Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #21
Good luck with that and when it does not work out for you then understand thosecim Congress do not care what you think...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
There are two HUGE reasons Gorsuch needs to hit the road
- Thread starter JohnnyApplesack
- Start date
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 76,858
- 53,005
- 2,645
To think it was democrats expecting a hillary victory that was concerned that Trump would not accept the results of the election.
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #23
Gorsuch is a corporate lackey, which is why he ended up on Trump's list of 20
there it is
time to block this sell-out and wait until Trump's impending impeachement
there it is
time to block this sell-out and wait until Trump's impending impeachement
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,243
- 2,290
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #25
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,243
- 2,290
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
No...putin would have simply told hilary who he wanted on the Court...since he gave her 145 million dollars through the clinton foundation while she was the Secretary of State and also gave bill clinton, the rapist, 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia........
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #27
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
No...putin would have simply told hilary who he wanted on the Court...since he gave her 145 million dollars through the clinton foundation while she was the Secretary of State and also gave bill clinton, the rapist, 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia........
Sure scooter, you bet
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,781
- 43,053
- 2,605
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?
Would you understand it if he did?care to translate your translation into English?
I did
FJO
Gold Member
The butt hurt of knowing the Supreme Court will be upholding the Constitution for the next 3 decades after Trump seats three Justices has got to leave a scar.1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Don't be too sure. Republican appointed John Roberts screwed Americans with his Democrat-flavored misguided decision that gave America Obamacare.
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #30
1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?Would you understand it if he did?care to translate your translation into English?
I did
you speak righwingese, I don't
there ya go
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #31
The butt hurt of knowing the Supreme Court will be upholding the Constitution for the next 3 decades after Trump seats three Justices has got to leave a scar.1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Don't be too sure. Republican appointed John Roberts screwed Americans with his Democrat-flavored misguided decision that gave America Obamacare.
Roberts made a good call
Obamacare approval is above 50%, google it
Trumpcare DOA, definitely
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,781
- 43,053
- 2,605
it was plain English...1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?Would you understand it if he did?care to translate your translation into English?
I did
you speak righwingese, I don't
there ya go
Something you apparently have a problem with
FJO
Gold Member
actually the Merrick Garland issue is enough for the Dems to wait until those on the Trump campaign are charged or cleared of these felony charges
felons don't get to make SCOTUS picks, or at least not so far
Provide the quote from Comey that anyone from the Trump campaign is under criminal investigation you scumbag lying faggot.
Make your statement. Stop there.
NO NEED TO FINISH ALL YOUR POSTS WITH A VULGAR INSULT.
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #34
it was plain English...1. Merrick Garland
2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way
...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?
isn't it the same basic process?
Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
sorry, not a big faux and friends fan
enjoy your fantasy, why not?
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?Would you understand it if he did?care to translate your translation into English?
I did
you speak righwingese, I don't
there ya go
Something you apparently have a problem with
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,781
- 43,053
- 2,605
it was plain English...Oh...I thought you were going to actually state 2 reasons.
Allow me to translate your post....
Begin Translation:
1) He is someone who respects the Constitution and the law.
2) We don't want to let a Republican pick Supreme Court Justices.
End Translation......
sorry, not a big faux and friends fan
enjoy your fantasy, why not?
huh? what is all that?
care to translate your translation into English?Would you understand it if he did?care to translate your translation into English?
I did
you speak righwingese, I don't
there ya go
Something you apparently have a problem with
Speak up, I can't see what you're saying
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
How Biden killed John Roberts’s nomination in 1992
That's dumb.
1. Is it a bad thing, a good thing, or bad when Republicans do it but good when democrats do it?
2. Until convicted, the POTUS is still POTUS. Bubba Clinton continued functioning while he was on trial and when he was impeached.
When did the Dems refuse to give a repub SCOTUS nomination any consideration whatsoever?
Fox 'news' can't help ya with this one tiger
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
Show me a felony conviction.
actually the Merrick Garland issue is enough for the Dems to wait until those on the Trump campaign are charged or cleared of these felony charges
felons don't get to make SCOTUS picks, or at least not so far
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 79
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 445
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 99
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 336
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 17
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 371
- Replies
- 79K
- Views
- 1M
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 148
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8069
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-