The End of 'Values' in Society

[PoliticalChic]

Did you know the enemies within Israel could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship! Sound like a familiar strategy? It should!

"....could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship!"



1. 'As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."
"The Black Book of Communism," p.123-124.

a. April 22nd is Lenin's birthday.
And, by coincidence.....the celebration by the eco-fascists, Earth Day.






2. While Lenin said "Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."

Here....the American communist version:
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."

Rahm Emanuel

 

[PoliticalChic]

The End of 'Values' in Society

Given the propensity of conservatives to lie and contrive ‘controversies’ where none exist, the right’s hostility toward the civil liberties of gay Americans, women, and minority voters, and republican administrations starting illegal wars predicated on lies, it is clear that conservative doctrine and dogma are responsible for an ‘end’ of values in society.

"...the propensity of conservatives to lie and contrive ‘controversies’ where none exist,..."

Doesn't exist, you moron???




13. The Left hardly even admits to the catastrophe of end of the oldest human institution, monogamy and the family unit, much less their role in the breakdown.


As Charles Murray has pointed out (see "Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010,") adding to the problem is the fact that Liberal educated elites don't "preach what they practice:" contrary to what they advocate for lesser folks, they keep their families together, defer childbirth until marriage, send their children to good colleges, and embrace an ethic of ambition.



For the lower classes, they are fine sending the message that marriage doesn't matter, and that illegitimacy is no big deal, and that being on the public dole is as good as earning one's own way in life.


And imbeciles go about mouthing absurdities like "contrive "‘controversies’ where none exist..."





And one party, the Democrat Party, actually endorses this as a strategy!
Called "Identity Politics," by which they peel off low-income women, the most vulnerable constituency, and turn them into a Democrat voting bloc dependent on government, it has destroyed the economy, and the national character.



The Left claims that the Republican Party is too old and too white.....

..."Too married" would be more appropriate.

 

[Moonglow]

When was the last time you heard the word "sin"?

Heck, it's rare that the word is even uttered in church. ..

What Christian church do you attend?

 

[Disir]

You don't have values. You have fear.

 

[Moonglow]

For the lower classes, they are fine sending the message that marriage doesn't matter, and that illegitimacy is no big deal, and that being on the public dole is as good as earning one's own way in life.

So this author believes in a class caste system in the US, how funny.


I am a a liberal as is my wife, yet we are married and had a child 4 years after being married and we both have jobs...shoots the authors premise all to hell...

Same with my second wife and my first...

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Did you know the enemies within Israel could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship! Sound like a familiar strategy? It should!

"....could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship!"



1. 'As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."
"The Black Book of Communism," p.123-124.

a. April 22nd is Lenin's birthday.
And, by coincidence.....the celebration by the eco-fascists, Earth Day.






2. While Lenin said "Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."

Here....the American communist version:
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."

Rahm Emanuel

I agree. Lenin was a hater of God just as Marx and Stalin were. The goal of communism is first to destroy faith in God because otherwise they cannot "progress" to the next stage.

In the reference to King Reheboam, the kingdom was invaded by the Assyrians in his fifth year of rule. The nation was stripped of its gold, wealth and the kingdom was split in half. The first thing King Rehoboam did was to dismiss all of the wise counselors and appoint foolish ones. He listened to the wrong people. It took 5 yrs for their enemies to invade. Will we share a similar fate? I think it is possible.

p.s. Hitlers birthday was April 20th. Interesting that Lenins birthday was a couple of days later. The famous satanic altar that Hitler used in his occult rituals - called "the seat of satan" was dismantled and taken to Russia after WWII. An exact replica was made for Lenins tomb stone.

 

[whitehall]

It must be pretty easy to run for office as a democrat. They don't have to worry about a failure to live up to "family values" because they make no claim of it. You can see it in posts. Every time a republican is accused of adultery the "family values" snarky comments come out from the left but nobody expects democrats to live up to any social values.

 

[Moonglow]

Did you know the enemies within Israel could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship! Sound like a familiar strategy? It should!

"....could not bring her to her knees until they removed the worship to the LORD and replaced it with idol worship!"



1. 'As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."
"The Black Book of Communism," p.123-124.

a. April 22nd is Lenin's birthday.
And, by coincidence.....the celebration by the eco-fascists, Earth Day.






2. While Lenin said "Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too."

Here....the American communist version:
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."

Rahm Emanuel

I agree. Lenin was a hater of God just as Marx and Stalin were. The goal of communism is first to destroy faith in God because otherwise they cannot "progress" to the next stage.

