The Great Unraveling of Lie-a-Watha Warren

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by Zander, Sep 27, 2012.

  1. Zander
    Offline

    Zander Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,452
    Thanks Received:
    6,575
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Los Angeles CA
    Ratings:
    +12,894
    The lies continue to mount. Now it turns out- she practiced law in Massachusetts without a license......How anyone can trust this woman is beyond me....

    » Elizabeth Warren represented Massachusetts client in Massachusetts - Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion

    The rest of the article is pretty damning for Ms Warren as well...she's coming apart at the seams.

    She has been lying about her ancestry to gain preferential treatment, she's plagiarized recipes and published them as her own, and now it turns out she's practiced law in a state she is not licensed to do so. Clearly she believes she is above the law, that she is somehow "special".

    She is not Senate material. She can't be trusted.
     
  2. DauggyDaddy
    Offline

    DauggyDaddy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    38
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +14
    You guys REALLY think this nonsense helps your candidate? Who, other than yourselves, do you think is being swayed by this crap in favor of your candidate? They've already debunnked this silliness, and established that Elizabeth Warren broke no rules in Massachusetts. Sorry, but that dog won't hunt. Is Brown completely unable to debate ISSUES in this race? Is he REALLY that bad off?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,449
    Thanks Received:
    19,869
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,482
    Welcome to USMB....See what you missed?

    And it is still 40 days to the election
     
  4. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    [​IMG]

    Chief Wild Eagle approves! :lol:
     
  5. PLYMCO_PILGRIM
    Offline

    PLYMCO_PILGRIM Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    17,416
    Thanks Received:
    2,855
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    America's Home Town
    Ratings:
    +2,863
    Well the facts are that both in the asbestos case and the steel worker case Elisabeth Warren actually fought to help the companies pay less money out to their employees. This looks really bad for her when she is running on "I fight for the working person"

    Also her complete dishonesty in claiming to be a minority when applying to Harvard, effectively giving her a dishonest advantage due to a false minority status claim and affirmative action, both point to her as having a lack of character.

    Do I want Scott Brown who has a track record and has actually passed useful legislation that even the President signed (more than once) or Elisabeth Warren who claims one thing about her actions when something else is true or is dishonest about her race when applying to Harvard to get a leg up through affirmative action?

    I'll go with the guy who fought for veterans to get jobs (and passed legislation to do so), for people to not be able to lie about being a veteran, and passed legislation making it illegal for congress to do insider trading...Scott Brown

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Zander
    Offline

    Zander Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,452
    Thanks Received:
    6,575
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Los Angeles CA
    Ratings:
    +12,894
    He's a good family man who's isn't hiding anything. He's an experienced hands on guy with a track record.

    She's an opportunist that has been caught in numerous lies and misleading statements.
    She's an academician, another dilettante.

    It's an easy decision.....
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. PLYMCO_PILGRIM
    Offline

    PLYMCO_PILGRIM Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    17,416
    Thanks Received:
    2,855
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    America's Home Town
    Ratings:
    +2,863
    You are right Zander he is a good man and has actually passed good legislation in his short 2 year term. Elisabeth has only told us half truths about her motives in checking the native american box, the reason she fought to reduce the claims of employees in the abestos case, and why she fought to lessen the claims of employees with the steel mill case.

    IF that wasn't bad enough she was the oversight panel chairman who was originally tasked with overseeing TARP and we know how well that worked out for the little guys

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWXd-7e91qw]Elizabeth Warren Cares About The 99% - YouTube[/ame]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    47,731
    Thanks Received:
    4,712
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +16,016
    Another lying racist dumbass thread.

    More: Right-Wing Bloggers' "Law License" Attack On Elizabeth Warren Falls Flat | Blog | Media Matters for America
     
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Fine critique, coming from a lying racist dumbass, citing a a lying racist dumbass source. :lol:
     
  10. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,360
    It's really a shame Democrats don't hold their politicians to a higher standard..

    If they did we might not have this Overbearing money grabbing Federal Government we have today

    I'm afraid all is lost
     

Share This Page