Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
That isn't my assumption.You are assuming the universe can gain speed on its own after slowing down.
The Cosmological Constant
Dark energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
...like a positive cosmological constant/dark energy...
False.
Heat death of the universe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Such high theoretical calculations ofare a real limit to the plausibility of a non-zero cosmological constant. The above was only an example for a single field, and it is possible that the the contributions of all the different fields associated with the particles of the standard model conspire to produce a cosmological constant that is small. This argument, however, leads to the belief that the cosmological constant is exactly zero, for how could the fields conspire to cancel out all but 1 part in 10^120?
Do you think I'm retarded?
The conclusion you chose to omit:
Even though theoretical calculations of the cosmological constant are not fully understood, the fact remains that the vacuum energy does exist. Since gravity couples all forms of energy, the cosmological constant remains as a physically plausible part of modern cosmology.
No, I think you are dishonest.
Physically plausible BUT with a value of ZERO, not the POSITIVE value you need.
A "cosmological constant with a value of zero" is not a cosmological constant, dude. My position is generally accepted and is in agreement with empirical data. Yours is rooted in speculation, makes unfounded assumptions, and contradicts observed evidence and recorded data.
See "conclusion":
Cosmological Constant