The New Cult Of LGBT Packaging Of Child Sexual Mutilation: "Regular People Just Don't Care"

Silhouette

Gold Member
Jul 15, 2013
25,815
1,938
265
I have noticed a disturbing trend since the cult of LGBT lost the election for the democrats. Because undoubtedly the discussions behind closed doors turned to Obama's Executive Order to allow sexually deranged boys in girls bathrooms in schools across the country. That was, as they say, the proverbial straw that busted the working class voters' value vote this year. And ouch, what a mistake.

Deciding, obviously and evidently, to not scrape off this cult and its value system, the new packaging of the extremely controversial subject of drugging children to get "sex change" procedures has taken a new twist. The idea is to ultimately amputate their healthy organs after the MDs make them sign a waiver saying "you know this won't really make you the opposite gender"....

But how to get the public behind this Machiavellian practice with all those pesky child welfare protection laws on the Federal and states' books? Sell it to the public. Wrapped in a new "who gives a fuck?" package.

The argument goes something like this: "Look, what people do with their bodies is THEIR business. Who care if this or that person (read: child, but not stated out loud) decides they want to try a sex change? It's not hurting me!"

Or, stated more simply the new sell could be called "Silent assent of child abuse by refusing to care." The only problem with that is, that there are laws on the books federally and in most if not all states that say if you even suspect child abuse is going on, it is a violation of law to not report it or do something about it. So will they next lobby Congress to relax child protection laws if enough people "just don't care one way or the other"? Have we gone so far down the perversity-cult rabbit hole that we don't even care to protect children anymore?

Stand up and fight them. Fight them with all you have. Do NOT be lulled to sleep or brow beaten for CARING ABOUT CHILDREN! Fer crissakes.

https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/manda.pdf#page=2&view=Reporting by other persons
Approximately 48 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands designate professions whose members are mandated by law to report child maltreatment. The word “ approximately” is used to stress the fact that States frequently amend their laws. This information is current only through August 2015. At that time, New Jersey and Wyoming were the only two States that did not enumerate specific professional groups as mandated reporters but required all persons to report....Social workers Teachers, principals, and other school personnel Physicians, nurses, and other health-care workers..Counselors, therapists, and other mental health professionals Child care providers Medical examiners or coroners Law enforcement officer

Reporting by Other Persons In approximately 18 States and Puerto Rico, any person who suspects child abuse or neglect is required to report. Of these 18 States, 16 States and Puerto Rico specify certain professionals who must report, but also require all persons to report suspected abuse or neglect, regardless of profession. Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah.

Now, is it child abuse or not to drug a minor teen with the intention of eventually having that drugging leading them to seek to have their genitals amputated? Is that coercion of child mental illness or not? If you believe it is, you are REQUIRED BY LAW to do something about it. If you live in one of the states mentioned above and you do not actively try to interfere or stop your neighbor having their child drugged to get a sex change eventually, you can be criminally prosecuted for failing to protect that child from its parents and its (malpracticing) "doctors". Doctors are not exempt from introspection of practices that endanger children. If you know of doctors doing these procedures in these states, INSIST ON CITIZEN PROSECUTION of them. Hound your district attorneys into next year and force them to act to protect children.
 
Last edited:
The New Cult Of LGBT Packaging Of Child Sexual Mutilation: "Regular People Just Don't Care"

yet parents allow circumcisions of baby boys without their consent, to a religious mutation of a sex organ..
 
^^ Circumcision hasn't been found by the WHO to cause cancer Moonglow. It also doesn't leave a child incontinent, sexually numb and under the delusion that he somehow is the opposite gender. Circumcision was performed often as a matter of cleanliness. I myself don't believe in it that way, but you could imagine more harmful things being able to live under that fold of skin: VD speaking.

Gather together with your neighbors and sign a petition asking your local prosecutors to investigate any doctor prescribing hormone-change therapy to a minor. The World Health Organization has listed those hormones as class 1 carcinogens. This is unnecessary child endangerment. In order to present a defense in court, the MD in question would have to prove to jurors that a cancer-causing regime was necessary. In other words he'd have to prove to defend that a change of gender was actually possible.

Very difficult to do when you make your patients sign a waiver that says "you know this surgery won't actually change your gender". :deal:

In fact, you are required to seek to have ANY person of ANY status or title prosecuted if you suspect their handling of a minor child is causing them real proximate harm in any way whatsoever. I'd say encouraging a child to get cancer qualifies. Or encouraging a child to cut himself or amputate healthy organs also qualifies. Try it before jurors. Try the SHIT out of it before a jury. See where that gets the LGBT cult. Call the cards on the table. Yep. That's what needs to be done.
 
