The Gullibility of Liberals is Abundant

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,756
2,220
Here are just two cases, from Huffington Posts idiotic failure to backcheck this bogus argument to end voting privileges for white males to a scientist sending in a pile of gibberish to a liberal postmodern review and getting it published.

The Establishment left has forgotten how to think critically. No wonder the Dimmocrats are the constant loser in elections.

Sly Hoaxer Who Humiliated the Huffington Post Has Lost His Job

Earlier this week, the gullible Huffington Post fell victim to a hoax article calling for white men to be stripped of their voting rights. The site became the subject of widespread derision and condemnation after HuffPost editors stood up to defend the article’s content.

But as was later revealed, the author submitted the piece to Huffington Post South Africa as a hoax, intending to prove a point about the outlet’s radical leftist stance. He did so under a fake persona masquerading as a feminist activist named “Shelly Garland.” He has since lost his job after being outed by the site.

Following its publication and subsequent retraction, the HuffPost identified the author behind the “Shelly Garland” persona as Marius Roodt, a researcher at South Africa’s Centre for Development and Enterprise. According to the site, the email address Roodt used to submit the piece was traced back to him. The site claims that his identity was further “confirmed with facial recognition technology,” as he digitally altered a picture of himself to look like a woman.​

Sokal affair - Wikipedia

The Sokal affair, also called the Sokal hoax,[1] was a publishing hoax perpetrated by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London. In 1996, Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of postmodern cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies – whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross – [would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions".[2]

The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity",[3] was published in the Social Text spring/summer 1996 "Science Wars" issue. It proposed that quantum gravity is a social and linguistic construct. At that time, the journal did not practice academic peer review and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist.[4][5] On the day of its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in Lingua Franca that the article was a hoax, identifying it as "a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense [...] structured around the silliest quotations [by postmodernist academics] he could find about mathematics and physics".[2]

The hoax sparked a debate about the scholarly merit of humanistic commentary about the physical sciences; the influence of postmodern philosophy on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of Social Text; and whether Social Text had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor.​
 
You seem to imply that liberals might not all need to have a brain transplant with a Chicken to increase their intelligence but it certainly wouldn't hurt do I have that right?
 
I bet if thoroughly researched most of their articles contain nothing but hogwash.
 
It is just stupid to suggest that anyone should be stripped of their right to vote...

Please stop being so partisan.

Sane Americans overwhelmingly support stripping invading foreign criminals of their “right” to vote. You, of course, are on the side that is staunchly opposed to any measures to prevent this, or any other form of voter fraud. Yours is the side that openly seeks to strip legitimate citizens of their right to vote, or at least to undermine this right, by allowing the electoral process to be corrupted, and allowing legitimate votes to be diluted by fraudulent votes cast by those not eligible to cast them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top