You first HYPOCRITE!!!Go home until you come up with something more substantial than a juvenile invective.LIAR!Actually it was YOUR hero's who told us that the world was cooling back in the 1970's, then they said no it's warming, then when the pause hit they changed to climate change (because lets face it, the climate is ALWAYS changing), and when that didn't pan out so good they changed it again to "global climate disruption" because they figured that they could blame any old storm on it, and they have, the problem is the storm frequency has DROPPED....oooooops.Deniers have been predicting this imminent ice-age non-stop for the past 40 years (deniers like to pretend it wasn't themselves making the cooling predictions). That ice age never arrives. In contrast, during that same time frame, the real scientists were predicting warming. They were proven to be correct. That's why climate science has such credibility. It earned that credibility through 40 years of getting everything right. And that's why denialism has zero credibility, because it's gotten everything wrong for 40 years. If deniers want credibility, they need to make predictions and see them come true.
So, I see some deniers here are stating positively that things will start cooling immediately. That's good. At least they're mustering up the courage to take a stand.
However, we know how this turns out. It keeps warming strongly. In a couple years, we ask the deniers why the cooling didn't happen, and they yell "Next year! You wait and see!". They've been moving those goalposts for 40 years, and aren't about to stop now.
So no, the only people who are provably hysterical are your hero's who have a fantastically bad prediction rate.
But thanks for playin!
You lie like the best of them but the problem is you're bad at it.
Is there spittle clinging to your chin there? How about addressing what I am saying instead of merely screaming and covering your ears.