The New Cult Of LGBT Packaging Of Child Sexual Mutilation: "Regular People Just Don't Care"

yet parents allow circumcisions of baby boys without their consent, to a religious mutation of a sex organ..
Pervert
 
From attacking people for being sexually different from the "norm" to attack circumcision for religious or health reason when all have existed throughout history

Some people really are filled with ignorance and hate

good grief

Christians, you might as well throw out your bibles and stop pretending to have a moral bone in your body.

You are the ones that belong in that hell you want to condemn other to. Oh, right you have to live in a world with diversity and unique people who are not exactly like you. You are already in your own hell of your making.

:)
 
From attacking people for being sexually different from the "norm" to attack circumcision for religious or health reason when all have existed throughout history

Some people really are filled with ignorance and hate

Drugging kids with cancer-causing hormones to soften them mentally for surgical amputation of healthy organs while they have to sign a waiver that says "you know this won't actually change your gender" is not even in the same remote ballpark as people who circumcise their boys to hopefully reduce their chances of harboring venereal disease.
 
From attacking people for being sexually different from the "norm" to attack circumcision for religious or health reason when all have existed throughout history

Some people really are filled with ignorance and hate

Drugging kids with cancer-causing hormones to soften them mentally for surgical amputation of healthy organs while they have to sign a waiver that says "you know this won't actually change your gender" is not even in the same remote ballpark as people who circumcise their boys to hopefully reduce their chances of harboring venereal disease.


Under a child's desire, doctor's care with parent's permission, unless the child of age, and not at least till puberty. Most of the hormones are reversible if there is a change in the transgender's certainty of identity. Though change of mind is more likely fear of not being accepted and like to result in self abuse and suicide because they can't be themselves, who they feel they really are.
GRS will not happen till they are adults

Time to let the individual and doctors decide what is really best for that person and the public stay out of making medical and mental judgement of people they don't actually know.

If you don't like what others do for themselves and their well being with a doctor's care, don't look or ignore.

It is not your business
 
From attacking people for being sexually different from the "norm" to attack circumcision for religious or health reason when all have existed throughout history

Some people really are filled with ignorance and hate

Drugging kids with cancer-causing hormones to soften them mentally for surgical amputation of healthy organs while they have to sign a waiver that says "you know this won't actually change your gender" is not even in the same remote ballpark as people who circumcise their boys to hopefully reduce their chances of harboring venereal disease.


Under a child's desire, doctor's care with parent's permission, unless the child of age, and not at least till puberty. Most of the hormones are reversible if there is a change in the transgender's certainty of identity...

It is not your business

Sorry. It IS my business. Furthermore I'm required by law, federal and state to report anyone drugging a child with known carcinogens and exacerbating his or her mental illness by participating in his or her delusions to the point of putting the child at risk for cancer, or worse, coercing the child once at a tender age of 18 to hack his or her genitals off in a surgery where they are warned in writing "this won't actually change your gender".

Required by law to report such things and to pursue them until the guilty adults, (parents, doctors, therapists...doesn't matter who...no one is immune to the law) are prosecuted by a jury of their peers. If you believe the actions are defensible then a jury review of THE FACTS regarding these practices shouldn't rattle you at all. In either case, it not only is my business, but also the business of anyone reading these reports. Especially if they live in a state for mandatory reporting of not just professionals, but also regular people. See OP for details.

What you said essentially is "if you hear a child screaming as his parents next door bash him up against the wall, as long as the parents have signed off on this behavior, "it's none of your business". Children are not legally capable of choosing to harm themselves. So we turn to parental consent. Parental consent does not extend to the abuse of children either without or with the child's consent.
 
Last edited:
From attacking people for being sexually different from the "norm" to attack circumcision for religious or health reason when all have existed throughout history

Some people really are filled with ignorance and hate

Drugging kids with cancer-causing hormones to soften them mentally for surgical amputation of healthy organs while they have to sign a waiver that says "you know this won't actually change your gender" is not even in the same remote ballpark as people who circumcise their boys to hopefully reduce their chances of harboring venereal disease.


Under a child's desire, doctor's care with parent's permission, unless the child of age, and not at least till puberty. Most of the hormones are reversible if there is a change in the transgender's certainty of identity...

It is not your business

Sorry. It IS my business. Furthermore I'm required by law, federal and state to report anyone drugging a child with known carcinogens and exacerbating his or her mental illness by participating in his or her delusions to the point of putting the child at risk for cancer, or worse, coercing the child once at a tender age of 18 to hack his or her genitals off in a surgery where they are warned in writing "this won't actually change your gender".

