, this is precisely what one would expect of our faux geologist.

    And still the fact remains, in spite of all the lying blogs claiming otherwise, all the scientific societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities state that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger.

    Now Walleyes, do you want me to once more post all the position papers from the various Geological societies from around the world concerning AGW?
     
  9. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,972
    Thanks Received:
    7,975
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,721


    Don't tell these guys:lol::lol::lol:


    US Government Halts Funds For Climate Unit

    And the postion papers are promulgated by the politically motivated leaders of the organisations (and who not coincidentally derive most of their grants from that support, duh!) not the rank and file membership who for the most part DO NOT agree with AGW.
     
  10. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    47,643
    Thanks Received:
    11,827
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +23,992

Share This Page