The Basic Case Against Judge Sullivan in Flynn case

[forkup]

You mean the draft versions of the report?

Flynn lied. He testified under oath. The judge saw the material and said there were no substantive changes between the drafts and the final and threw out the claim.

Bullshit.

If the police suspect that you were speeding, do they have the legal right to rape your wife and continue to do so until you confess?

Because that is EXACTLY what the Inquisition did with Gen. Flynn. When Andrew Weissman who headed the Inquisition (we now know that Grand Inquisitor Mueller-Torquemada was in the 4th stage of Alzheimer's and was a figurehead to distract from the makeup of the witch hunt) moved to try and get Flynn to perjure himself against the president, which was the purpose of the entrapment that Comey and Obama had devised, the LtG. refused. Weissman used the traditional tactics of the KGB, he bankrupted the LtG. He froze the bank accounts and any securities as to deny the LtG. any defense.

But this failed, so Weissman and his gangsters threatened LtG. Flynn's lawyers, Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony. We now know, thanks to the document release, that Weissman engaged in extortion of Covington & Burling (C&B) the firm that employed Flynn's defense team, by making the credible threat that if Kelner and Anthony did not convince LtG. Flynn to confess, the KGB and department of Injustice would launch an assault on C&B. In other words, they compromised the Flynn defense team to work against the interests of their client through extortion to destroy their firm if they did not.

This did not work, at least not initially. KGB agent Peter Strzok along with KGB lawyer Lisa Page cooked up some fabricated charges against the son of LtG. Flynn (also Michael) based on the now discredited Russian Collusion conspiracy theory. The KGB and department of Injustice basically took a page from the 14th century Spanish Inquisition. In that first inquisition they would rape the wife and daughters of the victim until they confessed. Many men would stand up to the torture that Torquemada would levy, but the attacks on their family would break them.

So that's what our KGB and DOI did, they raped Flynn's family, Crooked fuck Weissman is on tape in the newly released exculpatory evidence telling Flynn that if he doesn't confess, they will throw HIS SON in prison and sell his grandchildren into slavery (place them in foster care). Meanwhile they cut a side deal with Kelner and Anthony to back off of C&B, whom the department of Injustice had already begun assaulting AND drop the bogus charges against Flynn Jr. if they would JUST GET FLYNN TO CONFESS.

Flynn had lost his home, every dime he had, and now the gangsters were attacking his family. He withstood more coercion than 90% of us would, but he finally confessed to the fabricated charges by the KGB.

WE KNOW ALL OF THIS, it's in the document dump.

Yet that corrupt pile of shit Sullivan obstructs justice.

Copy paste much?
I already explained why your analogy is flawed. Rape is a crime. Catching a person on lies isn't. Neither is threatening to charge someone's family since the only way that works is when that family is also culpable. Coercing someone to plead guilty is not a crime. In fact, it's by far the most common way a plea deal will ever be obtained. Under the law, the only concern is whether or not this coercion violates the rights of the accused or society.

Raping family falls under that heading. What happened to Flynn clearly doesn't. What I find interesting is that you are trying to make claims that even the motion to dismiss didn't cite.

 

[forkup]

If someone stands in a courtroom, gets sworn in, pleads guilty to something and then claims he didn't do what he claimed he did later. Does he not, in fact, commit perjury?

Not if he is coerced in ether or both cases, dipshit.

Interesting, how would both be coerced? His lawyer orders him to revise his guilty plea?

I'm still here.

You KNOW that Strzok engaged in extortion against Covington & Burling to force LtG. Flynn's lawyers, Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony to pressure him into making the false and coerced confession.

Did you think it was safe to come out lying again? Sorry, not the case.

Consider this, we either have the rule of law, or we don't. IF we don't, there is no reason in the world NOT to drag Emmett Sullivan out into the streets and beat him.

Are you Marxists SURE you want to destroy the rule of law? Absolutely sure?

Link this assertion please, you keep on making it without ever supporting it.

 

[forkup]

I just proved that Sullivan issued a new charge, and you agreed it was not his prerogative.
Why are you back?

Because he is a deranged leftwing ideologue that cannot understand anything outside his own narrow ideological perspective.

I suggest you look at post 50. In it, you will see other judges use their prerogative of adding charges.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You mean the draft versions of the report?

