Wacky Quacky
Gold Member
- May 16, 2011
- 2,103
- 377
- 130
I'm not hypnotized there are HUGE core differences in the ideologies
Differences in ideology, sure. But differences in actions and policies, slim to none.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not hypnotized there are HUGE core differences in the ideologies
These aren't examples of The Obama running against the relevant Bush policies/actions and then changing those policies/actions after He took office.Take your pick.Please provide specific examples.
I -do- find it funny that this is all y'all can come up with.
Its despicable to give Obama credit for the CIA and military guys under cover and on the front lines.The Obama ran against the policies and actions of the Bush Administration.
His message of Hope and Change was predicated on the promise that He would bring "Hope" to the country by Changing those actions and policies - that he would deliver us from the ideological evil that was GWB.
Questions:
-Which of the specified GWB policies/actions has The Obama changed?
-How did He change it?
-How has that change brought the improvements He promised?
Please be sepcific in your responses, and be sure to show causation.
He put some teeth behind President Bushes 9-11 rhetoric. In that we would go after the perps of 9-11 no matter where they were hiding. Evidenced by his willingness to attack the Pastun area of Pakistan (although Bush didn't really have the advanced drones Obama has, he was hand off the tribal area) as well as authorizing the attack deep inside Pakistan to kill OBL.
President Obama has proven to be a politician capable of most any lie. I'm still glad he is president and not McCain.
Ideologies? What ideologies? Both parties are totally occupied with getting power and keeping it. Where is the difference? Didn't the Democrats vote with the Republicans for the illegal invasion of Iraq against the wishes of the majority? Where are these profound differences?
When I lived in Maine long ago, we had two excellent Senators, Cohen and Mitchell. They worked well together and even wrote a book together. They served in subsequent administrations. One was a Democrat, one a Republican. There was no ideological problem between them.
The problem is not honorable men such as they. The problem is the political hacks that dominate both parties.
It is past time for a change.
"The Obama has continued, if not expanded almost all of the GWB policies/actions He ran against.
If GWB was a disaster, what's that make The Obama?"
The same thing light.
Except when he did.These aren't examples of The Obama running against the relevant Bush policies/actions and then changing those policies/actions after He took office.Take your pick.
I -do- find it funny that this is all y'all can come up with.
President Bush was not going to attack inside Pakistan.
Looks like you'll have to find a valid exanple.He did exactly what he said he would do.