In the reference to King Reheboam, the kingdom was invaded by the Assyrians in his fifth year of rule. The nation was stripped of its gold, wealth and the kingdom was split in half. The first thing King Rehoboam did was to dismiss all of the wise counselors and appoint foolish ones. He listened to the wrong people. It took 5 yrs for their enemies to invade. Will we share a similar fate? I think it is possible.

p.s. Hitlers birthday was April 20th. Interesting that Lenins birthday was a couple of days later. The famous satanic altar that Hitler used in his occult rituals - called "the seat of satan" was dismantled and taken to Russia after WWII. An exact replica was made for Lenins tomb stone.

yet Hitler believed in the power of Christ, he coveted the Spear of Destiny and even made sure to obtain it when he invaded Austria..

 

[Moonglow]

It must be pretty easy to run for office as a democrat. They don't have to worry about a failure to live up to "family values" because they make no claim of it. You can see it in posts. Every time a republican is accused of adultery the "family values" snarky comments come out from the left but nobody expects democrats to live up to any social values.

Yeah the president is not married and has kids out of wedlock, anymore fallacies I can straighten out?

 

[Ceminus]

I find myself a rather new student of politics so what I have to say on this I hope no one takes as an attack but rather I have a few questions and observations:

1.) what are common values, does anyone in America (world larger stage) have true common values.

2.) If you study a large majority of societies, Women often held a greater position of influence at least in some sense of the word, In some societies they held the land rights or the right to choose their spouse ect.

3.) I have often looked into what makes up "our" morals, and sometimes I wonder how much of them are "our" morals and values, that is to say some groups in America have been heavily influenced by the loudest, most forward advocates of and idea and the adoption of some of these values isn't always our own. Just look how abolitionist influenced Kansas during Civil war (when was war ever Civil?)

 

[guno]

What we are witnessing is the last howling and lashing out of Reich wing in America, they will become more hysterical as the demographic shift keeps rolling and as we have seen some of them will violently lash out .


Then you have kooks like
Ann Coulter who likens U.S. demographic shift to ‘being raped,’

Ann Coulter likens U.S. demographic shift to ?being raped,? blames Democrats | The Raw Story

Or the white wannabe token Michelle Malkin

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

It is a warning that we are headed in the wrong direction, Guno. Howling? Interesting choice of words by you. - Jeri

 

[PoliticalChic]

For the lower classes, they are fine sending the message that marriage doesn't matter, and that illegitimacy is no big deal, and that being on the public dole is as good as earning one's own way in life.

So this author believes in a class caste system in the US, how funny.


I am a a liberal as is my wife, yet we are married and had a child 4 years after being married and we both have jobs...shoots the authors premise all to hell...

Same with my second wife and my first...

"...this author believes in a class caste system in the US, how funny."

PLeeeeeezzzzeee.....

...don't play the fool.

We have tons of Liberals already ensconced in that capacity.



Nor is it funny at all....which is essentially the point of the OP. It is the end of our American culture.


Of course we have several classes in society.


There are classes based on education, and on wealth....and the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

No....in order to accrue votes, and power, the Liberal establishment pats those whose values include dependency and illegitimacy on the back, saying 'go for it!.'




a. Case in point:
“For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/us/for-women-under-30-most-births-occur-outside-marriage.html


b. “One group still largely resists the trend: college graduates, who overwhelmingly marry before having children. That is turning family structure into a new class divide, …” Ibid.



Of course, you were admitting same in the rest of your post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It must be pretty easy to run for office as a democrat. They don't have to worry about a failure to live up to "family values" because they make no claim of it. You can see it in posts. Every time a republican is accused of adultery the "family values" snarky comments come out from the left but nobody expects democrats to live up to any social values.

It is, in fact, the secret weapon of Obama's icon, Saul Alinsky.
He knew that, try as they may, the Right was still made up of human beings, with the commensurate foibles.

Here:

"For example, since the Haves publicly pose as the custodians of responsibility, morality, law, and justice (which are frequently strangers to each others), they can be constantly pushed to live up to their own book of morality and regulations. No organizations, including organized religion, can live up to the letter of its own book. You can club them to death with their "book" of rules and regulations. This is what that great revolutionary, Paul of Tarsus, knew when he wrote to the Corinthians: "Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit, for the letter killeth."
Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals, P.152


The Left simply says 'forget the rules,' or....from the 60s counter-culture, 'if it feels good, do it.'

Yup....pretty easy.

 

[Moonglow]

Sometime readers are not aware of my sarcastic sardonic nature...

let me fill you in...


If ladies like those of the past would only wear a chastity belt, things would be better...
America has always had a caste system....the rich will not allow it to be any different...

 

[PoliticalChic]

It must be pretty easy to run for office as a democrat. They don't have to worry about a failure to live up to "family values" because they make no claim of it. You can see it in posts. Every time a republican is accused of adultery the "family values" snarky comments come out from the left but nobody expects democrats to live up to any social values.

Yeah the president is not married and has kids out of wedlock, anymore fallacies I can straighten out?

