Mr.Nick
VIP Member
- May 10, 2011
- 9,604
- 719
- 83
actually paul has made it clear, along with his fellow idiots, that he doesn't believe there is *anything* worth fighting and dying for.
and thinking if you're nice to terrorists, they'll go away is imbecilic. you think spain did anything to warrant its subway system being bombed?
i really dislike you for making me agree with gay trauma... well kind of.
Do you think Ron Paul would just sit there watching our enemies attack our foreign assets?
Do you think he will say: "yeah I have no problem with murdering 200,000 Iranian civilians if Iranian Sharia Islamic militants attempt to destroy Israel?"
That would be a libertarian approach to global issues.
i think he's an isolationist who would do absolutely nothing to help israel. he would say it isn't "our problem"... same as people made the holocaust a "jewish problem" and we didn't get into WW2 until after pearl harbor despite the carnage.
so yeah, i think he's pretty useless on that particular issue. not that i think it was any better to get into a war of choice based on pathetic lies in iraq.
why would you call them "terrorists" if its their GOVERNMENT who wants to destroy israel? just wondering. because this is the only issue i disagree with him on... it's just one among many that illustrate his naivete and ignorance.
I used to believe Ron Paul was an isolationist..
Libertarians aren't isolationists we're individualists who are opposed to cannon fodder - why send 3,000 kids off to die when you can drop 3,000 bombs?
There is no need to get involved in others business if you don't have to because they know you're crazy enough to blow their brains out.