heretic
An Individual
- Jun 10, 2007
- 30
- 2
- 1
I think things are changing DEPITE the best efforts of the insider party to keep a lid on things, personally.
like what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think things are changing DEPITE the best efforts of the insider party to keep a lid on things, personally.
like what?
Yes. I'm talking about 2010.
Obama is a very weak politician. He's the most inexperience politicians in more than a hundred years to run for President. Furthermore, he flip-flops on major issues to get votes. He should be easily manipulated if he wins.
The Clinton machine, as you call it, only works if there is a spoiler candidate like Ross Perot.
bullshit.
A weak politician? Really? He is somehow the "most inexperienced politician to run in more than a hundred years", but is going to win anyway, and that makes him weak? That makes him damned skilled at what he does.
So who exactly was the spoiler candidate in 1996 when Clinton won with 49.24% of the vote?
does anyone really think anything will change? do you really? i dont. i see it as just smoke and mirrors the two party system and all..nothing changes...only the names to protect the GUILTY.
Obama is at the right place at the right time, just like he was when he ran for Senator. GWB has made a mess of things and the economy is suffering. Frankly, I'm surprised the election has been so close. However, I fully expect a one-sided victory for Obama. Maybe he truly is the Messiah:
The spoiler candidate in 1996 was - Ross Perot! Of course, you knew that, but for some reason you think that Bill Clinton won it all on his own. He didn't even get 50% of the vote.