Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I thought the lesson was well learned. trickle up or Keynes is the only answer to a bad economy. What method was used on Bush's disaster, trickle up or down?
No, you person who demands explanations he can't understand, trickle down is when the richest sectors are funded by [government policies], trickle up is when the poorest sectors are funded by [government policies]. But I quite understand that you can't understand.having money start at the top, with your Progressive Masters, and then redistributted ast they see fit IS TRICKLE-DOWN
Paying CEO's ..From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
That seems fair to you?
- That CEO pay grew far faster than pay of the top 0.1 percent of wage earners indicates that CEO compensation growth does not simply reflect the increased market value of highly paid professionals in a competitive market for skills (the “market for talent”) but reflects the presence of substantial rents embedded in executive pay (meaning CEO pay does not reflect greater productivity of executives). Consequently, if CEOs earned less or were taxed more, there would be no adverse impact on output or employment.
The stolen money starts at the beginning . Redistribution is when companies take advantage of the workers and do not pay them a fair marketable wage.
Those crying over being taxed are the culprits. The rich who exploit the workers and poor.
No, it's not.and that isnt trickle-down?
It's theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
the federal gasoline tax is three times what oil companies make on a gallon of gas. the rich can afford it idiot
tell me who exploits the workers and the poor??????
No, you person who demands explanations he can't understand, trickle down is when the richest sectors are funded by the government, trickle up is when the poorest sectors are funded by the government. But I quite understand that you can't understand.having money start at the top, with your Progressive Masters, and then redistributted ast they see fit IS TRICKLE-DOWN
No, you person who demands explanations he can't understand, trickle down is when the richest sectors are funded by [government policies], trickle up is when the poorest sectors are funded by [government policies]. But I quite understand that you can't understand.having money start at the top, with your Progressive Masters, and then redistributted ast they see fit IS TRICKLE-DOWN
The Bush disaster was the economy tanking when Bush was president. Did Bush use trickle up or down to begin to remedy the disaster?I thought the lesson was well learned. trickle up or Keynes is the only answer to a bad economy. What method was used on Bush's disaster, trickle up or down?
what is "Bush's disaster"???
not to insult you champ but you list the things Democrats opposed that caused that "disaster" and i'll list the things Democrats not only supported no matter what their numbers in Congress, but continued long after Bush was gone ok???
The Bush disaster was the economy tanking when Bush was president. Did Bush use trickle up or down to begin to remedy the disaster?I thought the lesson was well learned. trickle up or Keynes is the only answer to a bad economy. What method was used on Bush's disaster, trickle up or down?
what is "Bush's disaster"???
not to insult you champ but you list the things Democrats opposed that caused that "disaster" and i'll list the things Democrats not only supported no matter what their numbers in Congress, but continued long after Bush was gone ok???
The OP is confused.
We have created a Walmart wage system where the largest group of retail employees do not make enough to survive. This means they cannot be a government revenue source.
The money American workers formerly made in wages/benefits (during the postwar years) currently goes to ownership; hence the Walton family now makes all the surplus income (leaving the employees with only subsistence income).
Because ownership now makes all the surplus you'd think they would have a corresponding tax burden - especially because government stabilizes/defends their overseas oil fields and trade routes. Take a look at where Walmart products are made. Many of these products come from unstable parts of the globe that require a hugely expensive military to safeguard. So of course you'd think The wealthy would have a high tax burden to pay for this stuff. But ... They also benefit from an expensive, government run patent system whereby big brother puts a monopoly fence around the investments of the wealthy. And what about the expensive legal system which ensures that free market contracts are enforced (and thus adds confidence and security to all transactions)?
This stuff is expense and the benefits accrue to the wealthy, who you'd think would pay higher taxes to pay for it.
Nope, not after Reagan. The wealthy - the people making a surplus in our globalized low wage economy - only pay a pittance for the subsidies, bailouts, patents and military defense of their supply chains.
Where do we get the money to cover the shortfall created by Reagan's tax gift to the parasitic rentier class that owns government? We borrow it from future generations of poor workers who can't afford tax lawyers and lobbyists.
It's called redistribution, and it goes upward.
The OP needs to turn off talk radio.
Sure thing sparky.I would prefer just being paid a legit wage for my labor. Until companies can be left to their own devices to do that then yes government MUST be involved.
no matter how much of a slice the government takes to acheive that huh genius???
The Bush disaster was the economy tanking when Bush was president. Did Bush use trickle up or down to begin to remedy the disaster?I thought the lesson was well learned. trickle up or Keynes is the only answer to a bad economy. What method was used on Bush's disaster, trickle up or down?
what is "Bush's disaster"???
not to insult you champ but you list the things Democrats opposed that caused that "disaster" and i'll list the things Democrats not only supported no matter what their numbers in Congress, but continued long after Bush was gone ok???
Sure thing sparky.I would prefer just being paid a legit wage for my labor. Until companies can be left to their own devices to do that then yes government MUST be involved.
no matter how much of a slice the government takes to acheive that huh genius???
Yet the poorer sectors have received non of the productivity gains since Raygun. That's what I call class massacre.once again; the poorest sectors you keep mentioning are already funded to the tune of trillions per year and have been that way for decades
you are simply making a fool of yourself thinking you are advocating for a better system when in reality all it is is class warfare
No need to rebut shit from dumbasses.Sure thing sparky.I would prefer just being paid a legit wage for my labor. Until companies can be left to their own devices to do that then yes government MUST be involved.
no matter how much of a slice the government takes to acheive that huh genius???
nice rebuttal sparky
Jesus.ur too stupid to debate me
Well, if you use the roads, police, defense, and the regulations that keep the air, water and food clean. Why shouldn't you pay some taxes?
No need to rebut shit from dumbasses.Sure thing sparky.I would prefer just being paid a legit wage for my labor. Until companies can be left to their own devices to do that then yes government MUST be involved.
no matter how much of a slice the government takes to acheive that huh genius???
nice rebuttal sparky
