I dont mean the largest ass-hole. There are so many in the current Administration it would take a platoon of proctologists to determine the winner. My title refers to the Benghazi coverup. Ill begin at the beginning.
Benghazi is a perversion of President Truman firing General MacArthur in that there is a major rift between civilian authority and military responsibilities. Both sides of the Truman/MacArthur conflict were clear. Most Americans at the time agreed that Truman had the authority to fire MacArthur even though many believed he should not have done it. One thing was clear to everyone. Both men were doing what they thought was best for the country. Not so with Benghazi.
By not sending military help to Americans under attack Hussein & Company misused the military in pursuit of their global government agenda. They refuse to admit that America is at war against Islamic fundamentalism; so they try to appease all Muslims at Americas expense. Reason: They fear Muslim countries will walk out of the United Nations en mass. The very thought of standing up to Islams jihad never occurs to them.
HELP!
Note that the Clinton co-presidency never hesitated when it came to sending help to Muslims in the Balkans by bombing Christians; so Hillarys refusal to send help to Americans under attack in Benghazi is no surprise:
McCain literally forced Dempsey to say "I'm not blaming the State Department, . . .". Of course he was. If not the State Department it had to be the intelligence community or the military establishment.
The intelligence community controlled by Democrats would naturally not bat an eye while watching Americans die, but the scariest scenario of all is the one where the top brass in Americas military culture has finally signed on to the Democrat partys anti-sovereignty, pro-global government agenda administered by the United Nations. Since 1945 UN-loving Democrats have been working to replace top military leaders loyal to this country with military leaders who believe in global government. Theyve succeeded. As Ive said in the past:
The federal government and the US military have been thoroughly infiltrated by the very type of person the country was warned about in the Army-McCarthy hearings (1954). Unfortunately, one type of infiltrator escaped detection until recently. Nobody, myself included, separated hardcore Communists from global government traitors who might not be Communists.
There is ample evidence that the three branches of government were infiltrated by hardcore Communists and global government traitors, while few Americans realize that many staff officers in every branch of the armed services are more loyal to the United Nations than they are to the US Constitution.
I have to admit that I was never able to determine if global government traitors in the military constitute the majority. Benghazi indicates their is a serious conflict between loyal officers and global government officers. The following video is worth posting ONE MORE TIME because two of the players are up to their necks in the Benghazi coverup:
Also, let me repeat how they get away treason:
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UNs behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
Stand-down
The order to stand-down permeates the aftermath of the Benghazi attack. Stand-down means A withdrawal, as of a military presence. Somebody sure as hell withdrew (RETREATED) in Benghazi before the battle was lost. So who should Hussein fire if the order to stand-down did NOT originate with him? Answer: The originator of the stand-down order.
General McInerney goes on to say:
Now lets address the Grand Canyon of holes.
Nobody knew how long the men under attack could hold out, nor did anybody know if the attackers would logically assume that help was surely on the way and back off. So how can anybody in the Administration say that help would NOT have arrived in time to do any good?
Finally, I believe that Hussein & Company now realize the hole in their story is too large to close. The question is: How come Senate and House Committees are not asking about the largest hole?
Benghazi is a perversion of President Truman firing General MacArthur in that there is a major rift between civilian authority and military responsibilities. Both sides of the Truman/MacArthur conflict were clear. Most Americans at the time agreed that Truman had the authority to fire MacArthur even though many believed he should not have done it. One thing was clear to everyone. Both men were doing what they thought was best for the country. Not so with Benghazi.
By not sending military help to Americans under attack Hussein & Company misused the military in pursuit of their global government agenda. They refuse to admit that America is at war against Islamic fundamentalism; so they try to appease all Muslims at Americas expense. Reason: They fear Muslim countries will walk out of the United Nations en mass. The very thought of standing up to Islams jihad never occurs to them.
HELP!
Note that the Clinton co-presidency never hesitated when it came to sending help to Muslims in the Balkans by bombing Christians; so Hillarys refusal to send help to Americans under attack in Benghazi is no surprise:
Dempsey then said that a contingent was not sent because the State Department didn't request one.
"So it's the State Department's fault," McCain challenged.