Required by law to report such things and to pursue them until the guilty adults, (parents, doctors, therapists...doesn't matter who...no one is immune to the law) are prosecuted by a jury of their peers. If you believe the actions are defensible then a jury review of THE FACTS regarding these practices shouldn't rattle you at all. In either case, it not only is my business, but also the business of anyone reading these reports. Especially if they live in a state for mandatory reporting of not just professionals, but also regular people. See OP for details.

What you said essentially is "if you hear a child screaming as his parents next door bash him up against the wall, as long as the parents have signed off on this behavior, "it's none of your business". Children are not legally capable of choosing to harm themselves. So we turn to parental consent. Parental consent does not extend to the abuse of children either without or with the child's consent.


All medicines while under a doctor's care with approved treatment????

This not about the hormones or everything that goes into a child down the bottled water they drink and food they eat would be questioned and deems potentially carcinogenic in sufficient does at some time in their life..........maybe.
Sweeteners, food coloring, preservatives, hormones in the foods, even the pans they are prepared in and the way they are cooked.

What is there left to keep children or humans alive if everything is dangerous in some way, even mother's milk?

These are hormones for a treatment given by a doctor for a conditions you choose not to try and understand or accept.......probably for reasons to do with faith or bigotry, just a guess

If they are the experts and the testing and psychology has already been done over the years before even beginning hormones, why do you still question and find a need to "report" on the treatment?

How many transgenders have you known, care for, treated or studied personally? A few dozen? A few hundred? For how long?

Or you just "know"

Is your name GOD?

On what day will they get cancer and what type? Will they die or be treated?
When would they die without the treatment and how? Suicide because they are not accepted and bullied or abused in other ways? What was the quality of that life without treatment? Did they ever have any regrets?

Please enlighten us with your omnipotent clairvoyance?

Will they ever thank you or pray to you for keeping them from be who they are?

Why did you make them or any one transgender in the first place and why did it take so long for you to decide they should not be who they feel and believe and know they are? Why would you torture anyone like that in the first place? To get your kicks?

Why would you make anything carcinogenic in the first place, in any amount?
 
If they are the experts and the testing and psychology has already been done over the years before even beginning hormones, why do you still question and find a need to "report" on the treatment?...How many transgenders have you known, care for, treated or studied personally? A few dozen? A few hundred? For how long?.....Or you just "know"...Is your name GOD?....On what day will they get cancer and what type? Will they die or be treated?
When would they die without the treatment and how? Suicide because they are not accepted and bullied or abused in other ways?
What was the quality of that life without treatment? Did they ever have any regrets?

One doesn't have to be a god to have the ability to interpret sanity or the lack thereof when its lack is so very very evident. We don't help people amputate vital healthy organs EVER in medicine. Much less with a waiver that says "you know doing this won't change a thing about your gender". Why do MDs make patients sign those waivers before surgery (& before hormone treatments that are known to predispose children to cancer)? Because the MDs themselves know they are attempting to treat a deep seated mental illness with the wrong tools.

Don't need to be a god to figure that out. But you know who can figure that out? A jury.
 
If they are the experts and the testing and psychology has already been done over the years before even beginning hormones, why do you still question and find a need to "report" on the treatment?...How many transgenders have you known, care for, treated or studied personally? A few dozen? A few hundred? For how long?.....Or you just "know"...Is your name GOD?....On what day will they get cancer and what type? Will they die or be treated?
When would they die without the treatment and how? Suicide because they are not accepted and bullied or abused in other ways?
What was the quality of that life without treatment? Did they ever have any regrets?

One doesn't have to be a god to have the ability to interpret sanity or the lack thereof when its lack is so very very evident. We don't help people amputate vital healthy organs EVER in medicine. Much less with a waiver that says "you know doing this won't change a thing about your gender". Why do MDs make patients sign those waivers before surgery (& before hormone treatments that are known to predispose children to cancer)? Because the MDs themselves know they are attempting to treat a deep seated mental illness with the wrong tools.

Don't need to be a god to figure that out. But you know who can figure that out? A jury.


>>We don't help people amputate vital healthy organs EVER in medicine.<<

organ transplants
liver, kidneys, parts of lungs, artorias, skin, bone marrow
 
>>We don't help people amputate vital healthy organs EVER in medicine.<<

organ transplants
liver, kidneys, parts of lungs, artorias, skin, bone marrow
To save lives. And to accomplish something. When we take a kidney from a healthy person trying to save a loved one or a friend we don't make them sign a waiver that says "you know this will never actually change your friend's health"...