Flynn lied. He testified under oath. The judge saw the material and said there were no substantive changes between the drafts and the final and threw out the claim.

Bullshit.

If the police suspect that you were speeding, do they have the legal right to rape your wife and continue to do so until you confess?

Because that is EXACTLY what the Inquisition did with Gen. Flynn. When Andrew Weissman who headed the Inquisition (we now know that Grand Inquisitor Mueller-Torquemada was in the 4th stage of Alzheimer's and was a figurehead to distract from the makeup of the witch hunt) moved to try and get Flynn to perjure himself against the president, which was the purpose of the entrapment that Comey and Obama had devised, the LtG. refused. Weissman used the traditional tactics of the KGB, he bankrupted the LtG. He froze the bank accounts and any securities as to deny the LtG. any defense.

But this failed, so Weissman and his gangsters threatened LtG. Flynn's lawyers, Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony. We now know, thanks to the document release, that Weissman engaged in extortion of Covington & Burling (C&B) the firm that employed Flynn's defense team, by making the credible threat that if Kelner and Anthony did not convince LtG. Flynn to confess, the KGB and department of Injustice would launch an assault on C&B. In other words, they compromised the Flynn defense team to work against the interests of their client through extortion to destroy their firm if they did not.

This did not work, at least not initially. KGB agent Peter Strzok along with KGB lawyer Lisa Page cooked up some fabricated charges against the son of LtG. Flynn (also Michael) based on the now discredited Russian Collusion conspiracy theory. The KGB and department of Injustice basically took a page from the 14th century Spanish Inquisition. In that first inquisition they would rape the wife and daughters of the victim until they confessed. Many men would stand up to the torture that Torquemada would levy, but the attacks on their family would break them.

So that's what our KGB and DOI did, they raped Flynn's family, Crooked fuck Weissman is on tape in the newly released exculpatory evidence telling Flynn that if he doesn't confess, they will throw HIS SON in prison and sell his grandchildren into slavery (place them in foster care). Meanwhile they cut a side deal with Kelner and Anthony to back off of C&B, whom the department of Injustice had already begun assaulting AND drop the bogus charges against Flynn Jr. if they would JUST GET FLYNN TO CONFESS.

Flynn had lost his home, every dime he had, and now the gangsters were attacking his family. He withstood more coercion than 90% of us would, but he finally confessed to the fabricated charges by the KGB.

WE KNOW ALL OF THIS, it's in the document dump.

Yet that corrupt pile of shit Sullivan obstructs justice.

Copy paste much?
I already explained why your analogy is flawed. Rape is a crime. Catching a person on lies isn't. Neither is threatening to charge someone's family since the only way that works is when that family is also culpable. Coercing someone to plead guilty is not a crime. In fact, it's by far the most common way a plea deal will ever be obtained. Under the law, the only concern is whether or not this coercion violates the rights of the accused or society.

Raping family falls under that heading. What happened to Flynn clearly doesn't. What I find interesting is that you are trying to make claims that even the motion to dismiss didn't cite.

I wrote every word.

Now we KNOW all of this is fact, Sidney Powell force the corrupt fuck Sullivan to release the exculpatory evidence that the DOI and he had hidden,

As far as your attempt to spin, extortion is a crime. When Strzok and Page extorted Covington & Burling they engaged in felonious acts. It's illegal to blackmail the defense team to coerce a confession.

Sullivan is obstructing justice, IF Barr has ANY BALLS, he will have Sullivan arrested.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

This judge has made some bizar rulings.

1) He said that there is no lacking Brady evidence in this case that has not been produced by the government to the defense. But the initial 302 which had the original transcript of what was said is missing, and no one seems to know where it is. It is the prosecutions responsibility to produce this document but only edited docs have been given for it instead. This is crucial in a case where the accused is charged with perjury relating to his testimony vrs what he actually said. There is no reliable proof that Flynn lied about anything without that 302.
2) Sullivans appointment of a known biased/prejudiced judge to play an advisory role is just bullshit, and the SCOTUS ruled against such things in criminal cases. The court is to decide on evidence brought to it, not go on a fishing expedition.
3) Sullivan himself early on in the case smeared Flynn as a traitor and a liar. He is not an objective judge at all.
4) Sullivan continues to deny the obvious reality that the DOJ extorted the confession from Flynn by threatening to prosecute/investigate Flynns son. This is hideous Beria type evil shit, and Democrats are defending it like we lived in their Chicom Paradise.

