Anathema
Crotchety Olde Man
I felt this was adequately addressed in "The Investigation" section as follows:
If, on the other hand, governmental law is in perfect harmony with the individual’s moral standard, we may say that one of the standards is redundant, and thus irrelevant (or non-existent). If the moral standard is held as primary and dictates that murder is wrong, and governmental law also dictates that murder is wrong, it can be seen that the governmental law was not the authoritative standard that prohibited the action, as the action was already prohibited by the moral standard. The governmental law becomes a meaningless echo, as the individual did not refrain from the action on its authority. The adherence to such a law occurred merely by coincidence.
Do you feel this does not suffice?
Moral laws always supersede Civil laws, as the issuing authority (The Divine) is far superseding to any mortal authority. However, when the two laws agree the Civil law is still necessary for the Government to enact Justice and Punishment on the offender.