The Death of Objective Journalism

[Google]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics. The media walked the line, or more accurately blurred it, between activist and reporter. Well they now are abandoning that facade and openly campaign for Clinton.

Trump has elicited such unabashed hatred and fear that the media has a whole has decided that it is not only ethically justified to selectively report on this election to favor Clinton it is morally imperative. This is a turning point in American journalism.

All of the Republicans that are essentially siding with Clinton miss the substance of what Trump represents. Or rather what the reaction from the left on college campuses, the media, and the threat of violence at those who exercise their first amendment rights and support a presidential candidate. Trump needs to stay the course, because it serves to highlight the absurdity of the left. If conservatives can't circle the wagon and at the very least protect our own, then we will never have another conservative presidency.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/b...-provocative-presidential-candidate.html?_r=0

 

[Moonglow]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

 

[Hossfly]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

The media are the emotional 'drug dealers.'

 

[Google]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

Well that's quit an interesting take. The Reagan era forced the media to cover the government's attempt at fighting drug trafficking and the countless murders and violence that it causes. Right.

During Clinton the media was forced to protect a man with a history of sexual assault accusations avoid impeachment for knowingly lying under oath. And when Hillary and Bill came out and savaged the character of the victims, the media sided with the Clintons. That is quite a change in ethics and aesthetics.

 

[Dekster]

 

[Moonglow]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

Well that's quit an interesting take. The Reagan era forced the media to cover the government's attempt at fighting drug trafficking and the countless murders and violence that it causes. Right.

During Clinton the media was forced to protect a man with a history of sexual assault accusations avoid impeachment for knowingly lying under oath. And when Hillary and Bill came out and savaged the character of the victims, the media sided with the Clintons. That is quite a change in ethics and aesthetics.

Reagan forced the use of public service announcements as part of broadcasting.....No one forced the media outlets to cover or have and opinion except the board of directors...

 

[Google]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

Well that's quit an interesting take. The Reagan era forced the media to cover the government's attempt at fighting drug trafficking and the countless murders and violence that it causes. Right.

During Clinton the media was forced to protect a man with a history of sexual assault accusations avoid impeachment for knowingly lying under oath. And when Hillary and Bill came out and savaged the character of the victims, the media sided with the Clintons. That is quite a change in ethics and aesthetics.

Reagan forced the use of public service announcements as part of broadcasting.....No one forced the media outlets to cover or have and opinion except the board of directors...

Yes, a widely popular US President spoke directly to the people about an issue that was ravaging black communities, causing murderous violence in Miami--and to you that is indicative of journalistic improprieties?

The Fairness Doctrine literally and openly censored political speech, favoring liberals and preventing the rise of Conservative media. And the media overwhelmingly supported it and still advocates for its return.

 

[Moonglow]

The media, despite its espoused virtues of objectivity, has historically been advocates for left-leaning causes and politics..


Untrue, as"the media" has changed in ethics and aesthetics over the last 35 years...The Reagan era forced media to advertise the conservative anti-drug propaganda..

Well that's quit an interesting take. The Reagan era forced the media to cover the government's attempt at fighting drug trafficking and the countless murders and violence that it causes. Right.

During Clinton the media was forced to protect a man with a history of sexual assault accusations avoid impeachment for knowingly lying under oath. And when Hillary and Bill came out and savaged the character of the victims, the media sided with the Clintons. That is quite a change in ethics and aesthetics.

Reagan forced the use of public service announcements as part of broadcasting.....No one forced the media outlets to cover or have and opinion except the board of directors...

Yes, a widely popular US President spoke directly to the people about an issue that was ravaging black communities, causing murderous violence in Miami--and to you that is indicative of journalistic improprieties?

The Fairness Doctrine literally and openly censored political speech, favoring liberals and preventing the rise of Conservative media. And the media overwhelmingly supported it and still advocates for its return.

There are no shortage of country music power stations blasting the air waves......and on country stations are what? Conservative views...Yuk.... No shortage of christian radio stations in the area also...Now as far as TV....That's a corporate shell game...the big boys play there..you better come stacked with a big roll or walk....GE and Comcast own the market share....
But the light on the horizon is the internet....

 

[Stratford57]

Media has been successfully used by Globalists for brainwashing the taxpayers and to make them easy to be manipulated. The majority of Americans live in a parallel world "behind the mirrors" , even Lewis Carroll would be jealous to those fairy tales, which Western Media keeps creating for its audience.

Last century the Western world was making fun of the USSR living behind the Iron Curtain, now the West lives behind that Iron Curtain itself.

 

[Moonglow]

Media is used by Globalists for brainwashing the taxpayers and to make them easy to be manipulated.

Business does the same thing, what's new?