I have been wondering what can be done and Mark Levin brought up this idea of submitting a 'Writ of Prohibition' to the 5th Circuit Court, IIRC.

When you have a judge that ignores the law and thinks he is a legal author of law, I guess that is what you have to do. Boot this jack ass yesterday, DOJ.

Former DOJ spokesman Ian Prior suggests original FBI report on Flynn interview was 'intentionally lost'

Former Department of Justice Deputy Director of Public Affairs Ian Prior told Fox News Friday that the missing FBI report on a crucial interview of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is “a big issue.”

www.foxnews.com

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo last week on "Sunday Morning Futures" that the original 302 document — which typically summarizes witness interviews with agents — was “missing.”​

​

“It’s gone. Poof. It’s out of — we can’t find it," he said....​

​

Nunes claimed the original interview report was written and transcribed and recalled FBI sources telling him, “Look, there’s nothing to see here, Flynn wasn’t lying.”​

​

“So we knew this at the beginning of 2017, so you can imagine my astonishment when it began to leak out in the press that General Flynn was being busted for lying to the FBI,” he said. “And that, that’s what the Mueller team — the dirty Mueller team — that’s what they were going to bust him on.​

​

​

“And I told people at the highest levels of the FBI and the DOJ, I said, 'What are you doing here?' Like, we have, on the record, from the highest-level people that he didn't lie to the FBI,” he said.​

​

Prior said Friday that he can’t imagine the original 302 document was mislaid as a “mistake.”​

General Flynn did not get a fair trial.
They violated his 6th amendment rights.
He should sue.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If someone stands in a courtroom, gets sworn in, pleads guilty to something and then claims he didn't do what he claimed he did later. Does he not, in fact, commit perjury?

Not if he is coerced in ether or both cases, dipshit.

Interesting, how would both be coerced? His lawyer orders him to revise his guilty plea?

I'm still here.

You KNOW that Strzok engaged in extortion against Covington & Burling to force LtG. Flynn's lawyers, Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony to pressure him into making the false and coerced confession.

Did you think it was safe to come out lying again? Sorry, not the case.

Consider this, we either have the rule of law, or we don't. IF we don't, there is no reason in the world NOT to drag Emmett Sullivan out into the streets and beat him.

Are you Marxists SURE you want to destroy the rule of law? Absolutely sure?

Link this assertion please, you keep on making it without ever supporting it.

Don't be a fucking moron.

Exculpatory Russia evidence about Mike Flynn that US intel kept secret

What many ‘Russia collusion’ cheerleaders cite as the start of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow was, in fact, something very different.

thehill.com

New Court Documents Include Exculpatory Evidence For Michael Flynn

New documents filed under seal in federal court include exculpatory information about former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

thefederalist.com

Flynn's new legal team unleashes on his old lawyers in bid to withdraw guilty plea

The former Trump national security adviser pleaded guilty to a single false-statement charge in December 2017

www.politico.com

Flynn Prosecution Team Hid Exculpatory Evidence

By Brian Cates When two FBI agents arrived at the White House on the morning of January 24, 2017 to interview Lt. General...

uncoverdc.com

Michael Flynn lawyers claim client was 'set up' as FBI denies reports of exculpatory evidence cover-up

 

[forkup]

If someone stands in a courtroom, gets sworn in, pleads guilty to something and then claims he didn't do what he claimed he did later. Does he not, in fact, commit perjury?

Not if he is coerced in ether or both cases, dipshit.

Interesting, how would both be coerced? His lawyer orders him to revise his guilty plea?

I'm still here.

You KNOW that Strzok engaged in extortion against Covington & Burling to force LtG. Flynn's lawyers, Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony to pressure him into making the false and coerced confession.

Did you think it was safe to come out lying again? Sorry, not the case.

Consider this, we either have the rule of law, or we don't. IF we don't, there is no reason in the world NOT to drag Emmett Sullivan out into the streets and beat him.