Like I said...if you're so cock-sure your position is defensible; you know, drugging kids with carcinogens & softening their minds to help them mutilate healthy organs with a waiver that says "you know this won't change your gender actually", then you'd be perfectly happy to put this issue to bed once and for all by running THE FACTS by a jury, right?

People need to report any MD who is doing these things to children; as they are required to do by child-protective laws, and let a jury decide what's what after hearing the evidence from both sides. Fair enough? Or is there some reason you'd resist that?
 
>>We don't help people amputate vital healthy organs EVER in medicine.<<

organ transplants
liver, kidneys, parts of lungs, artorias, skin, bone marrow
To save lives. And to accomplish something. When we take a kidney from a healthy person trying to save a loved one or a friend we don't make them sign a waiver that says "you know this will never actually change your friend's health"...

Like I said...if you're so cock-sure your position is defensible; you know, drugging kids with carcinogens & softening their minds to help them mutilate healthy organs with a waiver that says "you know this won't change your gender actually", then you'd be perfectly happy to put this issue to bed once and for all by running THE FACTS by a jury, right?

People need to report any MD who is doing these things to children; as they are required to do by child-protective laws, and let a jury decide what's what after hearing the evidence from both sides. Fair enough? Or is there some reason you'd resist that?


If we can remove and organ or create one to save a transgender's life how is that so different? It is what they want.

What if someone loose part or all of a penis and is given a transplant?

What about giving some a face or a leg or an eye?

We use surgery to change our looks and remove deformities that don't pose a direct threat to our lives. Why is hormones or GDS so different?

If someone "knows" they are are in the wrong body (sex) and it is for their wellbeing to change it, why is that wrong?

How does this affect you?
 
You don't save a "transgender" (mentally ill) person's life by abetting them in their disease. Your prescription for their "cure" is like an MD prescribing emetics to a bulimic to "help them transition fully in their eating orientation".

A jury. We'll run the facts by a jury. Which shouldn't bother you at all if you feel your stance is sane with regards to children.
 
You don't save a "transgender" (mentally ill) person's life by abetting them in their disease. Your prescription for their "cure" is like an MD prescribing emetics to a bulimic to "help them transition fully in their eating orientation".

A jury. We'll run the facts by a jury. Which shouldn't bother you at all if you feel your stance is sane with regards to children.

Penectomy are done by choice not just for medical reasons.

I've know people who were castrated by war or accident or chosen to have the testicles removed, which is a quick minimal surgery. Some opt for "hormones" while others did not or they were not available at the time and not going to change now.

If it is not your penis, why do you care?

There are cultures where it is normal, but then FGM is/was also considered normal in a few parts of the world as well.
Within their countries I disapprove, outside their country I have advocated against it. I understand why they do it, but don't approve. In those cases they were young girls and they were being forced down against their will. If it was a free choice, I would not feel as strongly. There may be less feeling but they go on to have normal lives and conform to their society.

You object because you think transgender don't conform?

FGM is becoming more rare even among extreme groups.

Does losing a penis make one less masculine? Whole military special forces and armies had either no penis or no "balls" and were considered among the more fierce warriors.

Why does it bother you?
 
Does losing a penis make one less masculine? Whole military special forces and armies had either no penis or no "balls" and were considered among the more fierce warriors.

Why does it bother you?

Nice strawman. In case you forgot, this thread is about drugging children with carcinogenic hormones to soften their already troubled minds to eventually "choose" (with chemical coercion no less) to have their healthy organs amputated. By MDs no less.

As I said before, if you're so cock-sure that these practices are defensible, then you won't mind erring on the side of caution where children are involved, following federal law that requires the reporting of MDs or anyone else for child abuse, and then letting those culpable defend themselves before a jury. If your "facts" are so solid, the jury will have no choice but to find in your favor.

However, that pesky little waiver the MDs make people sign before hormones or surgery that says "you realize this won't actually change your gender" is going to present monumental problems for the defense. I suggest you get on that ASAP. There will be a lawsuit soon. You'd better have your ducks in a row before that happens. And, the APA ain't gonna save you. The laws on child abuse apply to EVERY SINGLE PERSON within the US borders...regardless of their degree or position. Otherwise, therapists could rape children in their office and get away with it "because they're important credentialed people". It will be determined 1. "in any venue by anyone, is this child abuse?" If the answer is "yes", then no person is safe from prosecution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top