So you insist on being a fool.

OK....get in line.

Your premise, it seems, is that 100% must conform or the statement....in this case the detrimental effects of Liberalism....is untrue.




Did you know that LBJ altered the AFDC regulations set in place by FDR?

1966 LBJ expanded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program…under FDR, AFDC had been limited to widows, those who had lost their husbands and now lacked a breadwinner at home to help support the children.

Then began to loosen and expand the rules of AFDC eligibility, eventually getting to the point where any woman living alone with children could take advantage of this program. In doing so, they not only bought a large number of new votes, they also incentivized out of wedlock births and single motherhood.

As Charles Murray described in “Losing Ground,” the Great Society incentivized the same negative behaviors that cause poverty in the first place.

Millions of women discovered that they could be better off financially by not marrying.



And LBJ was married.

So?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sometime readers are not aware of my sarcastic sardonic nature...

let me fill you in...


If ladies like those of the past would only wear a chastity belt, things would be better...
America has always had a caste system....the rich will not allow it to be any different...

"...my sarcastic sardonic nature..."

Actually, I appreciate the fact, and the case that in your attempts to be so, you provide a typical Liberal's response....

...thereby giving me the opportunity to slam same.





You do realize, however, that numerous brain-dead Liberal posters actually believe what you pretend to believe.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sometime readers are not aware of my sarcastic sardonic nature...

let me fill you in...


If ladies like those of the past would only wear a chastity belt, things would be better...
America has always had a caste system....the rich will not allow it to be any different...

BTW....there is no such perennial class as "the rich."

1. New figures from Smart Money show that only 3% of millionaires inherited their wealth. That means 97% earned their vast fortune themselves. Smart Money also reports that 80% of millionaires are extra thrifty shoppers. Many of them even clip coupons! "

Millionaires clip coupons and other secrets of the rich! | www.clarkhoward.com



2. "In the Millionaire Next Door," Stanley and Danko tell us that "most of America's millionaires are first-generation rich." They earned their money themselves. Not through inheritances or dad's teachings. "Most people who become millionaires have confidence in their own abilities. They do not spend time worrying about whether or not their parents were wealthy."
The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy
by Thomas J. Stanley, William D. Danko




Liberals have been trained to foam at the mouth when the phrase 'the rich' comes up.

 

[Moonglow]

It must be pretty easy to run for office as a democrat. They don't have to worry about a failure to live up to "family values" because they make no claim of it. You can see it in posts. Every time a republican is accused of adultery the "family values" snarky comments come out from the left but nobody expects democrats to live up to any social values.

Yeah the president is not married and has kids out of wedlock, anymore fallacies I can straighten out?

So you insist on being a fool.

OK....get in line.

Your premise, it seems, is that 100% must conform or the statement....in this case the detrimental effects of Liberalism....is untrue.




Did you know that LBJ altered the AFDC regulations set in place by FDR?

1966 LBJ expanded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program…under FDR, AFDC had been limited to widows, those who had lost their husbands and now lacked a breadwinner at home to help support the children.

Then began to loosen and expand the rules of AFDC eligibility, eventually getting to the point where any woman living alone with children could take advantage of this program. In doing so, they not only bought a large number of new votes, they also incentivized out of wedlock births and single motherhood.

As Charles Murray described in “Losing Ground,” the Great Society incentivized the same negative behaviors that cause poverty in the first place.

Millions of women discovered that they could be better off financially by not marrying.



And LBJ was married.

So?

Seemed to be a silly move on LBJ's part, but you know how politicians are, yet as we see, after LBJ we had how many GOP presidents? And as of yet not one has repealed the move by LBJ, not even when we had a president GOP and a GOP led Congress..

 

[Moonglow]

Sometime readers are not aware of my sarcastic sardonic nature...

let me fill you in...


If ladies like those of the past would only wear a chastity belt, things would be better...
America has always had a caste system....the rich will not allow it to be any different...

BTW....there is no such perennial class as "the rich."

1. New figures from Smart Money show that only 3% of millionaires inherited their wealth. That means 97% earned their vast fortune themselves. Smart Money also reports that 80% of millionaires are extra thrifty shoppers. Many of them even clip coupons! "

Millionaires clip coupons and other secrets of the rich! | www.clarkhoward.com



2. "In the Millionaire Next Door," Stanley and Danko tell us that "most of America's millionaires are first-generation rich." They earned their money themselves. Not through inheritances or dad's teachings. "Most people who become millionaires have confidence in their own abilities. They do not spend time worrying about whether or not their parents were wealthy."
The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy
by Thomas J. Stanley, William D. Danko




Liberals have been trained to foam at the mouth when the phrase 'the rich' comes up.

I mostly drool...........Like I do when I visit my rich Mom and dad....and I fall asleep in the splendor of their couch...