"I'm not blaming the State Department," Dempsey responded. "I'm sure they had their own assessment."
Dempsey said he stood by the conclusion of an independent review board, which concluded the "interagency response was timely and appropriate, but there simply was not enough time, given the speed of the attacks, for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference."
Panetta, Dempsey defend U.S. response to Benghazi attack
By Ashley Fantz, CNN
updated 9:07 PM EST, Thu February 7, 2013
Panetta, Dempsey defend U.S. response to Benghazi attack - CNN.com
McCain literally forced Dempsey to say "I'm not blaming the State Department, . . .". Of course he was. If not the State Department it had to be the intelligence community or the military establishment.
The intelligence community controlled by Democrats would naturally not bat an eye while watching Americans die, but the scariest scenario of all is the one where the top brass in Americas military culture has finally signed on to the Democrat partys anti-sovereignty, pro-global government agenda administered by the United Nations. Since 1945 UN-loving Democrats have been working to replace top military leaders loyal to this country with military leaders who believe in global government. Theyve succeeded. As Ive said in the past:
The federal government and the US military have been thoroughly infiltrated by the very type of person the country was warned about in the Army-McCarthy hearings (1954). Unfortunately, one type of infiltrator escaped detection until recently. Nobody, myself included, separated hardcore Communists from global government traitors who might not be Communists.
There is ample evidence that the three branches of government were infiltrated by hardcore Communists and global government traitors, while few Americans realize that many staff officers in every branch of the armed services are more loyal to the United Nations than they are to the US Constitution.
I have to admit that I was never able to determine if global government traitors in the military constitute the majority. Benghazi indicates their is a serious conflict between loyal officers and global government officers. The following video is worth posting ONE MORE TIME because two of the players are up to their necks in the Benghazi coverup:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUhYX6Crsa4&feature=player_embedded]Def Secretary Panetta tells Senator Sessions U.S. military gets authority from UN or NATO.flv - YouTube[/ame]
Also, let me repeat how they get away treason:
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UNs behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
Stand-down
The order to stand-down permeates the aftermath of the Benghazi attack. Stand-down means A withdrawal, as of a military presence. Somebody sure as hell withdrew (RETREATED) in Benghazi before the battle was lost. So who should Hussein fire if the order to stand-down did NOT originate with him? Answer: The originator of the stand-down order.
McInerney said the tell-tale sign of Obamas dereliction of duty can be determined in the admitted White House narrative of the presidents actions as the terrorist attack played out the night of Sept. 11, 2012.
When is the exact minute he knew? We dont have the timeline, and it was well before the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff went over there. He only talked to the secretary of defense one time, so its obvious he knew that he had given the stand-down order and did not need to talk to the secretary of defense or anybody else after that, McInerney said.
XXXXX
He also insists the stand-down order could only come from one source: the president himself.
The only person who could have given it was the president, and he had to give it through the secretary of defense, secretary of state. The word came out so it came from the combatant commands and other unites below, but nobody could have given that except the president of the United States, . . ..
While he believes Obama has a lot to answer for, McInerney made it clear that many top-level subordinates deserve a lot of the blame too, and thats what makes the scandal so troubling.
XXXXX
The general also singled out former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her comment at congressional hearings in January in which she bristled severely at accusations the administration concocted a plan to blame the attack on a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Islam YouTube video that got out of hand. Clinton slammed Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, saying, What difference, at this point, does it make?
McInerney sees that as a low point in American history.
That is one of the most despicable statements that any American has said about such a tragic incident when you lose people like that.
General McInerney goes on to say:
McInerney said the administrations story is full of holes on a number of fronts,. . .
Benghazi makes Watergate 'look like kindergarten'
General: 'A dereliction of duty this nation has never seen before'
Published: 14 hours ago
Benghazi makes Watergate ?look like kindergarten?
Now lets address the Grand Canyon of holes.
Nobody knew how long the men under attack could hold out, nor did anybody know if the attackers would logically assume that help was surely on the way and back off. So how can anybody in the Administration say that help would NOT have arrived in time to do any good?
Finally, I believe that Hussein & Company now realize the hole in their story is too large to close. The question is: How come Senate and House Committees are not asking about the largest hole?