Are you Marxists SURE you want to destroy the rule of law? Absolutely sure?

Link this assertion please, you keep on making it without ever supporting it.

Don't be a fucking moron.

Exculpatory Russia evidence about Mike Flynn that US intel kept secret

What many ‘Russia collusion’ cheerleaders cite as the start of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow was, in fact, something very different.

thehill.com

New Court Documents Include Exculpatory Evidence For Michael Flynn

New documents filed under seal in federal court include exculpatory information about former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

thefederalist.com

Flynn's new legal team unleashes on his old lawyers in bid to withdraw guilty plea

The former Trump national security adviser pleaded guilty to a single false-statement charge in December 2017

www.politico.com

Flynn Prosecution Team Hid Exculpatory Evidence

By Brian Cates When two FBI agents arrived at the White House on the morning of January 24, 2017 to interview Lt. General...

uncoverdc.com

Michael Flynn lawyers claim client was 'set up' as FBI denies reports of exculpatory evidence cover-up

First link provided.
There’s no sugarcoating the mistakes Flynn did make. By his own admission, he misled the FBI and Vice President Pence about the fact that sanctions did come up in a December 2016 conversation with Kislyak, then Moscow’s ambassador to the United States. He didn’t file proper foreign-lobbying paperwork for money he received from Turkish sources. And he likely did not file the proper paperwork disclosing or seeking permission for the $45,000 in speaking and travel fees he got for the RT event.
In this paragraph, the author describes 2 federal crimes. Lying to the FBI and failing to register as a foreign agent. All the rest is spin.

The second link speaks of exculpatory evidence for Flynn according to an anonymous source within the FBI, Yet the motion to dismiss filed by the prosecution does not mention this. Its argument is purely procedural in nature and no one is claiming that Flynn didn't lie, just that those lies don't constitute a criminal offense.

The third link.
Flynn’s current squad of attorneys contend that Flynn’s original legal counsel with the prominent Washington law firm Covington & Burling was too enmeshed in the early stages of Flynn’s legal troubles to give him detached advice about what to do once prosecutors from special counsel Robert Mueller’s office began threatening to prosecute the retired Army lieutenant general.
Third link. You see the defense claiming blackmail by the justice department here?

Fourth link. So you find someone who has a blog on the internet that claims Page and Strozk altered the original statement? Good for you. I can find people on the internet who claim the earth is flat. The blog doesn't provide any substantiation for the assertion that Page had anything to do with the original 302. And the descriptions of the e-mail between strozk and page are simply untrue.

As to me being a moron. I can only state that only one of us is trying to equate tactics that prosecutors employ daily when pursuing major cases is "rape"... twice no less. Even when the first time it is pointed out to him how stupid that analogy is. Only one of us provides links that don't support his own assertions. That person isn't me.

 

[Syriusly]

This judge has made some bizar rulings.

1) He said that there is no lacking Brady evidence in this case that has not been produced by the government to the defense. But the initial 302 which had the original transcript of what was said is missing, and no one seems to know where it is. It is the prosecutions responsibility to produce this document but only edited docs have been given for it instead. This is crucial in a case where the accused is charged with perjury relating to his testimony vrs what he actually said. There is no reliable proof that Flynn lied about anything without that 302.

I guess you don't consider General Flynn to be a reliable witness- since he confessed twice in court to lying to the FBI.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This judge has made some bizar rulings.

1) He said that there is no lacking Brady evidence in this case that has not been produced by the government to the defense. But the initial 302 which had the original transcript of what was said is missing, and no one seems to know where it is. It is the prosecutions responsibility to produce this document but only edited docs have been given for it instead. This is crucial in a case where the accused is charged with perjury relating to his testimony vrs what he actually said. There is no reliable proof that Flynn lied about anything without that 302.

I guess you don't consider General Flynn to be a reliable witness- since he confessed twice in court to lying to the FBI.

Coerced confessions are not admissible.

We know that the Inquisition not only extorted Flynn by credible threats against his family, but also extorted the law firm representing him to pressure him into the plea deal.

IF Sullivan knew that the KGB and the Injustice lawyers engaged in felonies to coerce the confession, then Sullivan is as guilty as Strzok and Page.

AG Barr should arrest Sullivan for obstruction of justice anyway.